Slashdot Mirror
Mandrake 9.0 for AMD 64-bit Technology
Wister285 writes "Mandrake Linux has released a version of their operating system that is compatible with AMD's 64-bit x86 architecture. This version is based upon Mandrake 9.0. In addition to this, Mandrake announced Corporate Server 2.1 for AMD64 to be released in April 2003 and MandrakeClustering for Opteron in June 2003. Although they say that you can download the operating system now, I cannot find any FTP servers. The press release is located on Mandrake's website."
Enterprise server is proprietary. You have to pay for it. Enterprise server isnt like Red Hat's standard linux distibution which is free.
Choose wisely you must...
You can download ES from RedHat's site after you've paid it. You can get the same RedHat minus the Orcale and clustering from any of RedHat's mirrors, just without support, and only a year of updates
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
I did find what looks like the x86 64 bit version, but it's dated 2/12/2003, so I'm not sure if this it it.9 .0/x8 6_64/
ftp://ftp.rutgers.edu/pub/mandrake/Mandrake/
the mandrake control center was very handy for my laptop running 802.11b PCMCIA, and the install was very smooth on my ThinkPad. However, in the end, I still ended up switching over to a different distro simply because I wasn't happy with the package management. The defaults were giving me no end of trouble for my perl modules, and overall I felt i could get better performance out of a more customizable (from the outset, such as Core Linux or Gentoo) distro. So while I think they are fine for a great many users, Mandrake turned out not to be my thing in the end. Also, I recommend against Apt4RPM on mandrake...bad experience on my wifes desktop box with that.
In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
Small correction, the Linux kernel hackers announced their intention to support Hammer before MS did. MS followed suit in this case.
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
If you dont think AMD consulted MSFT with every step of the design process, you're nuts.
If MSFT wasnt going to support Hammer, they wouldnt have developed it.
The company names their flagship CPU line "Athlon XP" and you dont think they have very close ties inside Microsoft?
heres a link for you anyways From april of 2002. I'll even read the opening line for you.
"AMD confirmed Wednesday that it will collaborate with Microsoft to tune Windows to run on its upcoming family of Hammer chips. "
A google of "microsoft" and "hammer" should get more hits.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
Motherboards, Blades and even a peek at Win64 at CeBit
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Opterons (SledgeHammer) come out in April. Athlon 64's (ClawHammer) have been pushed back to September, likely because AMD wants to be damn sure they have the SOI fab space to meet Opteron demand and because the good ol' Athlon line has been extended further than previously expected (Athlon 3000+, etc).
It's critical for AMD to clobber the Intel Xeon. Opteron can do that. Without the fat margins from overpriced Xeons, Intel's ability to engage in desktop/mobile CPU price wars without gushing red ink will be significantly constrained. Works in theory.