Live Vorbis Streams Over 802.11b From SXSW.com
chupacabra writes "SXSW.com in Austin, Texas has a group of computers in various music venues around town. The ices/icecast stream is sent over 802.11 to a main server at SXSW. There are 6 venues running as of this moment. Thanks to the folks at Vorbis and their CVS we are rocking.
See sxsw.com/music/livestreams."
But how long until it gets harassed by the RIAA for paying the music fees ?
UPS Sucks
..thinking about the RIAA, 802.11b streaming music possibilities, and the fact they're a leader in residential WiFi equipment !
The sound quality sorta sucks. It not vorbis's fault - I can't really hear artifacts. It's just the mics/equipment/soundcards they're using, I guess.
It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
I predict this service will fail. After all, who would possibly be interested in listening to music broadcast via "radio waves" ?
In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
True, without WMP support, Ogg has no chance.
... hmmm, maybe some hardware players, too, or at least some handhelds / PDAs that can play this newfangled format. And maybe if people in the music industry take notice of it, that would help -- but that's asking a lot, eh?
Unless they decide to support this crazy upstart format in some other player -- WinAmp would be a good start, since a lot of people use WinAmp. Maybe if they put Ogg support in WinAmp, and if some games start to use it (showing that it's a useful, sustainable format for professional developers), and
If any of those things happen, I think Ogg Vorbis has a chance. But I guess it's toast for now.
Oh. Never mind. As Number One once said. "Ahem. That, also, has already happened."
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
SXSW.com in Austin, Texas HAD a group of computers in various music venues around town.
To me, any time we start developing a technology which can be freely used by all without worry of the letter in the mail, its cause for celebration.
They are testing it, and the better the tools we have in the box, the better we can do a job. And thats the end result isn't it? Getting from here to there with a minimum of effort.
I use the efforts of others daily, and it is my hope that before I leave this planet, I can leave something for others.
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
I think you misunderstood...
They're not using WiFi to let people tune in, but rather to broadcast it. Since it looks like they're doing five different streams at a time, and I'm willing to bet that those places don't have the most accessible internet connections, they're using WiFi Texas to get a connection to each club. There, they've got G3 computers running Gentoo and some streaming software going. After it's encoded, they use the wireless to send it to their XServe (also running Gentoo), which streams it to the internet at large.
Personally, I think this qualifies as being "cool."
My question is would the RIAA be involved in this? If the artists they are broadcasting on this station give them permission to do this. Wouldn't it be out of the RIAA's hands, since the artist gave them permission? I know there are bands like the Grateful Dead, Dave Matthews, and Phish who allowed live recording at their shows fre of charge. You just have to bring your own recording equipment.
It seems to me a lot of posts deal with streaming music over 802.11b to the end user.
However, I took this to be kinda a portable internet brodcasting expirement, in that their ISP is a wireless one. Thus, just like your local radio station can broadcast from a bar during a live performance, so can these fellows. The difference being they dont have to be at a venue that came pre-wired for internet.
As a means of delivery to the end user, I agree, why complicate things with making it an internet stream when there is good ol FM.
However, as the way I saw it, its bringing some benefits that an FM station can have to the realm of an Internet station.
-bart
The player you need (if on Windows) is Winamp 2.81, it could be that RealAudio owns the m3u filetype, but if you can point .m3u to Winamp, it will work.
The 802.11b link is only used for one stream per stage, the icecast server takes this one stream and sends it out to thousands of users at once over a wired LAN. So far, the capacity of the server has not been met. We would like to know what the limit is.
If were to roam onto the WiFi network (ssid = wifi-texas), then you would actually get your streams from the icecast server, not from the stage system directly.
Because of distance limits, Line Of Sight problems, and other factors, three or four wireless hops connect each stage to the icecast server.
hope this helps.
wouldnt make a difference to general listening but it is definitely an innovation. Think of the possibilities :
What if they could ask what song the users would like to be played next and switch accordingly based upon wishes of the majority ?
What if they could generate a system where people could rate songs over the same Wifi (using PDAs maybe) and systems are in place to determine what might be played next.
What if they are able to transmit the mp3 tags of the songs also so that you can rush to the CD store and get the album for that one song ?
Siggy Say, Siggy Do