Slashdot Mirror


AI in Sci-Fi

An anonymous submitter writes: "Stumbled upon a pretty interesting article considering the idea, 'What would machines do if they did achieve sentience?' It's by a sci-fi author I haven't heard of but worked with Kubrick on AI, he takes the whole AI or sentient machine idea a little further than we normally see in film."

5 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Singularity by arvindn · · Score: 4, Informative
    The thesis of the singularity is that this question can not be answered.

    The idea goes as follows: If a self-aware "real AI" ever existed, one capable of self-understanding and self-modification (called the seed AI), it would be in a much better position to create AI than its original creators. So would begin a chain of self-refinement and the creation of progressively smarter intelligences with decreasing time gaps between stages. Eventually a point is reached, called the singularity: nothing about the future past the singularity can be predicted by humans who live in the pre-singularity world. A common interpretation is that the chain of AIs would become more intelligent without bound, leading to a verticality.

    The singulaity was first popularized by Vernor Vinge.

    I've been doing a lot of reading on the singularity lately, and I've become more and more convinced that it is certain to happen.

    More singularity links:
    The singularity institute - A nonprofit working to hasten the singularity
    Extensive writings by Eliezer Yudkowsky.
    I've myself written a bit on singularity and AI related topics.

  2. Re:Answer is obvious by 56ker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, not everyone knows what an actuary does. An actuary is a statistician who computes insurance risks and premiums (usually they advise management on other issues too - for instance how an increasing life expectancy will affect how much the company pays out in pensions). It wouldn't be very difficult to write a computer program to answer an actuarial exam correctly as maths is the one thing computers are very good at. However you would end up with the computer getting 100% in a nanosecond - then twiddling its thumbs for the next two hours - waiting for the humans to catch up with it. ;o)

  3. Buddha by KDan · · Score: 4, Informative

    unless you're a Buddha seeking to negate the self

    It's a common misconception that Buddhism is just about "negating the self". In fact, the purpose of it is precisely to be able to do what you want better. A buddhist also has a self and has desires, needs, etc, just like any other human being. The difference is just that he's aware that those are desires and needs and he has more control over them. He also has the discipline to listen to his intuition to decide whether a particular desire is worth pursuing or not. But he's not some empty zombie that doesn't desire anything.

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
  4. Re:You mean what would they do if they were sapien by blair1q · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. Common sci-fi misunderstanding.

    Sentience is the ability to sense. Some plants are sentient. Sapience is the ability to reason. Most mammals have limited sapience.

    Self-awareness is a specialized skill in the scale of sapience.

    Defining self-awareness is a circular and fuzzy propostion. My CPU knows how warm it is and can change its operating speed to protect itself, but does it really know? Converseley, many humans don't have any understanding of how they behaving.

    This makes it good for skiffy writers. They don't have to worry that someone will call them on their central conceit. It's ineffable.