Slashdot Mirror


From Turkey Guts to Fuel Oil

Untimely Ripp'd writes "The latest issue of Discover Magazine reports that any day now a plant will go online in Carthage, Missouri that processes turkey guts into high grade oil, natural gas, some minerals, and water. Unfortunately, the Discover article isn't online yet, but here's a newspaper article. The system, developed by Changing World Technologies uses thermal depolymerization and apparently works on almost any and every kind of organic waste. They assert that applying it to 100% of the US' agricultural waste would produce about 4 billion barrels of oil per year -- about the amount we currently import. It sounds too good to be true, it sounds like one of those fly-by-night-in-the-face-of-the-second-law deals, but it isn't happening in somebody's basement -- it's happening in a multi-million dollar facility developed with Con-Agra."

32 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. When you think about it... by CommieLib · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is really just fossil fuels for the extremely impatient.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  2. I feel let down by antaeogo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was expecting that evil 'bit' story...

  3. This is wonderful by madfgurtbn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Something like this could really help reduce our dependence on foreign oil. I betcha the oil industry is going to try to discredit this breakthrough in energy technology.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    1. Re:This is wonderful by mgs1000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've heard the the oil industry has already issued a press release stating this was a hoax.

  4. And I thought... by Marley · · Score: 3, Funny

    petro products stunk... I bet this smells much more foul... ;)

  5. Paranoid by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so paranoid, I can't tell if this is another April Fools or not!

    1. Re:Paranoid by nurightshu · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate April 1st.

      Try having today as your birthday. Jesus. One time, when I turned nine or ten, my best friend handed me this big freakin' box. I unwrapped it, and there was another box inside of it. Unwrapped that one, and lo and behold, another box. Three or four more iterations, and I unwrap the final box. It contains...two decorative soaps (shaped like seashells).

      "April Fool!" he says.

      I knee him, right in the balls. He goes down and I'm following him, punching his head repeatedly. My parents come rushing over and pull me off of his crumpled form. Chuck E. Cheese employees are freaking out, and so are all my other friends.

      I found a new best friend shortly thereafter, but that didn't stop the pranks. Every year, somebody thinks it'll be clever and original to do something stupid, then shout, "April Fools! Happy birthday, Mike!"

      My temper's under better control than it was when I was nine. I don't beat them up anymore. Now I have sex with their spouses.

      Happy birthday. Happy frigging birthday to me.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    2. Re:Paranoid by Trogre · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, I remember this one time I sent my kid along to his friends April 1 birthday party.

      The birthday boy was such a good friend that we decided to buy him two royal $700 decorative soaps, hand carved by an Italian designer, as a special investment gift, but wrap it in a great big cardboard box to make it look like a television set or something. (just for a little 1 April prank).

      Turned out the prick of a birthday boy actually beat my kid up, so badly he needeed stitches. Last I heard the soaps were never seen again.

      Hey wait a sec... where do you live?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  6. Why bother? by dmuth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why bother with a plant for this? I can already turn chili into ah, "natural gas". :-)

    1. Re:Why bother? by warpSpeed · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why bother with a plant for this? I can already turn chili into ah, "natural gas"

      Add some beer or whisky, and you get "natual gas" under high pressure...

      *bada ching!* I'm here all week, and watch the open flames.

  7. Not Apr fools joke? by langedb · · Score: 4, Funny

    The date on the article was Dec. 4, 2002, so I think this one is legit.

  8. This will drive up the price of Thanksgiving! by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does it mean we'll have to invade Kentucky next?

  9. Strangely... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
    This does not look like an April Fool's joke. Thereby leaving everybody who expected the headline involving turning turkey guts into fuel oil to be a joke thoroughly stumped for clever things to say.


    My guess is that the Slashdot eds thought it _was_ an April Fool's joke or they wouldn't have posted it today. If they repost it a second time within the next two hours though, we'll know it must be true.

  10. April Fools by Phoenix823 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just a plan to let President Bush take care of all those PETA wackos. You see, by making oil from turkeys, he'll surely upset any self-righteous PETA member. They'll boycott the new oil and continue to use oil from the middle East, and consequently they'll be supporting terrorism. Thankfully, the Patriot Act will allow the government to lock up these proponents of terrorism for an indefinite amount of time at an undisclosed location.

    Now finally, we may all eat meat without fearing harrassment.

  11. Springfield??? by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This wouldn't happen to be an expansion of the "Little Lisa Slurry Factory" would it?

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  12. typo by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    that's "fowl."

  13. Bad day for a good story... by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 4, Informative
    I wonder how many people will write this off as an April Fools joke. I've only skimmed The Discover article, but it is an extremely optimistic piece, and the writer seems chagrinned that he couldn't present a more skeptical case. If this technology was widely deployed it could almost eliminate foreign oil dependence.

    The article also talked about no increases in carbon in the environment because oil isn't pulled up from underground, it's created from biological waste (carbon already in the environment). I believe there was a quote in there along the lines of "every living thing becomes a little carbon sink".

    Warren Buffett is an investor (via ConAgra) and the field tests should be done by 2005.

  14. From Baby Seals to Fuel Oil by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    (1) Club baby seal
    (2) ?
    (3) Oil!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  15. Why it took so long? by NorthDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    why has it taken so long to get here?!

    We call this a tradition, this is in the Slashdot culture...
    You are new here, aren't you?

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  16. Re:Or outlaw it like hemp by ip_vjl · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the "Hemp for fuel" site:

    When burned in a diesel engine, biodiesel replaces the exhaust odor of petroleum diesel with the pleasant smell of hemp, popcorn or french fries.


    Wow. Back in college, I didn't realize so many of the guys in my dorm had biodiesel engines in their room.

  17. Not a Joke. by blunte · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend reported this story to me in detail 2 or 3 days ago in great detail.

    There are two plants either in operation now, or just starting up. One is right next to a Butterball Turkey factory.

    The process breaks organic materials down thru some process of super-hydration, 500 degree heat, some moderate amount of pressure, and then results in various oils and water (clean enough to go into normal treatment plants).

    Also, oil companies reportedly support this because the novel approach is actually easier and cleaner for processing crude oils than existing refineries. So they stand to gain from this as well.

    There's a lot of good info on this, so don't discount it just because /. posted it today.

    I hope it's a huge success.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  18. More info by lub · · Score: 4, Informative
  19. Economics of disposal/recycling by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But [James Stoffer] added that while the plant may be a "tough go" economically, it's worth the investment because of what it promises for the environment.

    If such companies actually paid fines for breaking environmental laws by polluting with livestock wastes, they would not find reprocessing a "tough go" economically. Unfortunately, the EPA doesn't have the balls to go after even the most blatant of violators, and thus the food-processors get away with murder.

    When Con-Agra rolls out such zero-emissions factories everywhere (As William McDonough writes of in Cradle to Cradle) I will happily invest in their stock and buy their products.

  20. Re:Or outlaw it like hemp by The+Zody · · Score: 3, Funny

    i am now going to commend the pizza man on his care for the enviorment! i always wondered why he smelled so odd...

  21. old news by constantnormal · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... if you do the following google: "(waste OR trash) into oil"

    you will find similar articles, mostly from the summer of 2001 ?!!?. (Google cached story from Kansas City Tribune)

    Either the people involved are doing a series of pilot plants in scaling this up, or somebody's dragging their feet. Or maybe it's just a case parallel developments utilizing similar technology -- but it sure sounds like the same thing.

    The prospect of $14/barrel high-quality oil (the cost quoted in Discover) while providing an environmental service should have the capitalists breaking down the doors. It seems like they're taking a leisurely route to large-scale exploitation -- what's going on here?

    Shouldn't we have oil companies partnering with ConAgra and building refineries adjacent to slaughterhouses? Or at least set up a pipeline to a refinery?

  22. vegetarians/vegans? by nesneros · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will we have to start selling "vegan-friendly" fuel now?

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
  23. Re:THIS IS NOT AN APRIL'S FOOLS DAY STORY by nanojath · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's not an April Fool's day story, and it isn't exactly new news - it's another process for converting biomass (the use of turkey as the prime example is unfortunate because it promotes the hoax claim, but given the article was originally published early December it was probably a post-Thanksgiving kind of novel angle thing.


    There are a lot of biomass reduction techniques going on to produce combustible fuels. As the article states they all run into the same problem - economics. Nature did all the heavy work on crude oil for us - so naturally from the perspective of in the ground to a watt or a mile or whatever, the price of oil is hard to beat, particularly given its enormous infrastructure advantage. Even if you're using "free" feedstocks (i.e. wastes) the processing cost can be a killer.


    So, for these fuels to make any impact, they generally need to be subsidized somehow. The article makes it clear that the economics of this fuel source are far from proven.


    There are little startups like this all over the place. So far none of the techniques developed have made a serious impact on our use of oil. Without real public and government support for changing our energy base, this one probably won't either.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  24. Danger: side effects may vary... by rocjoe71 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Automobiles, upon filling the tank with turkey-petrol, tend not to be drivable and prefer to doze on the couch watching NFL football.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  25. In Philadelphia� by scotay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since Changing World Technology installed their "turkey" depolymerization pilot program, we're swimming in oil. The dramatic upturn in oil revenue, combined with the sudden, unexplained drop in the number of homeless people (and now pigeons) has left the city coffers flush with funds in an economic downturn. And let me tell you, Con-Agra's Soylent Gold runs with less pinging than any of those premium over-priced gasolines.

  26. Oh really? by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lock them up you say?

    Wouldn't it be more efficient to use them to fuel your SUV?

    Amoco/BP Green: It's People!

    (that's funny on multiple levels...think environmentalists, vegetarians, "BP" stands for British People, Soylent Green...pure comedy gold!)

    --
    ...
  27. Good but overrated by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are some substantial differences (good and bad) relating to this method.

    1) Using biomass means that all carbon embodied in the fuel is from CO2 relatively recently removed from the atmosphere. Petrolium products when burned dump carbon into the carbon cycle (CO2->Plant Biomass -> many possible steps (optional) -> decomposition -> CO2. This is good because biomass fuels don't increase CO2 levels in our atmosphere as fossil fuels do.

    2) On the negative side, there is a lot of fuel involved in raising, the turkeys (equipment relating to feed, transport of feed, raising the turkeys, transporting them, slaughtering them, transporting the guts to the factory, etc).

    My suspician is that we will see it use less fuel than transporting the guts of the turkey to the factory, processing them, etc. and since these parts are currently unused, it will ge a good thing. However, I suspect that we will not see a net fuel gain from this process (more fuel will go into raising/transporting feed, etc. than you will get out of the turkey) and so it can only subsidize the fuel cost of raising a turkey, not completely even mitigate that.

    That being said, I am all for it. I think that if we looked at methane digesters for manure of all marge animal farms, this sort of project, etc. it would reduce our petrolium consumption and allow us to leave a smaller ecological footprint.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  28. Re:not a joke - and NOT the same as biodiesel by valkraider · · Score: 3, Informative

    This synthetic hydrocarbon fuel is different from biodiesel by two major things: no engine adjustments necessary to run on this fuel

    No adjustments are required to run Biodiesel in any diesel engine made in the last decade or so. The problem is that Biodiesel can eat through some old types of rubber used in seals and fuel lines. Modern diesel engines do not use these types of rubber. Older engines could be retrofitted just by changing out old rubber lines, maybe needed anyway if the car is old enough! The only other thing is that biodiesel will dissolve engine deposits, since American diesel no. 2 is dirty, there can be a lot of deposits. If you have driven a while on regular diesel, biodiesel can lossen deposits, which can then clog fuel filters. Diesels have to replace the fuel filter pretty regularly - so it shouldn't be much of an issue.
    Check out Biodiesel.org or BioDieselNow.com for more info.

    Lots of Volkswagen TDI owners use Biodiesel.

    To remain on topic - there is a plant near Salt Lake City, Utah that is doing something similar to this. Smithfield Foods Inc. will be making BioMethanol from pork waste.