Slashdot Mirror


China's 64bit Homegrown CPU

An anonymous reader writes: "EE Times is reporting on China's BLX IC Design Corp nearing the completion of their first 64-bit CPU. Based on the MIPS instruction set the 500-MHz Godson-2 microprocessor is aimed toward distributed grid computing. To avoid MIPS patent issues, several instructions (unaligned loads and storeds in the 32 bit version) have not been implemented but with the support of over 60 software providers such as Red Flag Linux and the ability to tweak compilers to not use these instructions this should not be a problem. The Godson-1 processor (also patent free) was announced last year and was aimed at the embedded market." The Godson processor line has generally been called Dragon by the Western press.

65 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Re:Mirror by Isbiten · · Score: 2, Informative

    Copy pasted for you, my friend at Slashdot :D

    BEIJING -- Stay tuned: China's first homegrown CPU is about to go 64-bit.

    One of the country's most promising start-ups, BLX IC Design Corp., Ltd., told EE Times Wednesday (March 5) that it is closing in on a 500-MHz microprocessor that it will market toward China's leading server vendors, including Legend Group and Dawning Technology. It would eventually be positioned as the engine of a distributed grid computing network that will be used by public and private firms here.

    The chip is dubbed Godson-2 and is the follow-on to a 32-bit, 266-MHz version released last year that is aimed at the embedded systems market. Both chips are largely based on the MIPS instruction set, but are not fully compatible because they avoid the use of key instructions that would run afoul of MIPS patents.

    BLX has moved quickly to rally Chinese industry support around the architecture, launching an alliance that intends to attract 100 members and create 100 designs within two years. "We already have 60 companies and 15 designs so we are ahead of schedule," said David Shen, chief executive of BLX. "We have started working with Haier, which is the biggest consumer manufacturer in China, and they need a lot of chips."

    All of the 60 companies that have joined are Chinese firms, Shen said, and they range from upstream hardware makers, to consumer giants like Haier, and software providers Red Flag Linux and Great Wall Software Co.

    Godson-2, which has also been translated into English as Dragon or Longxin, has already been prototyped. Samples are expected to roll in the first half of next year. The chip will be binary backward compatible to the 32-bit Godson-1, a path of compatibility first chosen by Advanced Micro Devices in development of its Opteron line.

    Some of the improvements over Godson-1 include a four-issue super-scaler architecture, dynamic branch prediction and a non-blocking cache design to allow for multiple misses in the memory array. The chip will probably be made on a 0.18-micron process at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., although Shanghai's Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. is also being considered.

    Planning for Godson-3

    Even though Godson-2 hasn't been officially rolled out, researchers at the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT), a government research group that first designed the Godson architecture before licensing it to BLX, are already thinking about a Godson-3. The core design will be similar. But more features should improve its standing.

    "By the end of next year, we hope we can add in multiprocessor support and on-chip secondary cache. If these features are added, the power consumption may be around 10 watts," said Tang Zhimin, a senior ICT engineer who headed up the Godson project. The power budget for Godson-2 is around 5 watts, based on a 1.8V core and 3.3V I/O.

    Also under consideration are SIMD for multimedia processing and multithreading support. "We are also looking at how to integrate multithreading with our current superscalar architecture," Tang said.

    --
    I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
  3. US or online vendors? by intermodal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldnt mind playing around with some of these. Also: how is availability here or in china for related hardware and motherboards?

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:US or online vendors? by ShadowDrake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My thoughts exactly. Sounds like it could be a viable C3 competitor-- cheap and cool-running, and Linux-friendly, with the added benefit of being able to slap "64-bit" on the label.

      I'll try any architecture once....

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    2. Re:US or online vendors? by intermodal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      plus its got the cache to be worthwhile. I find myself presently switching to a dual Pentium Pro because the my 900 MHz Duron has such a small cache that compiling is too bloody slow. These as it said in the article have 1MB of cache. Let's see someone else match that on an inexpensive chip.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  4. DRM? by supabeast! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully the Chinese will leave DRM out of their chips and give people looking for a "free" CPU a competitive option to the crippled intel/AMD CPUs.

    1. Re:DRM? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, I assume you're using the DRM buzzword to describe TCPA, which is something different entirely.

      But how would a chinese chip with no DRM be any different from an Intel chip with DRM disabled?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:DRM? by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hopefully the Chinese will leave DRM out of their chips and give people looking for a "free" CPU a competitive option to the crippled intel/AMD CPUs.

      How are Intel and/or AMD chips "crippled"? Are you referring to cpu id's? How would the "Dragon" be "free" and how could it be competitive running at 500mhz?

      Of course there is the ultimate irony of using DRM and China in the same sentence.

    3. Re:DRM? by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Of course, I assume you're using the DRM buzzword to describe TCPA, which is something different entirely."

      I meant DRM in general. Palladium, TCPA, or just processor ID numbers.

      "But how would a chinese chip with no DRM be any different from an Intel chip with DRM disabled?"

      It's the slippery-slope theory. intel chips might allow you to disable DRM at first, and then just make it mandatory at some point. Buying from a manufacturer that leaves it out entirely means that other companies always have to keep that competitor in mind.

    4. Re:DRM? by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "How are Intel and/or AMD chips "crippled"?"

      They will be when DRM becomes mandatory.

      "...how could it be competitive running at 500mhz?"

      Intel thought the same thing about AMD for a long time. Then the K6-2/450 was released, it sold like crazy, and AMD actually beat intel in sales for one quarter. After that intel startking kicking their R&D's ass to get better CPUs out quicker, because competion had kicked in. It might take a while, but the Chinese have plenty of resources, and they WILL get to a point where their CPUs are competitive with American CPUs.

    5. Re:DRM? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >> They will be when DRM becomes mandatory.

      I get tired of hearing that phrase. Do you really think the government is going to mandate TCPA technology? Yeah I know some crackpot sponsored a bill, but it was long since blown out of the water.

      That is, however, something that's very likely in China.

      As for Intel/AMD/VIA/Transmeta/IBM/Motorola, you think they'll all conspire together against you to make sure you use TCPA? They're competitors. If Intel made TCPA platforms that couldnt be disabled, AMD would pick up 100% of the market that doesnt want it.

      It just doesnt make any sense why people are so eager trust the Chinese govermnent as if they're some kind of savior for freedom of thought. I'd be very wary of what the Red Chinese would like to force into everyones desktop box.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:DRM? by zmooc · · Score: 4, Informative
      DRM functionality on a CPU does not cripple anything. It's the encryption of the media that may cripple the functionality you may have with regard to data from others. And it's the software/OS that has the option to use it.

      DRM only adds functionality like controlling what recipients are to allow to do with emails - just disable any functionality to forward emails which contain confidential data. Don't want others to use your picture for other purposes than viewing it on your website? Possible. Lost your Palm with those rather private pictures on it? No problem. And ofcourse digital media will no longer be copyable directly... but digital media will become a lot cheaper sometime in the future - the price is mainly due to the expensive technology used to create them; expensive studios, 3D-software, special-fx-software, videocamera's etc. are expensive but get cheaper and cheaper. This will not only drive the price of the media down (which will definately raise the volume) but bring a lot more on the market since it'll become a lot cheaper to make things for everyone. Especially with bandwith getting cheaper.

      Now the things that you DO have to fear:

      • DRM incompatibilities between different systems - you may need a lot of different plugins in that case... this may happen if e.g. Real first starts adding DRM to their realmedia, MS then comes up with their own passport-based shit and then finally some standards committee comes up with an open standard which is way too late
      • Closed standards - if Real of MS or whoever comes up with a closed standard which will only be available by using their software, us Linux users will be fucked. This may well happen since most average windows-using internetuser won't hesitate to install all this software and therefore market-penetraion won't be a problem as long as the software is free.
      • Patents on DRM-systems - Open Source would be locked out then. At least in the USA.
      • DRM becoming a requirement before about everybody has the hardware. And then still your old PC won't be able to open DRM-protected media since it a secure data-path has to be built into just about everything from the memory and the CPU all the way to the last peripherals.
      • DRM forcing no-fast-forward on you so you have to watch all the commercials.
      • Data-recovery not being though about - losing data due to a lost key or something would be bad. Something to solve this problem should be implemented. With regard to history in the future this will also be really important; without it the 21st century will be a very dark age in history!
      • The government or some large company having master-keys.
      • Expensive audits required to check for leaks driving the price of hardware (which will get a lot more complex anyway) up.
      • The first DRM-hardware like speakers and LCD-monitors not using wireless transmission by default:) For a really safe data-path, the DRM-decription hardware will have to be in your speakers and monitor so let's hope a wireless receiver will be built on the DRM-chip by default so we'll get cheap wireless peripherals and won't need all those cables anymore:) (everyhing will have to be powered, though. At least it'll safe CPU-cycles:)

      And then offcourse one can still record the analog output of the tv, monitor or speakers but for many applications it'd be really usefull, however.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    7. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Americans buying Chinese CPUs to protect their civil liberties? Now that would be rich...

      On the other hand, you never know what they might do.

    8. Re:DRM? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They will be when DRM becomes mandatory.

      IF. Not when, IF.

      Don't be such a fatalist.

    9. Re:DRM? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To think that they could go from copying a 500mhz chip to producing chips that can keep up with 3ghz x86 chips (and this is assuming that the x86 market stands still for a few years) seems to me a bit of a stretch.

      Funny, I recall almost precisely the same thing being said about Japanese dram production, round about the time of 16K (that's bits) drams.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Pff. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    64 bits? Maybe now someone will actually be able to calculate how much tea is meant when someone says "..all the tea in China".

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Pff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      thats japan you spastic

    2. Re:Pff. by Cumstien · · Score: 2, Funny

      To really prove its power, the chip would have to demonstrate that it has "all the tea in China" and "none of the tea in China" at the same time.

      That and someone would have to write a bunch of 64 bit software.

  7. China's Chip by hhawk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this shows 3 points

    1) Free and easily ported OS allows them to have a reasonable non-standard processors.

    2) US restrictions on exporting high powered chips and other computer parts are easily diluted by open standards.

    3) Test, over time, in the market place the use of cheap open chips vs. more expensive perhaps more cutting edge chips (from the west). Do you use 1 or 2 AMD or Intel chips costing 700 USD or 5 or 6 Dragon/Godson 2 chips costing? $5 or $50 (etc).

    Re #3, an engineer can tell you which is "best" but only the market can pick the real winner.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:China's Chip by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) Free and easily ported OS allows them to have a reasonable non-standard processors.

      Agreed. One of the reasons I love NetBSD.

      2) US restrictions on exporting high powered chips and other computer parts are easily diluted by open standards.

      Well I don't know if I'd call a watered down 500mhz MIPS based chip "high powered". Maybe once you lash 128 of them together you'll have a decently powered box, but individually, it's way less than yesterdays tech.

      3) Test, over time, in the market place the use of cheap open chips vs. more expensive perhaps more cutting edge chips (from the west). Do you use 1 or 2 AMD or Intel chips costing 700 USD or 5 or 6 Dragon/Godson 2 chips costing? $5 or $50 (etc).

      Not a good comparison I think. It costs $200 RETAIL for an Athlon 2400MP. Now home much supporting chips, power, etc would you need to put together 5 of those Dragons to get at the same fudged clock rate, assuming of course you're doing things that a parallizable enough to counter the loss in raw clock rate. There are other "non open" chips that are alternatives that cost less/run cooler/etc. I don't see how an "Open" chip helps at all here. Plus how is the Dragon "open"? They "steal" another companies tech and explicitly work around any licensing issues. That's "open"?

    2. Re:China's Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, MIPS asm _is_ an open standard and they were careful to not use the few instructions that were covered by patents.

    3. Re:China's Chip by Michael_Burton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I don't know if I'd call a watered down 500mhz MIPS based chip "high powered". Maybe once you lash 128 of them together you'll have a decently powered box, but individually, it's way less than yesterdays tech.

      I'm wondering how many computer users need the power of 128 64-bit CPUs to get their work done? On the desktop, my own observation has been that most of the raw CPU power growth during the past several years is being used for entertainment or GUI eye candy.

      Certainly, there is a class of computable problems that comes in reach only with lots and lots of CPU horsepower. But to dismiss this CPU, created at this early stage in China's development as a chip-maker, seems short-sighted. This CPU will be useful for lots of tasks. And we haven't heard the last of these guys.

      --
      When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
    4. Re:China's Chip by tetra103 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wholy crap! Here's a most informative post that dismisses half of all these garbage posts...and it gets modded down to a 0? Once again, you slashdot moderators are morons!!!! Point and case...China took an open standard and implemented it. I commend them for using an open standard. Would it have been better that they created their own bastardized microcode language? Instead of you fools ripping on China for *stealing* someones idea, maybe you should be ripping on Intel for continuing to make ugly ass processors. I can't say anything bad about AMD since they at least try bring order to the ugly world of Intel.

  8. Welcome to the future... by asparagus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're one a million, there's a thousand people just like you in China.

    Even though massive portions of the Chinese population are poor farmers, the contingent that has adopted the Internet is (as a result of being a smaller portion of a larger population) far beyond their US counterparts.

    The Internet allows for capitalism on global scale to be much easier. Up until now, the US has maintained the lead by appropriating the smartest people from other countries (H1-B's, etc.).

    However, we're about to see the trailing edge of this trend, where the smart kids stay at home. Already, one of the top 4 software development groups is based in India.

    To all you genius programmers: you're good. But are you good enough to outhack half a dozen Chinese guys working for half your salary?

    I predict that within 10 years, half the US programming market will have gone to these overseas firms.

    Anybody have any current data on this trend?

    -Brett

    1. Re:Welcome to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      To all you genius programmers: you're good. But are you good enough to outhack half a dozen Chinese guys working for half your salary?

      I predict that within 10 years, half the US programming market will have gone to these overseas firms.


      Been there, done that.


      Ed Yourdon's "Decline and Fall of the American Programmer"

      and the sequel

      Rise & Resurrection of the American Programmer

    2. Re:Welcome to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right here.

    3. Re:Welcome to the future... by vlad_petric · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The United States have been preaching "economical openness" for more than 2 decades now I think. "Do you want US aid? Open your economy ...". Quite a few times this worked against the country implementing the measure, but most of the times it worked well for the US (as its very competitive merchandise flooded those markets). There are some areas in which openness works against the US - like CS jobs.

      I believe that more and more jobs will be exported to India, but probably not China, because of the language barrier.

      Now I'm all for openness myself - I just believe that it *has* to be applied both ways.

      --

      The Raven

    4. Re:Welcome to the future... by Cyno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sure hope you're right. Er, well, no I don't. I wouldn't mind the US maintaining its economic superiority over the rest of the world, but honestly I just don't trust most Americans or Capitalists to do what is right whenever the choice involves money. So although the alternative may be chaos for a few years, perhaps even decades, I'm more willing to give it a try than accept the word of these old politicians and CEOs who can't even think creatively enough to make use of all the technology developed in the last two years. I can only imagine how draconian our laws will get when tomorrow's technology becomes available to the public.

      Wireless networks have almost all ISPs and media companies extremely confused. They just don't know what to do with it or how. Its not their fault, they're just old an obsolete. I say it is time for them to be replaced by new groups of communists and teams and people working together to learn and teach and solve problems without a heirarchy, without a class system.

      Maybe something good for a change, instead of business as usual. Because there's just no love in capitalism. AOL will NEVER, AT&T will NEVER, SBC will NEVER provide broadband up and down until it is forced to by its competition, Free Software, Open Source, Communism, good people that want to share, whatever you want to call it.

    5. Re:Welcome to the future... by cduffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being that the going rate for Chinese contract coders is between $10-20 and my take-home pay is $13/hr (plus a *lot* of stock), I think the chance of getting half a dozen of them to work for half my salary is pretty damn low -- and would be even at my old, pre-bust ($35/hr) pay rate.

      IIRC, Russian contractors are somewhat more expensive -- $20-30/hr -- and Indian contractors even more expensive than that, in the range of $30-40/hr, but with less of a reputation for leaking code.

      (My out-of-state short-term contract rates -- $70/hr -- may be forced to change, but since those mostly come in to play when someone calls me in to help maintain software I wrote previously, I doubt it).

  9. Nice power consumtion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the article it's only a 5W with an old 0.18um process.

    Godson-3 with SMP support and on-die cache will use only 10W while Intel Itanium2 uses 130W.

  10. DSP Chip announced yesterday by bstadil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't forget the DSP chip announced Yesterday. This is really bad news for TI, as the chinese market for cell phones is growing much faster than US and almost saturated Europe.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  11. Is China the next Japan? by MongooseCN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People used to hate products like electronics that came out of Japan. They used to be considered cheap crappy imitations. Now Japan is one of the most respected countries producing electronics, if not the best.

    So may China be next? China has a reputation for developing cheap goods and electronic equipment, but they seem to be getting better and better. Maybe someday soon they will be producing electronics as good, if not better, than any other country. The added benefit is that China doesn't follow all the same patent and copyright issues as other countries so they are truly free to innovate and compete. This coupled with Chinas new more positive view on Captitalism and China could become the new super power.

    1. Re:Is China the next Japan? by gardol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your post just shows that how much you know or don't know about China. There are more women in top government positions than in the US.

    2. Re:Is China the next Japan? by bfree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your point about a population crunch may or may not be valid and the reason I question it is that China is reputed to have created about 250 million people living outside of the official society, a black-population if you will (a la black market not whatever racist crap just popped into some trolls head). As long as they have that number of people outside of control a population crucnh is unlikely except for in the official figures. Personally I await the day these people arrive in Bejing together and ask the government if they would like to mow them all down with their tanks or reconsider where they are going with their nation. Also it is currently estimated that the population should peak in 2050 at 1.6 billion, and as for a population decline, who knows but China could well have a far longer run in the limelight than you forsee.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  12. Are they available for general use? by mcgroarty · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd love to find an offbeat processor like this on a board which still accepted standard PCI cards, or at least a few USB peripherals.

    Does anyone know if this, or another like it, will ever be available stateside with an ATX-mountable motherboard?

  13. yeah nice but performance ? by johnjones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how well it actually performs

    MHz is not everything I wonder how much of a performance penalty e.g. not having unaligned loads actually is and compared to a true MIPS core what the penalty

    anyone got basic benchmarks ?

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:yeah nice but performance ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MHz *IS* everything to a design thats a clone of MIPS.

  14. Wait a minute.. by ACK!! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They use linux right...

    How hard is it to create a new version of linux for a new CPU like this?

    I am no kernel hacker but doesn't there have to be certain hooks for the CPU included for a port to be successful?

    How do they get an OS (linux or whatever really) running on this thing?

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:Wait a minute.. by taniwha · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You can do a simple (non-optimised) kernel port to a fresh (but well behaved) CPU in 1-2 weeks if you know what you are doing and you already have a GCC port available - a production port is probably more like 6-months or more.

      Actually porting GLIBC is a lot more work than the kernel.

      Porting a kernel while debugging a new compiler for a new CPU architecture is a LOT more work than doing either (I know this from sad experience :-)

  15. Chinese article? by saihung · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone have a link to the announcement in Chinese, or to the Chinese company's site? I'm especially curious to see how they got the name "Godson", since there's no simple Chinese translation for the word "god". If the Chinese term is tian1zi3, which is suspect it is, then it really means "Son of Heaven", another term for the emperor.

    1. Re:Chinese article? by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this article. Since I can't really read simplified Chinese I am having a hard time reading through it. -_-|||

    2. Re:Chinese article? by cswiii · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a very communist name though.

      Well, the "communist system with chinese elements" may be closer to good old facism, but I doubt they'd use feudal terms to name products, esp. if they're going to have exposure abroad.

      Or have I missed a change in trademark trends?


      Chinese culture extends far beyond Communism. Communism did a good job in destroying a fair amount of Chinese culture, but it never came close to giving it the ole KO, nor has any other ruling class. The Mongols or the the communists, you name it... when you're contending with that many people, even if you're the ruling class, you just end up getting diluted in the population.

      This said, heaven ("tian") is used all over the place in China, as are plenty of other Taoist, Confucist and Buddhist terms.

      And China is pretty much "communist" in name only, anymore. It's still run with an iron fist by a small group of men, but if you've not been there, I encourage you to visit. You'll see capitalism one helluva lot more than you will redistribution of wealth.

  16. Re:The beginning by Visaris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think that is anything to worry about. I mean, think about it.

    Everyone in America is complaining about how US firms are employing foreign workings instead of US citizens. Once the foreign market starts to keep pace with / pass up the US, there will be an increased demand for IT workers in those countries. As demand for these workers increases, their salries will increase as well. This means US firms will be less eager to hire foreign workers.

    Also, I think the US could use a good kick in the pants when it comes to motivation for product innovation. This may be just what we need.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  17. Re:Nice architecture by Bender_ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Couldn't do any better than to choose the MIPS instruction set. I looked at it years ago and was impressed with its clean design

    Thats no wonder - it was refined during years of research by Henessey and Patterson.

    However if you look close you will notice that the instruction set does also contain some obselete legacy. For example branch delay slots do not make any sense with OOO Architectures. It is also questionable whether wasting quite a bit of instruction space for integer arithmetic both with and without overflow trapping is worth it. Maybe the could just have used the extra space for a proper move instruction so R0 is freed.

  18. MIPS pantent issue by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did post the story but the last sentence which was cut was very important.(Original).
    "Although there are no patent issues MIPS have been known to be very aggressive toward people who try to create compatible systems."

  19. This sounds famailar by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/05/202320 0&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=103 Hmmm......

  20. Reason for MIPS r0 by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe the could just have used the extra space for a proper move instruction so R0 is freed.

    The MIPS architecture already has a proper 'move' instruction without using r0: r12 = r8 | r8, or r12 = r8 | 0 (zero specified as immediate). The r0 is frozen at 0 so you can do negations (for which ARM uses 'rsb' or reverse subtraction) and other things where zero must be the first argument.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  21. Re:Wow... by Subotai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually that is just a nasty rumor to keep all the riff-raff out.

    --
    "The only way to catch tiger cubs is to go into the tiger's den."
  22. Re:The beginning by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Funny
    Note this in your dairy

    I'm putting it between the soy milk and the mango lassi.

  23. FINALLY... by cygnus · · Score: 3, Funny

    now we FINALLY know what the next PowerMac will run on. :)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  24. Re:Say what? by rugger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't ignore patent law when you want to eventually sell your products into Europe, America and the rest of the world.

  25. Longxin? English? by lwbecker2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...The chip is dubbed Godson-2 and is the follow-on to a 32-bit, 266-MHz version released last year that is aimed at the embedded systems market.
    ...snip...
    Godson-2, which has also been translated into English as Dragon or Longxin, has already been prototyped. "


    uh... since when is "Longxin" English? no entry in the Dictionary

    1. Re:Longxin? English? by questionlp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably should have been written as "or Romanized as Longxin" (ie: translating the characters sort of by pronouncation/description into something that can be written using Roman/Latin characters).

      Dragon is probably the closest meaning/definition translation of the word.

      I could be wrong though. :|

  26. With SPARC they wouldn't have any patent issue... by maitas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, SPARC would have been a far better option, since it's a 100% open spec paltform. The license cost just $99!!! Amazing..

  27. MICRO computing, Multithreading, Multiprocessing by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    umm.... 5 dollars a cpu = HUGE multistacks of little mobos... I said this the first time the dragon was on slashdot.

    Please say "Blah Blah, It isn't cost efficient." If you can run a 500mhz Dragon for 5 watts, and an Itanium for 130, why not run 26x500mhz Dragons? or kick it up a notch for 32x500mhz.

    Also, if you need something real to look at and you can't understand why this is a good idea, have a look at a PC104 board.

    Now Since I've discussed this in the desktop/server cluster end of the spectrum, imagine how this will help portable/wearable/embedded device technology, if their Desktop CPU is planned to run at 5 watts, imagine their portable CPU.

  28. Sounds like a winner.. by digital+photo · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the sound of it, the Godson chips will be lower powered in terms of performance to current US chips. However, I find the energy consumption to be very attractive. Ie, 5 watts and 10 watts for 266Mhz 500 Mhz respectively. Scaling up linearly, that's still just 20 watts of power consumption for a 2Ghz chip.

    But what I'm thinking is that China is aiming for is low cost and low power consumption chips. Ie, can be used in portable hardware and/or massively parallel setups.

    Granted, they can't SMP the chips in hardware, but with a Linux cluster of these, they could quite readily setup a powerful computing cluster.

    Personally, I'm glad that they are designing their own chips. It would be nice to see more competition outside of just the big two.

    The way I see it, if they produce these chips at low prices($15-$50), at such low power consumption levels, I could easily see myself building many small nodes of them. Maybe now, I can POVray just ever so faster... :)

  29. Yeah, but can you build a... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... Beowurf cruster out of them?

    Oh, my goodness. I'm so sorry!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Yeah, but can you build a... by AlienWorker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cruster... That's a typical Engrish word, not Chinglish though.

  30. Marketing Literature by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Funny

    GODSON-2, now 50%* faster at performing miracles than our original GODSON-1 (Jesus) line without the overheating issues associated with the FIRSTANGEL (Lucifer) series.

    Note: 50% speed improvement is valid. PhilosopherMark2003 does not take in to account issues that need to be addressed in the new millenium and therefore produces unbalanced results in favor of BhuddaTechnologies's processor line.

  31. 500mhz MIPS based chip "high powered": actually... by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI 500Mhz/64bit/1mb cache is fairly close to the top end of what you can buy from everyone's favorite MIPS-based vendor, SGI. I think the top end from SGI is an R14000(A?) at 700Mhz with (1?2?)Mb of cache. [Yeah, you can tell I keep real on top of the cpus in machines that cost more than my annual salary in most cases. ;)] c.f. the Fuel line of workstations.

  32. Dragon? by Zazi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who gets a laugh out of what the west calls this processor? It's made in Communist China... Communism = bad... USSR... Red Dragon... ahhh forget it.

  33. Re:Say what? by cswiii · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. First, you obviously know nothing about the Chinese marketplace.
    2. They are cracking down on it. When I was in Beijing, I passed a billboard several times that had posted, in BIG letters, something like "BETTER FOLLOW NEW COPYRIGHT PROPERTY LAWS". Wish I'd had a camera at the time(s).

    While pretty funny, in an outsider-looking-in sorta way, it's just more evidence of what they're doing to try and limit piracy and IP theft.

  34. Leapfrog in technology? by nemeosis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This chip might be an interesting move. We have seen leap frogs in technology adoption in developing countries.

    Examples:
    1. US homes are still mostly connected via copper phone lines. Developing countries which are barely starting to lay out their communications network infrastructure are laying out fiber optic lines. Whether this is good or not is still yet to be seen. Fabric switches are still incredibly expensive.

    2. Cell phone technologies in Japan, Korea, and other asian countries are connected via newer and more advanced 3G CDMA digital technology. For some countries, its much cheaper to build a wireless infrastructure than it is to lay out ground cables. China is pushing their own CDMA technology.

    So, with this new 64-bit CPU, maybe China will make the leapfrog into 64-bit computing. They will have a Linux system capabable of handling a 64-bit instruction set. Assuming of course, that Microsoft doesn't shutter some kind of shady deal with the Chinese government, to have them all running their servers on Windows 2000/.Net operating systems. The company making the chip will have to speed up the CPU though, but maybe they can follow Moore's Law and double every 18 months.

    Who knows, maybe this will cause a revolution in China. The population will be running their systems on a more advanced 64-bit Linux system running MIPS-like instruction set. Then again.. maybe not? The market will decide.

  35. To tell you what the real meaning of the "Godson" by solo4bird · · Score: 2, Informative

    Based on the traditional chinese culture, it is considered to be easier to bring up a little baby, when it is tittle, that parents give there child a "Ugly" nickname. So ,in Chinese, 'Gou Sheng'(means a kid is brought up by puppy's leftover) is normally used, especially in countryside, which pronunciation in chinese(just like the pronunciation of Goshen ) is just like Godson, which meaning is so good in English.

    In China, it is normally called as Long Xin, which didn't mean Dragon Hear. As some of you guys know, Long in Chinese means Dragon and Xin means heart. But there is another meanings of Long and Xin, Long reffers to All Chinese People and Xin means chip. So longxin means Chinese Chip!

    If you guys want to know the story of developing the chip and if you understand Chinese , you can navigate to the following URLs£

    http://www.pconline.com.cn/news/hotpick/hy/10210 /9 7594.html

    http://www.csdn.net/Develop/article/15%5C15461.s ht m