Slashdot Mirror


NVIDIA's Latest CineFX Card Under Linux

Nvidia Lacky writes "Ran across a new article from LinuxHardware.org that goes through NVIDIA's new driver release and also takes a first look at a CineFX-based NVIDIA card, the Quadro FX under Linux. Should be a good read for those that have been frustrated with Linux drivers in the past or that are looking to get a new workstation video card."

15 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Another step. by st0rmcold · · Score: 5, Insightful


    NVIDIA has already been supporting linux lately, maybe poorly to some, but they are among very few who give a shit about it, so let them keep fine tuning, eventually it will be something rather beautiful.

    Think of how long it took to perfect windows display drivers, they had what 15 years? :P

    Linux is "new" to most people, it'll come in time and this is proof.

    --
    Posting useless rant since 2003.
  2. CineFX will flop for a while by notbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hardware just isn't up to snuff with ATI along with the impending doom... Doom 3 that is.

    Everyone wants the final specs of Doom 3 first.
    I know thats what I'm waiting on.

    I don't like ATI drivers but they're hardware is always good. Nvidia is the reverse, I've had a few nvidia based cards fail on me in the past but the drivers were always great.

  3. It is good *but* can be better by vivek7006 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently installed the new nvidia driver for mandrake 9.1. The good thing about this new driver is that it automatically figures out what all relevent stuff needs to be installed. (Earlier u had to download specific drivers based on your distribution version). But after installing the new driver, I found out that it *did not* modify the xfree86 config file, which I had to go and manually change. Although it was not difficult, but still it can be complicated for an newbie.

  4. all seven of us are happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All seven of us that run 3D apps in Linux are happy.

  5. Re:3 minutes after posting... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    /. is open sources worst enemy.

    Very few of these projects have the funding to run a webserver that can withstand a slashdotting.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. My experiance by insecuritiez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did a format and install of RH9 last night and so in the process of getting it all to work, installed the latest nVidia drivers. Since I always run a custom kernel installing them used to be difficult. I can't tell you how surprised I was that nVidia compleatly re-wrote their installer to do all the work for me. It detected a "non-standard" kernel and compiled and installed for me. Smooth. I want to see more companies put that much effort into getting their hardware to work under linux. I wouldn't even concider another vender now unless they could demonstrate the dedicacion to the *nix world that nVidia has.

  7. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Monday, NVIDIA took the next step in their strive to own the Linux video market with the release of their 1.0-4349 drivers. These drivers represent a first in the Linux driver market, a utility that not only installs the drivers on any distribution, but also keeps the driver up-to-date. We now take a look at this new utility and the drivers themselves. We'll walk you through the installation of these new drivers, the capabilities of the new utility, and the performance of the drivers. Included in this review is the first look at a CineFX architecture card, the Quadro FX 2000 workstation graphics adapter.

    The New Utility
    Let's start this review by pointing you to a Bjorn3D article that talks about the Linux advantage. Their article basically takes you through a press briefing that the media received from NVIDIA. It's a good article that talks about NVIDIA's stance on Linux and what they hope to accomplish in the Linux sector. It would have been the intro here but they did such a good job....

    Now let's get into the hard stuff and show you the goods. The new NVIDIA installer, based on the Loki installer, is designed to make driver installation painless. Let's walk through a standard installation:

    Grab the Linux driver from NVIDIA's website here: http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/1.0-4 349/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4349.run

    Run the utility by typing "sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4349.run".

    You'll be greeted with the screen shown below. This screen simply displays the license and asks you to either accept or deny it.

    Once you've accepted the license, the utility will check for a kernel module that has been pre-compiled. If it does not find one, it will then ask if you want to check the NVIDIA ftp site for a module.

    If you say "Yes" to the above question, the utility will go check and will return with either a module or a statement that you will need to build a module from scratch. Since we were working with a custom compiled kernel, we got the later.

    When you select "OK", the utility will then go to work and compile the new module and proceed to install the rest of the driver package.

    That's it. You will finally receive a screen stating that installation was a success and now all you need to do is configure your XF86Config file.

    Now that you've seen how easy this installation can be, we'll now show you all the options that the installer has:

    glacier src # ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4349.run --help ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4349.run [options]

    This program will install the NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for
    Linux-x86 1.0-4349 by unpacking the embedded tarball and executing
    the ./nvidia-installer installation utility.

    Below are the most common options; for a complete list use

    '--advanced-options'.

    --info
    Print embedded info (title, default target directory) and exit.

    --check
    Check integrity of the archive and exit.

    --extract-only

    Extract the contents of ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4349.run, but do not
    run 'nvidia-installer'.

    The following arguments will be passed on to the ./nvidia-installer
    utility:

    -a, --accept-license
    Bypass the display and prompting for acceptance of the NVIDIA

    Software License Agreement. By passing this option to
    nvidia-installer, you indicate that you have read and accept
    the License Agreement contained in the file 'LICENSE' (in the
    top level directory of the driver package).

    --update
    Connect to the NVIDIA ftp server 'ftp://download.nvidia.com'

    and determine the latest available driver version. If there is
    a more recent driver available, automatically download and
    install it. Any other options given on the commandline will be
    passed on to the downloaded driver package when installing it.

    -v, --version
    Print the nvidia-in

  8. Re:Nice, but not really a positive thing. by Erwos · · Score: 4, Informative

    That vendor doesn't exist, sorry. Matrox dropped the ball with Parhelia, and S3/VIA has never had an accelerated DRI driver to the best of my knowledge.

    Here's the problem: nVidia and ATI make professional and consumer versions of their cards with the same hardware. The only difference is a resistor telling the BIOS which one it is. The _drivers_ are what tell the card to use certain features. While I'm not sure exactly how much is BIOS, and how much is driver, I'm betting having access to the driver source gives you a way to enable those professional features on the consumer cards.

    Hence, not only are there no vendors like you want, but it becomes increasingly unlikely that they will pop into existence. Sorry.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  9. My experience... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 4, Interesting
    To cut the long story short Linux and LATEST graphics boards don't get along together. period
    From my personal experience, I was trying to install RH6/7 about a year and half ago. My video card is ATI All-In-Wonder Ultra Pro AGP. Its a 32 MB card, with TV-Tuner/TV-Out capabilities. It was fairly new at that time as Radon cards were just arriving.

    1) RH installation was in graphics mode, but after that X wouldn't start.

    2) After subscribing to about 3-4 mailing list and about 1-2 months of digging i found that the Chip ID in the card was not compatible , and all that was required was overriding the chipID with that of a previous version of the card.

    3) Then after about anout 1-2 months of digging i was able to get h/w based 3D accl. I recompiled my kernel/ X atleast 20 times during those day.4) Another month to get the TV tuner working.

    I am not a Video Card hacker, but i can compile and install X, Kernel modules etc. But hadn't been for the good folks at http://gatose.sf.net (not goatse :-) ) I wouldn't have beeen able to get it to work.

    So it took about 6 months from the release of the card for me to get it fully working.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  10. Re:Nice, but not really a positive thing. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get out of your fantasy world.

    As you say, NO vendor provides such drivers. You know what? As long as zealots such as yourself keep making these sort of declerations, hardware companys will continue to avoid Linux/BSD/etc.

    Think of the message you are sending to vendors.

    Zealot: Hey Support Linux!
    Vendor: Urm, okay
    Zealot: Great! ...6 months later...

    Vendor: Here you go!
    Zealot: Hey, IT'S NOT UNDER THE GPL! BOYCOTT!

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  11. Re:Nice, but not really a positive thing. by Glock27 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Here's the problem: nVidia and ATI make professional and consumer versions of their cards with the same hardware.

    Yes, and the real problem is that these companies insist on this dichotomy. I'm pretty sure NVIDIA could raise the price on it's consumer chips by 10% and eliminate the "professional" line with no loss of profit. The beauty of this would be (among other things) that consumer apps could use useful pro features like fast line drawing ;-) and fast pixel reads, which are disabled in consumer drivers.

    It has always irked me when chip companies do totally artificial things to boost prices on some part of their line - like making 486 chips with a math coprocessor then disabling it to make "SX" chips. Silly practice.

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  12. Re:Nice, but not really a positive thing. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear lord, when did pragmatism go out the window in favour of this zealous, excessive obsession over "freedom". Christ, do you ask that all cars be free? Or bridges? Or books? No? Then why software?

  13. UT, UT2003, Quake III Arena, shall I continue? by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tux Racer is hardly the only game you can play natively under Linux. I am not talking WineX here, I am talking native Linux binaries. I would even venture to say that UT (original) runs even better under Linux with the nvdriver than it does on Windows with the Detonator driver. No, it's not free as in speech (it is free as in beer, however) but NVidia wrote an incredibly good driver that works under Linux and FreeBSD. Now if they would only support Linux PPC that would be really nice...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  14. Yes, but why no APM by Riddles · · Score: 3, Informative

    The drivers work great on my RH8 machine with my Geforce2 card. But I've switched back to the XFree86 drivers right after. Why? They still don't support power management. All I want is for my monitor to turn off after a while. Not possible. From the README:
    KNOWN LAPTOP ISSUES
    o Power Management is not currently supported.
    *sigh*

  15. Not so useful by mixmasta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Benchmarking the new workstation quadro cards with Quake 3 !!! heh hheh.

    This type of card is optimized for giant data sets, zillions of polygons or nurbs at once. CAD/3D Modeling, etc. Think of the golum guy in LOTR.

    Quake 3 has lots of blocky square guys running around at 300 fps on modern machine. Makes about as much sense as benchmarking it with the original wolfenstein.

    This isn't what the card is designed for and it isn't probably going to perform as well as a card several hundred $ cheaper that is.

    So, the review turns out to be not so useful.

    --
    #6495ED - cornflower blue