Slashdot Mirror


China's 64bit Homegrown CPU

An anonymous reader writes: "EE Times is reporting on China's BLX IC Design Corp nearing the completion of their first 64-bit CPU. Based on the MIPS instruction set the 500-MHz Godson-2 microprocessor is aimed toward distributed grid computing. To avoid MIPS patent issues, several instructions (unaligned loads and storeds in the 32 bit version) have not been implemented but with the support of over 60 software providers such as Red Flag Linux and the ability to tweak compilers to not use these instructions this should not be a problem. The Godson-1 processor (also patent free) was announced last year and was aimed at the embedded market." The Godson processor line has generally been called Dragon by the Western press.

19 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. US or online vendors? by intermodal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldnt mind playing around with some of these. Also: how is availability here or in china for related hardware and motherboards?

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  3. China's Chip by hhawk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this shows 3 points

    1) Free and easily ported OS allows them to have a reasonable non-standard processors.

    2) US restrictions on exporting high powered chips and other computer parts are easily diluted by open standards.

    3) Test, over time, in the market place the use of cheap open chips vs. more expensive perhaps more cutting edge chips (from the west). Do you use 1 or 2 AMD or Intel chips costing 700 USD or 5 or 6 Dragon/Godson 2 chips costing? $5 or $50 (etc).

    Re #3, an engineer can tell you which is "best" but only the market can pick the real winner.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:China's Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, MIPS asm _is_ an open standard and they were careful to not use the few instructions that were covered by patents.

  4. Welcome to the future... by asparagus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're one a million, there's a thousand people just like you in China.

    Even though massive portions of the Chinese population are poor farmers, the contingent that has adopted the Internet is (as a result of being a smaller portion of a larger population) far beyond their US counterparts.

    The Internet allows for capitalism on global scale to be much easier. Up until now, the US has maintained the lead by appropriating the smartest people from other countries (H1-B's, etc.).

    However, we're about to see the trailing edge of this trend, where the smart kids stay at home. Already, one of the top 4 software development groups is based in India.

    To all you genius programmers: you're good. But are you good enough to outhack half a dozen Chinese guys working for half your salary?

    I predict that within 10 years, half the US programming market will have gone to these overseas firms.

    Anybody have any current data on this trend?

    -Brett

    1. Re:Welcome to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      To all you genius programmers: you're good. But are you good enough to outhack half a dozen Chinese guys working for half your salary?

      I predict that within 10 years, half the US programming market will have gone to these overseas firms.


      Been there, done that.


      Ed Yourdon's "Decline and Fall of the American Programmer"

      and the sequel

      Rise & Resurrection of the American Programmer

  5. Nice power consumtion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the article it's only a 5W with an old 0.18um process.

    Godson-3 with SMP support and on-die cache will use only 10W while Intel Itanium2 uses 130W.

  6. DSP Chip announced yesterday by bstadil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't forget the DSP chip announced Yesterday. This is really bad news for TI, as the chinese market for cell phones is growing much faster than US and almost saturated Europe.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  7. Is China the next Japan? by MongooseCN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People used to hate products like electronics that came out of Japan. They used to be considered cheap crappy imitations. Now Japan is one of the most respected countries producing electronics, if not the best.

    So may China be next? China has a reputation for developing cheap goods and electronic equipment, but they seem to be getting better and better. Maybe someday soon they will be producing electronics as good, if not better, than any other country. The added benefit is that China doesn't follow all the same patent and copyright issues as other countries so they are truly free to innovate and compete. This coupled with Chinas new more positive view on Captitalism and China could become the new super power.

  8. Chinese article? by saihung · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone have a link to the announcement in Chinese, or to the Chinese company's site? I'm especially curious to see how they got the name "Godson", since there's no simple Chinese translation for the word "god". If the Chinese term is tian1zi3, which is suspect it is, then it really means "Son of Heaven", another term for the emperor.

  9. Re:The beginning by Visaris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think that is anything to worry about. I mean, think about it.

    Everyone in America is complaining about how US firms are employing foreign workings instead of US citizens. Once the foreign market starts to keep pace with / pass up the US, there will be an increased demand for IT workers in those countries. As demand for these workers increases, their salries will increase as well. This means US firms will be less eager to hire foreign workers.

    Also, I think the US could use a good kick in the pants when it comes to motivation for product innovation. This may be just what we need.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  10. Re:DRM? by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "How are Intel and/or AMD chips "crippled"?"

    They will be when DRM becomes mandatory.

    "...how could it be competitive running at 500mhz?"

    Intel thought the same thing about AMD for a long time. Then the K6-2/450 was released, it sold like crazy, and AMD actually beat intel in sales for one quarter. After that intel startking kicking their R&D's ass to get better CPUs out quicker, because competion had kicked in. It might take a while, but the Chinese have plenty of resources, and they WILL get to a point where their CPUs are competitive with American CPUs.

  11. MIPS pantent issue by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did post the story but the last sentence which was cut was very important.(Original).
    "Although there are no patent issues MIPS have been known to be very aggressive toward people who try to create compatible systems."

  12. Reason for MIPS r0 by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe the could just have used the extra space for a proper move instruction so R0 is freed.

    The MIPS architecture already has a proper 'move' instruction without using r0: r12 = r8 | r8, or r12 = r8 | 0 (zero specified as immediate). The r0 is frozen at 0 so you can do negations (for which ARM uses 'rsb' or reverse subtraction) and other things where zero must be the first argument.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  13. Re:Say what? by rugger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't ignore patent law when you want to eventually sell your products into Europe, America and the rest of the world.

  14. Re:Wait a minute.. by taniwha · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You can do a simple (non-optimised) kernel port to a fresh (but well behaved) CPU in 1-2 weeks if you know what you are doing and you already have a GCC port available - a production port is probably more like 6-months or more.

    Actually porting GLIBC is a lot more work than the kernel.

    Porting a kernel while debugging a new compiler for a new CPU architecture is a LOT more work than doing either (I know this from sad experience :-)

  15. Re:DRM? by zmooc · · Score: 4, Informative
    DRM functionality on a CPU does not cripple anything. It's the encryption of the media that may cripple the functionality you may have with regard to data from others. And it's the software/OS that has the option to use it.

    DRM only adds functionality like controlling what recipients are to allow to do with emails - just disable any functionality to forward emails which contain confidential data. Don't want others to use your picture for other purposes than viewing it on your website? Possible. Lost your Palm with those rather private pictures on it? No problem. And ofcourse digital media will no longer be copyable directly... but digital media will become a lot cheaper sometime in the future - the price is mainly due to the expensive technology used to create them; expensive studios, 3D-software, special-fx-software, videocamera's etc. are expensive but get cheaper and cheaper. This will not only drive the price of the media down (which will definately raise the volume) but bring a lot more on the market since it'll become a lot cheaper to make things for everyone. Especially with bandwith getting cheaper.

    Now the things that you DO have to fear:

    • DRM incompatibilities between different systems - you may need a lot of different plugins in that case... this may happen if e.g. Real first starts adding DRM to their realmedia, MS then comes up with their own passport-based shit and then finally some standards committee comes up with an open standard which is way too late
    • Closed standards - if Real of MS or whoever comes up with a closed standard which will only be available by using their software, us Linux users will be fucked. This may well happen since most average windows-using internetuser won't hesitate to install all this software and therefore market-penetraion won't be a problem as long as the software is free.
    • Patents on DRM-systems - Open Source would be locked out then. At least in the USA.
    • DRM becoming a requirement before about everybody has the hardware. And then still your old PC won't be able to open DRM-protected media since it a secure data-path has to be built into just about everything from the memory and the CPU all the way to the last peripherals.
    • DRM forcing no-fast-forward on you so you have to watch all the commercials.
    • Data-recovery not being though about - losing data due to a lost key or something would be bad. Something to solve this problem should be implemented. With regard to history in the future this will also be really important; without it the 21st century will be a very dark age in history!
    • The government or some large company having master-keys.
    • Expensive audits required to check for leaks driving the price of hardware (which will get a lot more complex anyway) up.
    • The first DRM-hardware like speakers and LCD-monitors not using wireless transmission by default:) For a really safe data-path, the DRM-decription hardware will have to be in your speakers and monitor so let's hope a wireless receiver will be built on the DRM-chip by default so we'll get cheap wireless peripherals and won't need all those cables anymore:) (everyhing will have to be powered, though. At least it'll safe CPU-cycles:)

    And then offcourse one can still record the analog output of the tv, monitor or speakers but for many applications it'd be really usefull, however.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  16. Sounds like a winner.. by digital+photo · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the sound of it, the Godson chips will be lower powered in terms of performance to current US chips. However, I find the energy consumption to be very attractive. Ie, 5 watts and 10 watts for 266Mhz 500 Mhz respectively. Scaling up linearly, that's still just 20 watts of power consumption for a 2Ghz chip.

    But what I'm thinking is that China is aiming for is low cost and low power consumption chips. Ie, can be used in portable hardware and/or massively parallel setups.

    Granted, they can't SMP the chips in hardware, but with a Linux cluster of these, they could quite readily setup a powerful computing cluster.

    Personally, I'm glad that they are designing their own chips. It would be nice to see more competition outside of just the big two.

    The way I see it, if they produce these chips at low prices($15-$50), at such low power consumption levels, I could easily see myself building many small nodes of them. Maybe now, I can POVray just ever so faster... :)

  17. Yeah, but can you build a... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... Beowurf cruster out of them?

    Oh, my goodness. I'm so sorry!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.