Slashdot Mirror


New XCOR Rocket Engine Passes First Test

apsmith writes "XCOR Aerospace just successfully test-fired their new liquid oxygen/kerosene rocket engine. This is significantly more powerful than the engines used in the XCOR EZ-Rocket vehicle, and will be further developed for use in the Xerus suborbital vehicle. XCOR is one of the serious X-Prize contenders, and partly funded by John Carmack of Id and Armadillo Aerospace (Carmack's in-his-free-time X-prize contender)."

4 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Cost Effective? by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Funny
    So, will this be a cost effective way to launch Lance Bass into space?

    Note that omitting a reentry vehicle could substantially save on fuel costs.

  2. What do you reckon.. by nath_o_brien · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...their new liquid oxygen/kerosene rocket engine

    What do you reckon the chances are of me being able to get hold of one of these babies for my car?

    --
    - Welcome the coming of the New World Odour
  3. Re:Vacation Time by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny
    One step closer to having honey moons in space? Wooo

    This is slashdot. Maybe a PERL conference in space, but not a honeymoon.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  4. Re:Danger??? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm no scientist, but I am aware that liquid oxygen or LOX as it's reffered tho happens to be compressed oxygen (approx. 4000 times the amount that in the air), and this will dramatically increase the speed that a shuttle will be incinerated during a disaster, as the LOX will feed the explosions.

    The current shuttle uses liquid oxygen, by the way, along with(surprise) liquid hydrogen. Together they fuel the orbiter's engines. The boosters on the side are solid-fuel motors and once they're lit, they don't go out until the fuel's burned.

    Incidentally, every rocket fuel of one kind or another has to have some oxidizer, or it won't work in space(think that one through.) Most rockets for non-space applications have oxidizers, too, because it's hard to get oxygen from the air mixed in with fuel fast/well enough to be useful(this is why ramjets were so 'neat', they don't need to carry oxidizer, but can generate enormous amounts of thrust at incredible speeds.)

    The orbiter also uses hydrazine for the auxiliary power units and firing thrusters(I think), and a half dozen other things that go 'boom' or are very nasty. That's the whole point behind rocket fuel- burning it has to release a LOT of energy for its weight.