Slashdot Mirror


Digital Movies, Analog Oscars

Kappelmeister writes "The idea of giving Andy Serkis a nomination for The Two Towers is gone, but not forgotten. This New York Times article (FRRBBB) examines the many fine lines that the Academy must draw in the coming years: how physical must the set design, the cinematography, the acting and -- as in the case of Donald Kaufman -- the writer be before a film is shunted into a specialty category like "Best Animated Film?" I think that they will continue to fork with the times; there used to be separate Oscars given out for "one reel" vs. "two reel" shorts, color vs. B/W cinematography, and even director vs. assistant director."

9 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Well.. you know what they say... by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In times of war, distract the public with bread and Serkises....

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  2. Oscars already ignore porn by product+byproduct · · Score: 0, Funny

    If Oscars ignore BOTH porn and sci-fi, they are dead.

  3. Andy Serkis must be the only "fake" actor who.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    had to thrash around in a freakin' cold stream for ages.

  4. Re:Non-digital actors get a lot of help, too. by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now-a-days, good movie editors can make the worst child actors in the world look like geniuses. Just nip and tuck out all the legitimate bad acting, and you got yourself a "Best Actor" nomination.

    Tell that to George Lucas. But then, maybe that was the edited version of Jake Lloyd's performace as Anakin in the Phantom Menace.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  5. 3D Awards show. by aagren · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder when we will see a 3D animated Academy Awards show, where Gollum himself could walk up to the podium and thank his animators, the actor who made his moves be so realistic and the computer which raytraced him so well :)

    1. Re:3D Awards show. by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Funny

      No way, Gollum's got to lose the award, so he can jump onstage and bite into the winner, leaving them with a nice bloody stump while Gollum goes through his "thank-yous" while holding the precious statuette...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:3D Awards show. by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Academy... We would like to thanks it, we would.

      NO! Trickies they did, for giving it to Paul Newman... We hates it forever!!!

      Now WE have the precioussss... yes yesssss...

      --
      My father is a blogger.
  6. Re:Suggestions Please For New Award Categories by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'll add:

    Best Marketing
    Most Hype
    Biggest Budget
    Most Credits
    Silliest Out-Takes

    and perhaps a special category for "Most Gratuitous Use Of The Word Fuck"

    --
    Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  7. Re:Andy Serkis Doesn't Deserve It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Gollum's case, I don't believe make-up would have been enough. Gollum is a very inhuman character, his proportions aren't human and, probably more important, he's very thin. He's aways described this way.

    The big problem with make-up is that it always makes the wearer bulkier, never thinner. Oh, and if you do figure out a way to make someone thinner with only makeup, contact the cosmetics industry, you'd make a mint.