Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Innovators Contest

lisam writes "Have you created a Mac OS X application, plug-in, or some other type of innovative software that you believe is top in its class? Then check out the Mac OS X Innovators contest. Prizes include a ADC Premier Membership, WWDC pass, pass to the O'Reilly Mac OS X Conference, etc, etc. You can enter more than once, but the deadline is March 28, 2003."

13 of 40 comments (clear)

  1. Coding on Non-Mac by Hellraisr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there any way to create a Mac application without actually owning a Mac?

    1. Re:Coding on Non-Mac by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. You can buy CodeWarrior, and the Win32 version (at least, all the ones I've bought!) have all the Mac SDKs you need, including PowerPlant. Obviously, you won't be able to debug from your windows machine (not directly, anyway!).

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    2. Re:Coding on Non-Mac by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 3, Informative
      You could also use GnuStep and write your app in objective C. I'm not sure about the current state of GnuStep, But I've seen apps written using it compile on OSX.

      You'd probably need to borrow a mac for making sure everything compiles and works ok in OSX but you could get surprisingly far (and have a working linux app) without it.

    3. Re:Coding on Non-Mac by jweatherley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To get an exmpale of the RealBASIC horrors that await you Windows users get over to perversiontracker. The URL is safe - it's a play on versiontracker and not some fetish update site...

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    4. Re:Coding on Non-Mac by mbbac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, you could write the application in Java.

      --

      mbbac

  2. Should I enter this??? by heldlikesound · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've written a small, yet (I think) innovative content management system (read: fancy blog) on OSX using Apache, PHP, and mySQL all in my humble little iBook. However, the rules seem a bit vague. The submissions:

    "May be an application, an application plug-in, System service, device driver, code library, kernel extension, user interface widget, or anything else of a similar nature."

    Anyway, it runs and was developed on OSX, so does that make it eligble???
    --


    Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
    1. Re:Should I enter this??? by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let the judges be the judge! Seriously, if you think it's eligible, submit it. Make them reject it :) They may even tell you why!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    2. Re:Should I enter this??? by usr122122121 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Make them reject it :) They may even tell you why!
      If that wasn't a very clever jab at slashdot, I don't know what is :-)
      --

      -braxton
    3. Re:Should I enter this??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wouldn't bother. If you read the link, you'll see that applications will be based on 4 criteria (criteria 1-3 get 20 points each, criteria 4 is worth 40), and winner is highest culmulative score out of 100. Here are the criteria:

      1) Ease of Use -- Does the software deliver ease of use, including installation (Drag Install where appropriate), troubleshooting, easy completion of tasks, stability, clarity of displays and messages, smooth, uncluttered interaction with the user, etc?
      How easy is it to install MySQL, PHP and setup Apache? Not that difficult if you know what you're doing, but definately not for the "drag n' drop" crowd.

      2) Adherence to the Mac OS X Human Interface Guidelines -- Does the software comply with, for example, the Aqua layout guidelines, system appearance (including anti-aliased display of text), and correct organization of menus and use of keyboard shortcuts?
      If this is one of the criteria, then it looks like you'll probably get a "0" in this one... maybe you've done something to mimic a regular Aqua application, but why bother?

      3) Use of Mac OS X Technologies -- Does the application make use of relevant technologies (i.e. Quartz, Quartz Extreme, Velocity Engine, Rendezvous, Core Audio, AppleScript, ATSUI, MLTE, QuickTime, Apple Help, Etc?)
      Looks like another fat "0" in this category... none of the technologies you listed are Apple-brewed.

      4) Innovation -- Is the software a new, category-defining type of product with unique, groundbreaking features, functions, or interactions for Mac OS X? Does the application deliver a highly innovative solution to a common problem or set of problems faced by users? This is perhaps the one category you might be able to get a decent score in, but is another blogger "category-defining", "unique" or "groundbreaking?"

      Sorry to burst a bubble, as I have written a blog-type application as well and was dissapointed by the criteria.

  3. Tight deadline by sporty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tight deadline, but I know how I'm gonna win. Instead of doing one project and doing it well, I'll do a ton of little projects with good intentions.

    How will I win?

    VOLUME! VOLUME VOLUME!

    Sorry.. too much caffine.. damned Sprites ;)

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  4. Winning entries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ..will have their ideas ripped off and incorporated into other products!

    I know, it's tired, but it still annoys me.

  5. Unsanity by owlicks58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sure hope the guys at Unsanity pick up some prizes. They have had the most polished little helper apps/preference panes for OS X. I use Silk, Windowshade, Fruit Menu, and Shadowkiller all from them, couldn't get by without that stuff.

    --
    -Alex
    1. Re:Unsanity by capmilk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prizes for Unsanity software? No. What they deserve are prizies. ;)