Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Subscribers Now See The Future

We're pleased to announce the newest reason for you to subscribe to Slashdot. Besides the ability to suppress banner ads, limit journal postings to friends, and a few plums, Subscribers now see stories posted on Slashdot from The Mysterious Future! These stories are recognizable by the red title bar, and the lack of a time stamp. Subscribers will be able to beat the rush and read the links before everyone else. You can hit the link below and I'll explain exactly what this means. If this appeals to you, you could read the subscriber FAQ or just go subscribe. First off, this feature doesn't change anything for non-subscribers. All Slashdot stories are put into the story queue before you see them. The time stamps on these stories vary tremendously. Sometimes the story is posted days in advance (like, say, a Book Review or an Ask Slashdot where time isn't critical and we post a set number a week) Other stories are "Breaking News" and are posted just seconds before they go live. But most stories are posted 20-30 minutes before they go live. This time window gives other authors a chance to take a look at them. To fix spelling, to check for dupes (HAH!) or even to reject the story outright!

So while subscribers won't see news posted at the last minute before everyone else, most of our stories will be available to them 10-20 minutes before everyone else. This means they can click through and beat the Slashdot Effect.

Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window. We haven't decided if that's a good idea or not. Since subscribers are still subject to all the same restrictions as anyone else in the forums, they could still be moderated into oblivion if they were jerks about it so it's probably not subject to all that much abuse, but this is still something we're only considering. Feel free to discuss it in this forum, or to contact me with opinions.

A couple of notes here:

  • Subscribers have a variable on their subscriptions preference page that tells us how many banner ads they wish to "Spend" per day. This number must be at least 10 for you to be eligible to see the Mysterious Future plum. This means that your $5 subscription will last 100 days- or, $15-20 a year.
  • You also need to hit the checkbox to disable ads on the Index. Once you hit your Max Pages for the day, you will see ads again, but you will also be eligible for the plum.
  • These notes will be clarified on both the subscriptions page and in the FAQ very soon. Your feedback will help us decide how best to explain this since it's not exactly black & white here. Give us a couple weeks and it should all be blazingly obvious from the documentation how everything works.

In closing, this is a new feature and we appreciate all your feedback, both good and bad. We decided to implement this after tons of feedback from you, and we're really excited about it. This is a really great incentive for users to subscribe, but it also can give subscribers a chance to alert us in advance if stories have mistakes in them. We'll likely be expanding this sort of functionality in the future.

Now please go subscribe and help support Slashdot!

Update To clarify the timing. Right now the mysterious future is set to 20 minutes. That number is not a promise tho, since a story posted 11 minutes before "Air time" would be seen slighter later. A story posted 30 minutes in advance will be visible 20 minutes early.

35 of 945 comments (clear)

  1. /. effect? by Lothar+0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will this now result in a pre-/. effect? Maybe the subscribers will be nice enough to mirror /.-ed sites on their own sites before the rush, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
  2. Re:Hah! First! by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you see the article hours before most of slashdot readers, I think that yes, this will be a subscriber benefit. For the others a lot of discussions will start half full just when the article is widely available.

  3. Hmmmm by ZaMoose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't TotalFark already go this route? What's next, Slashdot Photoshop contests? *grin*

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    1. Re:Hmmmm by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Farks a touch differant in that a lot of the total fark news items never make it to the front page at all. So you are paying more to see the list of ALL of the submitted stories and not just what's being published before it goes live. Also with Total Fark you could get a head start on the photoshop contests.

  4. Awesome by RedWolves2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But..
    Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window. We haven't decided if that's a good idea or not. Since subscribers are still subject to all the same restrictions as anyone else in the forums, they could still be moderated into oblivion if they were jerks about it so it's probably not subject to all that much abuse, but this is still something we're only considering. Feel free to discuss it in this forum, or to contact me with opinions.

    I don't think that is a good idea. I think the fact that users can read ahead of time and then they can prepare their posts. This might make better prepared comments.

  5. Re:Hah! First! by idiotnot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it would be, and AC's (unless they're logged in, posting anonymously) would be 30 minutes and 100 comments behind.....

    I could start reading at zero again.

    FWIW, I did subscribe. It wasn't much. I just wanted to get the ads out of the story pages. Banner ads don't bother me. I went back and checked before I posted, and I've still got like 400 out of the 1000 pages left. It's been worth it, I think, and this will just convince me to renew when the time comes.

  6. Allowing posting would be bad! by DavidpFitz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window.
    But this would mean 2 things:

    (1) If a story gets pulled, lots of comments could already be posted. This would be pretty annoying if you had spent some time posting.
    (2) Moderation is biased torwards early posters, and as such it would provide a disincentive for non-subscribers to post, thereby reducing the amount of discussion. This could be a good thing, since subscribers (hopefully!) provide more worthwhile reading.

    1. Re:Allowing posting would be bad! by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Insightful
      (1) This is a big issue and one that we would need to consider. I guess what it would probably mean is that you post to future-dated stories at your own risk. You're seeing Slashdot behind the scenes, you should expect some dust.

      (2)Moderation is already based towards early posters. But since subscribers will likely only represent a small percentage of all posting, I can't imagine more than a few dozen comments making it inside this window. And right now, the first couple dozen posts are almost always disposable anyway.

      We already know pretty reliable that subscribers are statistically better moderators. (we've done a bunch of internal reports, and basically according to M2 results, they are several percent more "Fair" then the population as a whole. I don't think we've ever done any reporting to see if subscribers are better posters. I'm guessing they would be less likely to crapflood, but beyond that, I really would only be speculating.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    2. Re:Allowing posting would be bad! by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Insightful
      We've considered such a ranking system, but we're scared that we'd create another video game out of Slashdot. We learned a lot from Karma. Users started abusing it. It's purpose was misunderstood and turned into a game. It was never really intended to be that- it was intended to be a useful indicator for moderation eligibility and a few extra features on the site.

      So any ranking system we designed would have to be very carefully thought through. Frankly I don't really care to see "The top 100 Slashdot Users" on a web page... but I would like to see "The Top 100 Recent Good Journals" or something. Personally I'm not interested in "Is Joe Good or Bad" I'm interested in "Is this journal a good journal and worth my time to read". Hence the threshold based moderation system. Someday perhaps we'll apply that to journals somehow.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
  7. No Anonymous early posts by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a bit ambivilent about the early posting idea, since having an early post is directly related to the number of people likely to see your post, that "privilege" suddenly becomes a paid one. So people who might actually have something worthwhile to contribute suddenly have to become paying members.

    But anyway, that is not the point of this post. I just wanted to say that if they do allow early posters, that they should NOT allow these early posts to be anonymous. This should help keep the quality of the early posts up. Maybe even have another modifier that increases any negative moderation by 1, again to try make the privilage of early posting a true privilage and keep abuse down.

    1. Re:No Anonymous early posts by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How lame is that. If you had something interesting to say, it would be modded up no matter when you posted.

      Not true. If you're post is the 748th on an article, the odds of any appreciable number of moderators seeing it are very slim. Esp. since by then, you'd be buried in amongst a lot of other non-moderated posts. You can see this effect all the time. This is esp. true for things like redundancy.

  8. Re:well golly by leviramsey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Thats a pretty good idea. I would still think the /. effect would be better suppressed if slashdot would mirror stories, especially if its running off of somebody's mother's DSL connection.

    Maybe make the Slashdot mirror only for subscribers?

  9. One problem I see with this... by Champaign · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is the fact that if subscribers post first, their postings will always be read first. If their postings are read first (or potentially the only comments read as I often get bored when reading tons of comments and stop half-way through), they will be moderated first. Assuming positive moderation, they will get the mod points and higher karma.

    In a round-about way this is a bit like selling karma (something I think you've avoided).

    Good show! Could I purchase 1.25 kg of enlightment please?

  10. Beating the slashdot effect? by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Gee, I'm sure all the web sites that are suddenly and violently knocked off the web will be happy to know that slashdot is doing this for their subscribers. This seems a little like saying, well, my movie theater is quite flammable, so if you pay me $5 more, I'll make sure to seat you by an exit so you can get out before everyone else dies. It doesn't change the core problem, i.e., that slashdot is posting stories where they know from the outset that the effect is going to be a massive web server smackdown, and providing neither a mirror or a warning to anyone that this is about to happen.

    Perhaps now there will be a little bit of warning. When you start seeing the first referrals from slashdot on your web server, those are the subscribers -- the advance guard before the real assault.

  11. a microcosm lesson for everyone by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you pay more, you get more

    unfortunate, but true

    for healthcare, for the legal system, for media/ information

    equality is an illusion

    true in life, true in not-real-life internet communities

    sad but true

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  12. Re:But... by gallen1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Information may want to be free but bandwidth is another story.

  13. Pre-posting is a bad idea by techmuse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window."

    This is a bad idea, because earlier posts tend to be moderated higher than later posts, simply because more people see earlier posts. This will give subscribers a much louder voice in the forums, while potentially degrading the quality of the discussion.

  14. Reasons for not subscribing. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I like Slashdot a lot. I come here every day. Despite the common flames (and downright freaky displays of human frailty around -1), I think the group consensus here is fantastic. It's often very funny, and I like knowing what all the really smart mf'ers think about certain issues and topics. I feel smarter for reading Slashdot.

    Having said that, my lack of subscription is for a very simple reason: it's not professional.

    I won't subscribe until I never see a dupe or typo. Really, for all of our vaunted technology, if Slashdot cannot surmount these two very simple obstacles, it doesn't deserve any real monetary support. It just doesn't. And again, I say this as a real fan.

    Fix that, Taco, and you've got my money. And maybe even a little more credibility.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Reasons for not subscribing. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Allow me to rebutt this.

      I don't care about dupes and I don't care about typos. I've seen much worse than this on so-called professional news sites...in fact, I'd have to say that when compared to our local fox affilitate, Slashdot looks like the goddamn BBC.

      I don't visit slashdot for the regurgitated, puree'd content. I visit slashdot for the clout. I visit for the semi-high profile interviews and the "insider" info.

      And most importantly, I visit for the posts. If slashdot were just Drudge for technolosers, I wouldn't come back. But we have millions of intelligent people with degrees and experience chomping at the bit to respond to everything that gets posted. At the same time, we have a bunch of assholes waiting to post the funniest eye-opening responses they can. And we've trolls willing to play devil's advocate and to hell with karma, they're going to counterargue just to get us talking.

      Slashdot is like a giant block party for subversive loner technology geniuses. It's hip, it's grooving, and if they want $15, they'll get it from me.

      This BS about dupe checking, typos? Come on. It's not that important, and it adds to the "news of the second" quality that makes /. so appealing.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Reasons for not subscribing. by pjrc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Informal news source ... is core to its appeal.

      Yes, that's a big part of the appeal. But, spell_check != formal_news. You need to do so much more to be a formal news site. You're so far away from being a formal news site that the tiny incremenatal change of spell checking really is a tiny drop in the ocean of change needed to become "formal". But it would make reading slashdot less irritating (and there's spell checking software that make this easy, unlike avoiding dups...)

      I just feel like people who make these arguments want to fundamentally change the very nature of what Slashdot is!

      You're saying that integrating a spell checking into the story posting process would fundamentally change the very nature of slashdot.

      Now if you were to investigate all stories, use a formal writing style, write your own copy instead of primarily using the submission text, and dozens of other things... then you'd be talking about changing the nature of slashdot. Integrating a spell checking into the story posting, and even into comment posting and posting to the story submission just isn't going to change the fundamental nature of slashdot.

  15. suggestion by sigxcpu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe Slashdot will locally cache the sites they are about to slashdot.
    I think people would be willing to subscribe to such a service.

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  16. sounds like the coke machine fiasco by cheesyfru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good marketing, Slashdot! It reminds me of the Coke machine fiasco a few years ago. They tested machines that had temperature controls -- when the temperature got hot, it would automatically raise the price of the bottles. The media caught wind of this and had a field day. If Coca Cola had only beaten them to the punch and billed it as a "machine that discounts soda in cold weather", they'd have been heros.

    "Slashdot subscribers - you get news quicker!" Sounds a lot better than "Cheapskates: you get delayed news!", doesn't it?

  17. Re:But I don't see any ads now ... by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Suppressing ads from servers is a fairly common practice. Probably 2-3% of our users do it. And that number will likely grow as browsers make it very easy to do so. Thats why we're adding plums unrelated to advertising on Slashdot. We knew that the Ad Suppression filter was really more of an Honor System kind of thing since using Junkbuster or even Mozilla's built in blocking is trivial for even the most competant of users.

    However we hope that enough of our users will think beyond that and try to support us. Programmers, Editors, OC3s and Racks of web servers cost money.

    --
    Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
  18. Re:Hah! First! by JPriest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ISP's figured out a long time ago that people would rather pay for one month of unlimited access than a bucket load of hours that would probably take them over a month to use. People, like information want to be (feel) free.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  19. Immediate "Contact the Author" form? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to fix spelling, to check for dupes (HAH!) or even to reject the story outright!

    How about putting a simple little form underneath the stories for these previews? Something like:

    Story is:
    [] dupe (enter orig. url: ______)
    [] fake (rebuttal url: ______)
    [] mis-filed (better section: {popup})
    [] mirrored (enter mirror url: _____)
    Misc. Comments: [__________________]
    [submit comment to editor / author]

    Something like this would make it trivial for people to immediately help with the editorial process -- as opposed to having to write up a full email, etc. Plus, by allowing previewers to voluntarily announce a mirror this way, a list of mirrors could be presented once the mirror goes live, right at the top of the article. (come to think of it, it might be good to keep a mirror link list / submission form for all users, even once it's posted...)

  20. Re:well golly by MojoRilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd even go so far as to maybe allow a subscriber another +1 bonus to karma, or maybe allow a subscriber a higher karma cap, or even let a subscribers post get modded to +6... but what do I know...

    Features like letting people see stories early or giving them extra karma for money will cheapen and ultimately ruin the site.

    Having money doesn't mean you are more intelligent, or have more important things to say. By giving people time to prepare their posts, or giving them higher karma for paying, we are saying that what they say is more important than other people.

    Following these trends, ultimately the quality of slashdot posts will decrease, which is the whole reason for the moderation / karma system in the first place.

  21. You know what would make me subscribe? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll be more likely to subscribe when I see:

    • Professional Journalism
    • Proper use of English
    • Less flippant editorializing by the staff
    • More in-depth, investigative reporting

    Being able to see articles "early" just doesn't motivate me to send money.

  22. I just don't understand Slashdot ... by pgrote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am a Total Fark susbcriber and the only reason I did it was to get access to EVERYTHING that was submitted.

    The enjoyment in using Fark comes from the ability to see what other people think is unique and newsworthy.

    Slashdot is a great clearinghouse not only for technical news, but of technical thought as well. How many times have articles been submitted that the editors don't think are relevent to their vision, but that I'll get value from?

    Isn't that what Slashdot should be selling? Access to the stuff other people consider important?

    When I read Taco's explanation about the early preview the only thing it does is:

    1) Offer the community the ability to check dupes.
    2) Offer a headstart on crushing a site.

    If a site is going to get slashdotted what is the big deal if it's slashdotted by the first 100 or the last 100? It's still going to be slashdotted.

    If anyone from the Slashdot editor team is listening ... why not open up the whole queue for people to read? No comments, but at least let us check out what other people think is important and relevent.

    Right now your model is focused on avoiding ads. Why? Focus on the CONTENT and you'll do much much better.

  23. Re:/. effect? (Market opportunity) by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think it would REALLY be coercion... After-all, the webmaster COULD just remove the page... I don't think anyone will be going over their bandwidth cap if they are just serving up a "Click HERE to help pay for my bandwidth" page.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  24. Re:Circumvention? by peterpi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm sure such a post would get modded fairly (i.e. -1 Offtopic). I guess most subscribers are keen posters too, so they care about their karma.

    Perhaps it would be a good idea to disallow A/C posting during the subscriber-only period?

  25. Re:Hah! First! [privoxy, transproxy, and regex] by Bill+Privatus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, it's the spirit of the thing, y'know?

    Go ahead and block slashdot ads if you want. I'd like to think slashdot isn't evil, like x10.com.

    If you don't want to subscribe, don't. But I don't think it's virtuous to not subscribe, to kill ads, *and* to post saying "I'm bright - and you can be, too!".

    Do the first two, and you're fine. The last makes you an anti-slashdot fanatic and you'll no doubt be visited by the proper authorities any time now (knock, knock...).

    Just my $0.02. Very much tongue-in-cheek. CmdrTaco will be sending me the usual check for $0.02 at the end of this month...

    --
    Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good! - Me.
  26. Pay Rob Malda or we'll ddos the site before you by t0qer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    can read it is basically what this plum means. I think it sucks personally. Why didn't you implement a cache system?

  27. do -NOT- allow early "normal" posting by Splork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you allow paid subscribers to post comments in stories early you are asking for trouble. your moderation system does not work. whoever posts first always has the best chance of getting rated up no matter how stupid they are.

    don't allow people to pay to sway the masses.

    take a hint from kuro5hin, early posts into stories should only be -editorial- comments meant to make suggestions to the editors. they should disappear when the story goes live.

  28. Re:no kidding by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree with most of what you said, except this:

    "Lose the moderation system. It doesn't work, and never has."

    If you don't like it, ignore the mod scores. You can just read at -1 unsorted if you want.

    And IMHO, if you think reading at -1 unsorted is the same as reading at +2, highest first (which is exactly what you're saying by stating "It doesn't work"), you're on glue.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  29. Re:Hah! First! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A benefit of this SHOULD be that paid subscribers should be able to mark a story as a dupe before it goes live, giving the editors time to take it down.