Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Security, Telephony, Solicitude

Slashback with more on Linux telephony, Mailblocks' terms of service, the scary disease known as SARS, the status of civilian GPS accuracy and more -- read on for the details.

A good oversight to correct. AndyMan! writes "Regarding yesterdays 'Building A Better Inbox,' I got the following email from support@mailblocks.com:

"'Our apologies, we picked up an old version of our TOS when we went live. We will NOT be allowing 3rd parties to send unsolicited email to our userbase. Please check the site this evening for the updated and correct TOS. We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience.'"

All the government you pay for. dunng808 writes "Despite frequent speculation to the contrary, Security Enhanced Linux is alive and well. Government Executive Magazine has a report from a conference on open-source software at which Peter Loscocco, a senior NSA scientist, revealed that the agency has continued to work on SE Linux despite efforts by Microsoft and the Initiative for Software Choice. "We spent a lot of time educating our managers, who accepted a lot of the flack that has come back to NSA about SE Linux," Loscocco said. For those readers trying to win acceptance of open-source software in the workplace, what effort have you undertaken to educate management, and what has worked?"

Also safe for now is GPS. As an anonymous reader writes, "Following last week's thread on GPS, and the possibility that the Pentagon might goof around with the civilian signal, Forbes checks in with the folks in charge and finds we have nothing to worry about."

OK, both of these things involve series of coherent vibrations in air ... A few months back, we mentioned that TheKompany was selling software to let Zaurus owners use Net2Phone for telephone service, and that they were working on a desktop version as well. Well, now it's ready. HeUnique writes "TheKompany just released tkcphone for the Linux desktop. This is the first product which lets Linux users to use their existing net2phone accounts to talk either through net2phone to net2phone or net2phone to standard POTS phone with the best audio quality (G.729 codec)."

And in almost-but-not-totally-unrelated news, jackjumper writes "Shawn Gordon of The Kompany fame has started his own record label, ProgRock Records. From the interview at Linux and Main: "The idea...is to provide progressive rock music to listeners at a low price while allowing more of that money to find its way to the artists' pockets than happens with conventional recording contracts and at the same time making a gesture -- you know the one -- to the established recording cartel." This sounds really cool."

A deadly pathogen by any other name. waytoomuchcoffee writes "The leading hypothesis for what is causing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) is now thought to be a coronavirus, one of the virii that can cause the common cold. The New York Times (archive version for those non-members) has a story here. The global toll is now more than 750 stricken and 22 dead. Singapore is quarantining hundreds of people in an effort to stop the outbreak, while the head of the city's hospitals has taken ill with symptoms consistent with SARS. Both the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization have pages up now, which include FAQs and progression information."

How many times do we have to go over this? Vajsvarana writes "The major free Desktop Environment GNOME and KDE has released a common open statement on recent XFree86 troubles. 'Innovation should happen in the open, with all affected parties able to participate early in the process' seems a clear and strong request to XFree86 people."

28 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Mailblocks MAY Spam You by waldoj · · Score: 4, Informative
    Some how I don't feel better by Mailblocks' assertation that they're not going to spam users. Their privacy policy says:
    Not now, but in the future, Mailblocks may permit third parties, such as advertisers, to furnish our members, through the Services and otherwise, with information from time to time.
    So, were they lying to us before, or are they lying to us now; and if now, in which instance are they lying?

    -Waldo Jaquith
    1. Re:Mailblocks MAY Spam You by DCowern · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even more disturbing to me is the following:

      WE RESERVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO:

      * Change the terms and conditions of this Agreement;
      * Change the Services, including eliminating or discontinuing any Services; or
      * Change any fees or charges for use of the Services.

      Any changes we make will be effective automatically immediately after posting such changes on the Site. Your continued use of the Services following such changes will be deemed acceptance of such changes. Be sure to review this Agreement periodically to ensure familiarity with the most current version. You can determine when this Agreement was last revised by checking the "Last revised" legend at the top of the Agreement.

      Basically, they're saying that without notice, they can do whatever the hell they want with your information and it's up to you to go and find out. Even if you happen to check a few minutes after they change the TOS, they've probably already sold all your info to 3rd parties. Since this probably contains your home address and phone number, it could affect you even after you stop using the service.

      If they wanted to be reasonable, they could change their policy to allow them to make changes only if they notify you one week in advance via a message to your mailblocks account.

  2. SARS by DjMd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good news is this virus seems to be close contact only (family memebers, health care workers) and does not seem highly infectious...

    Now if they could actually confirm which bug it is and get a good test then we would be good shape...

    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
  3. SARS and chinese gov by gsmb · · Score: 3, Informative

    being in china now i am getting really concerned about SARS. while i am a long way from the epicentre the gov here is very quiet and now there are reports of possible infections in beijing...http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/singapo re/story/0,4386,179331,00.html if beijing becomes a new epicentre for spread of this then we are ALL in deep sh*t cos its such a big city (i think 13m+) the first thing that will happen is that everyone will want to LEAVE in different directions WHAT A DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN. i cant imagine the chinese gov (as with any other) preventing the spread. no way of "patching" this one!

  4. KDE and GNOME by YokuYakuYoukai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's really nice to see unified support by KDE and GNOME on this issue. The way they have been getting along lately i would'nt be supprised if we saw some joint projects...

    1. Re:KDE and GNOME by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
      The way they have been getting along lately i would'nt be supprised if we saw some joint projects...

      That would explain why LinuxCon is being held in Amsterdam....

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. Initiative for Software Choice by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Initiative for Software Choice seems like a whitewash organization backed by Microsoft.

    It seems to me that every time it becomes politic to get somewhat more relaxed towards Microsoft, lest you draw mocking cries of 'Linux zealot! Stallman Fanboy!' that Microsoft turn around and prove to everyone just how justified the ire against them is.

    Here are a few choice quotes:

    "Policymakers should not make rigid intellectual property licensing choices a precondition for eligibility for procurement, nor should they discriminate between developers that choose to license their intellectual property on commercial terms, and developers that choose not to charge licensing fees...."

    "Lately, concerns have emerged that policy makers, through government procurement policies, research funding or standards policies, may seek to favor one software development model over another."

    I won't bother with any more.

    The scary thing about this organization is that their party line appears to be quite subtle. Where they fail is that they appear to be up in arms about purchasing regimes which haven't happened yet.

    They also use their contentions to subtly dig at the GPL... 'rigid intellectual property licensing' indeed. I wonder if anybody at the Initiative for Software Choice has ever tried to install Windows 2000 in Application Server mode. THAT is 'rigid licensing' at its best.

    MH

    1. Re:Initiative for Software Choice by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here are a few choice quotes:

      "Policymakers should not make rigid intellectual property licensing choices a precondition for eligibility for procurement, nor should they discriminate between developers that choose to license their intellectual property on commercial terms, and developers that choose not to charge licensing fees...."

      "Lately, concerns have emerged that policy makers, through government procurement policies, research funding or standards policies, may seek to favor one software development model over another."


      Those seem like quite reasonable statements to me. Are you suggesting that policymakers should force the Gov't to purchase only GPL'd software? Or release Gov't funded R&D only under a GPL license? Either of those would be unacceptable and every bit as bad as preventing the Gov't from using GPL'd software as the pro MS zealots seem to want.

      Pro Choice vs. Viral Licenses or is it Monopoly vs. Pro Freedom?

      Both sides are becoming as obnoxious as the fanatics trying to co-opt the language in the Pro Choice vs. Anti Choice, uh, err, I mean, Pro Life vs. Anti Life abortion debate. No room for a middle ground. No sense that the other side might have some reasonable concerns that are worth listening to.

    2. Re:Initiative for Software Choice by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading the commentary literally, I have no issues with their contention whatsoever.

      Reading between the lines, doesn't it sound like more subtle versions of what Microsoft has been saying about the GPL the whole time?

      Why even mention software development models unless they're trying to cast aspersions on the Open Source model?

      Why even mention the poor abused software developers who 'choose to license their intellectual property on commercial terms'?

      Someone has a beef, and it's neither the procurement departments nor the open source people. Last time I checked, the open source guys were so disorganized they couldn't organize a piss up in a brewery, let alone lobby procuring departments.

      Face it. This is subtle MS FUD. Very subtle MS FUD.

  6. Infection rate by Thumb-One · · Score: 5, Insightful

    22 dead out of 750 infected is definitely not insignificant. Assuming a rate of 20 deaths out of 1000 infections, and a 30% infection rate, equals what, 150k deaths in the US? Not trivial.

    --
    This is only a test Sig. If this were a real Sig, it would be witty, pithy, or rude, just like all the other Sigs.
  7. This is where Microsoft executes extremely well by RonBarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ya gotta hate 'em, but they know how to do this. No direct slams at open source or linux, just very friendly, helpful suggestions that offering users choice is better than not, isn't it? They've been doing this for decades. If it weren't for the other crap, you know, the illegal immoral stuff, I might even like the bastards.

  8. GPS is having problems by thogard · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are many areas in the world that are having problems with GPS but its not due to jaming, its due to the fact that there isn't a full constilation up. PRN 22 went dead a while back and hasn't been replaced. The current plan is to spread out the sats in that orbital ring (the B plane) to help fill up the gap but that will result in more outages in more places for short times compared to the current 1/2 hour outages seen directly in the flight path. The NavCen are recomending that you change your mask angle to 5 degrees if its set higher (many people use 15 degrees).

    Right now you can see the problems on this map (mirrored here). The black areas are where GPS isn't going to give a 3d position and the red areas are where it wont get a 4d (3d+time) fix. The dark blue will have issues if any part of the sky is blocked. I don't think I've seen the GPS status this bad for a long time. Maybe its time to launch a few new navstar sats.

  9. My story by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Funny
    For those readers trying to win acceptance of open-source software in the workplace, what effort have you undertaken to educate management, and what has worked?

    Well, I told the manager that it was free. He squinted. Then I told him there was no support, but if he opened a port to an IRC server we could get by. He squinted a little more. Then I told him it doesn't really run any of the software we use. He squinted even more. Finally I told him we'd have to use Java or something because .NET doesn't really run in Linux. It will soon, though! He was beginning to look like a japanese psycho on speed by then, so fearing for my job I backpedaled out of his office, bowing a few times and muttering something I heard on the Iron Chef the other day that sounded important. To this day he's not speaking to me.

    That's my story. Anyone else?

    1. Re:My story by digidave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here goes:

      I told my manager Linux was free, and his eyes opened wide. I told my manager it was more stable than our NT 4 servers, and his eyes opened wider. I told my manager that I would have better, easier, remote management, and his eyes opened wider. I told my manager Linux would still run our Websphere software and that IBM provided a free migration path (no new licenses), and my bosses eyes finally popped out of their sockets.

      I'm not being a Linux zealot. Everything there -- except for his eyes popping out -- is true. We just migrated 3 web servers to Redhat. It was an incredibly easy process and we're already seeing dramatic stability improvements despite a severe coding bug that cause us some downtime. I have never managed a Linux server before, but I'm not having any trouble learning it, with a bit of online help.

      While your .NET apps won't easily port, who says .NET is better than Java anyway? I'm no Java fan, but I've done some Java web app coding and some .NET development, and .NET is no better.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:My story by vadim_t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then you didn't tell well.

      It's free, but you can pay for it.

      You don't get support for free, but you can buy it, from RedHat for example.

      Wine and vmware might be useful in *some* situations.

      And, it's not a silver bullet. For example, I considered rewriting a VB app in PerlQt and running it on Linux. Turns out it wouldn't work because we'd have to migrate from SQL Server as well. So what to do? Very simple.

      Tell your manager that while Linux is not currently a viable alternative for your business it's growing fast, and that you can make changes slowly to make moving to it easier if you ever need it, since vendor lock-in might mean serious problems for the company in the future. For example you could try Postgres for a small non-critial DB. You could try to make a database that could be moved to Postres with little effort. You could get Cygwin and/or use Perl to automate tasks. You could try using Linux on your mail server, DNS server or web server.

      Then, if some day MS takes a way you don't like it'll be much easier to switch to Linux.

    3. Re:My story by keyslammer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm. Sounds a lot like one of my stories!

      Only I like to come in with the "I need $1200 to purchase this commercial package - unless you want me to use this competing open source package, which IMHO is a better product anyway" angle.

      Last project I was on, management was blown away by the stability of our Linux servers. Even the Windows guys were impressed. When I left the group, they were using Linux as a dedicated DB/2 server platform (wouldn't switch their web servers because of the VB/.NET thing).

    4. Re:My story by technos · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like to come in right after the Microsoft rep has been in..

      "He wanted us to do what?!? XP on the desktops? They're P2s with 64M of memory! Replace the NT servers with 2K just for the new proxy server software? $16 grand?? Plus client licenses? He said he thought we might have overused our Windows 98 liscenses? How about I just snag a couple 486s from the junk bin, toss a copy of Debian on em, and we call it done? Oh, cost? You owe me a six pack of beer to drink when I'm doing it. Support? What do you have me here for? Its not like you've ever actually called Microsoft. No. You call me."

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  10. SARS predictions by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SARS is likely to be as bad as a smallpox epidemic. The Chinese are stonewalling, that's bad, and the Hongkong authorities are trying to play it down so it won't hurt tourism. These idiocies will get us all in trouble. I predict that this virus will hit Silicon Valley hard; I've seen a lot of techies, especially foreign 'guests', just not practicing simple hygiene like washing hands coming out of the restrooms, sneezing widely into the air, etc. Also, the disease hit China, and so much manufacturing is now there, so there are plenty of chances for it to be contracted and brought back to the US. I think we have a real problem coming. Don't fly unless you wear a respiratory mask, either. I suspect SARS is a two-component disease; first you are hit with the new mutant virus, which sets up your immune system to fail to handle certain things, then the second virus characterizing this disease attacks you unhampered. We do not have any effective way to combat that.

    1. Re:SARS predictions by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      SARS is likely to be as bad as a smallpox epidemic.

      Bullshit. I live in Hong Kong, so I think I have more of a clue about this than the sensationalist overseas reports.

      Yes, it can kill. But so far, all those infected were in close physical contact with carriers -- mostly health workers who treated them, or members of family. Here people are crushed in close contact on public transport every day. If it spread like smallpox, we'd have a million dead already. It's risk, but nothing to obsess over.

    2. Re:SARS predictions by tfoss · · Score: 3, Informative
      SARS is likely to be as bad as a smallpox epidemic.

      Hold on there nostradamus, how on earth could you have an rational basis for that kind of claim?

      I predict that this virus will hit Silicon Valley hard; I've seen a lot of techies, especially foreign 'guests', just not practicing simple hygiene like washing hands coming out of the restrooms, sneezing widely into the air, etc.

      Nice vague tinge of racism.

      Also, the disease hit China, and so much manufacturing is now there, so there are plenty of chances for it to be contracted and brought back to the US. I think we have a real problem coming.

      Except everything so far suggests this virus (if it is) requires close respiratory contact with infected people. Breathing on a tv that will be boxed, packaged, shipped and left on a ship for weeks hardly counts as close respiratory contact.

      I suspect SARS is a two-component disease; first you are hit with the new mutant virus, which sets up your immune system to fail to handle certain things, then the second virus characterizing this disease attacks you unhampered.

      Again, on what basis do you make these wild-ass statements? Do you work in a research lab studying SARS? When those researching this aren't even ready to make this kind of statement (they say it's possible, but by no means proven, and always stated as 'might,' 'could,' 'would be unusual,' &c. ), how are your prescient enough to?

      We do not have any effective way to combat that.

      True, just like we don't have any effective way to handle the vast majority of viral infections we get. We let our immune system go at it, and more often than not we get better.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    3. Re:SARS predictions by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      I only get my Singapore news from your own local newspaper,

      As I said, I'm in Hong Kong, which is not Singapore.

      The Straits Times itself is reporting how many parents are clamoring to close the schools for a while

      People are panicking. Has little to do with the real risks. Recall the idiocy with which AIDS sufferers are treated in most places. Actually, my dusghter's school has just closed, which is a case of bureaucratic CYA rather than anything else.

      SARS is highly contagious in close proximity, as is smallpox. Look at what WHO reports.

      I did (before I made my original post). I didn't see anything to contradict what I wrote. It is MUCH less contagious than smallpox, and MUCH less lethal (7 dead out of 222 confirmed cases). It's been here for two weeks (incubation period is a few days or a week) and if it was anything like as bad as smallpox, hundreds would be dead.

      WHO SARS FAQ:
      Q : How contagious is SARS ?
      A : Based on currently available evidence, close contact with an infected person is needed for the infective agent to spread from one person to another. Contact with aerosolized (exhaled) droplets and bodily secretions from an infected person appears to be important. To date, the majority of cases have occurred in hospital workers who have cared for SARS patients and the close family members of these patients. However, the amount of the infective agent needed to cause an infection has not yet been determined.

  11. The Difference Between Military and Civilian GPS by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Informative

    What the Forbes article fails elucidate is the difference between military and civilian GPS. Not only is the military GPS on a different band, and considerably more accurate, but it's also encrypted. In fact, SOP if an aircraft is shot down is for the pilot to press a "data destruct" key that formats internal memory storage so the enemy doesn't get ahold of any information on the military band. The encryption keys are also changed daily.

    BTW, both military and civilian GPS can increase the accuracy of the signal by using differential GPS, which uses stationary ground stations to reduce uncertainty to well under an inch.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  12. Re:"Viruses," Not "Virii" by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "STFU, not STFES.

    Learn More." [reference.com]"


    LOL! Burn!

    Heh. That made my day. I'm tired of being corrected on stupid things like the difference between "viruses" and "virii". Normally I wouldn't mind, but once you've studied latin it's hard to avoid the urge to call it 'virii'. I wish people who use that term would be cut a little slack, it's not like we're all posting with spell and grammar checkers here. Afterall, this is just a forum. It's not a Scholastic Competition. When you correct somebody on use of a term that nobody could possibily mistake, you just sound like an arrogant ass, especially when done with such little tact.

    Okay, I'm done ranting. Please spare me your ill-based theory that if people don't speak 100% correct English 100% of the time that we'll all end up communicating via a series of grunts and moans.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  13. Re:"Viruses," Not "Virii" by clueless_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Okay, I'm done ranting. Please spare me your ill-based theory that if people don't speak 100% correct English 100% of the time that we'll all end up communicating via a series of grunts and moans.

    The proper form is gruntii and moanii. Sheesh.

    --
    Use the spatula, Luke
  14. How is SARs more dangerous than AIDs? by frank249 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow 750 infected and 22 dead. How about the millions dead from AIDs? This study says that after 22 years of education 14.7 percent -- one in seven -- of gay and bisexual black men ages 23 to 29 become HIV-positive each year. Since the discovery of AIDS -- first reported in a 1981 government health bulletin as a strange form of pneumonia -- there have been about 750,000 reported cases in America. Nearly 450,000 of those patients have died.

    The Washington Post reports that world wide there are now 42 million people living with HIV infection and by 2010 there will be between 50 million and 75 million cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in India, China, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Russia alone.

    Why was AIDs not decleared a contagious disease back in 1981 and infected people quaratined? Were the rights of a few worth more than the rights of 75 million?

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:How is SARs more dangerous than AIDs? by srw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more dangerous because I can virtually assure myself not getting AIDS by not having sex, not sharing hypodermic needles, and avoiding other peoples' blood. I can sit next to an HIV positive person in an airplane without any danger of getting AIDS. The same CAN'T be said of SARS.

  15. GLONASS and the EU system by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised we don't see more folks making dual mode GPS/GLONASS systems.

    GLONASS, for those of you too lazy to Google it, is basically GPS-ski - it's the Russian answer to GPS. Same basic idea, but at a different frequency.

    That's important. The biggest reason a military GPS receiver is still more accurate than a civilian rig is that the military rig uses 2 frequencies - the first is the frequency the civilian rigs use, the second is a military only frequency and is encrypted.

    The reason this helps accuracy is that the ionosphere bends radio waves, including the GPS signal. Since the signal does not take a straight line path, it travels a bit farther. How much farther - aye, that's the rub. Unless you know what the ionosphere is doing you have no idea.

    However, the amount of bend is propotional to frequency - if you use 2 different frequencies, you can determine the difference between them, and thus the amount of bending the ionosphere is adding.

    Now, back to GLONASS - being on a different frequency, if you used it plus GPS, you could, in theory, get the same information about the behavior of the ionosphere, and reduce the error. (In practice you wouldn't get the same level of accuracy since the signals are not coming from the same birds, but...)

    I've seen some chipsets in the trade journals that do both, but I've not seen any consumer units that do so.

    And the .eu is starting to set up THEIR OWN system. I cannot say I blame them - I'd want my own system as well, were I them.

    So, if we could only get a triple-threat system....

  16. There is no fight by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

    The purpose of my desktop is to fight against Microsoft?
    I think not.
    I want to get work done in a timely and cost effective manner not be part of a Jihad.
    I'd be rather upset if the people contributing were all fucked up with "must beat Microsfot, must beat Microsoft" rather than "must write good code, must write good code"

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter