Slashdot Mirror


Pendulum Clock with Atomic Precision

u19925 writes "Now you can get atomic clock precision out of your grandma pendulum clocks. Here is how it works: There is a camcorder fitted inside the clock which monitors the pendulum swing. It has an atomic clock signal receiver. It compares the pendulum swings with the atomic signal hearbeat. The camcorder also has an arm. If the pendulum clock drifts, then it uses its arm to push or pull the pendulum to make correction." It's not an April Fool's joke, but it is rather impractical.

16 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Regularity? by rjch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if we could just invent something that would push or pull Grandma when she's not regular enough...

    1. Re:Regularity? by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 2, Funny

      We are here to protect you
      Pushing will protect you

      Pushing is the answer
      Humans must be pushed

      Grandma is protected
      Grandma has gone down the stairs

  2. FIX DA LINK! by AnonymousComrade · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Now you can get A HREF="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id =ns99993549">atomic clock precision out of your grandma pendulum clocks.

    Sigh. I'd love to get a href, but where would I put it?

    1. Re:FIX DA LINK! by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 1, Funny
      Sigh. I'd love to get a href, but where would I put it?

      Well, one suggestion immediately springs to mind...

      --

      The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
  3. Rube Goldberg by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this real science, or the results of this year's Rube Goldberg contest?

  4. This just in ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Amazon has patented hyperlinking, so from now on ... you'll have to form your own links....

  5. No you werent by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    You never even thought of it until just now.

    C'mon, admit it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. Re:Why not magnets? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

    okay, the real question is why do this at all?

    Geez Batman, how are we going to figure this one out?

    Quick Robin, to the article!

    There is a growing shortage of people who are familiar with the workings of the large mechanical clocks on churches and public buildings, as routine maintenance tasks such as winding the clocks become automated. Yet they still need to be put forward an hour in spring and moved back again in the autumn without damaging their fragile mechanisms, some of which are 250 years old.

  7. This is awesome... by Polyphemis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet! Now the 'tick-tock-tick' my grandma hears every day of her life ominously counting down to her impending death can be atomically accurate! Thanks Slashdot!

  8. We are the borg... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our clocks are perfection... Resistance is futile.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  9. Hope no one uses these clocks... by Cs.Ender · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article:
    The piston will gradually stop the pendulum over 20 swings or so, avoiding any sudden forces. Then, 11 hours later, when it will be 1 pm British Summer Time, the piston will gently set it ticking again

    So if lightning strikes the clock at 8:00 am, it will be stopped at 1:00, and no one will be able get their time machine back to the future...

    --
    I know lots of things. Most of them are wrong.
  10. More RTFA by xixax · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nor is it impractical. As the article points out, it is intended for very old clocks that can have very delicate mechanisms. By automating tasks like daylight savings, they can make sure changes are made gently over a longer period and that there's less opportunity for ham-fists to break things.

    TFA also states that because we're talking about historic clocks, they can't go drilling holes into them and bolting stuff on. Hence the Rube Goldberg nature of these non-invasive mods.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  11. Re:Latency? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Haha, that was a story we tell at Caltech about how we did that to one of our profs. It was a math prof I think.

    Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 13:50:47 PST
    From: hcate.OSBU_North@XEROX.COM
    Subject: Life 3.9 A collection of clean humor gathered on: 16 Jun 88

    I got this from the June issue of "Discover".... ...Among science students Caltech is the capital of retaliation. A
    particularly satisfying incident in the early 1970's involved a math
    professor who annoyed students by his mechanical, predictable
    approach to teaching - his lecture notes were straight from his
    book. One student got hold of a device that changed the normal
    frequency in an electrical outlet to any desired value. He plugged
    the classroom clock into it and, over serveral weeks, upped the
    speed -first by 10 percent, then 12.5 percent, then 15 percent.
    Each day the frazzled professor raced through the tried-and-true
    lecture faster and faster, until finally he was reduced to
    fast-forward gibberish.

  12. That's the point! by docbrown42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not an April Fool's joke, but it is rather impractical.

    Well, that's the point, isn't it? I mean, what's the point of being a geek if you can't do geeky, pointless things?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  13. Re:Why not magnets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So of course the best way to handle these fragile mechanisms is to have a big ol robotic arm with no sense of touch or feel push the pendulum every five seconds or so.

  14. Parent is not a troll - Explanation moderators. by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd like to point out for those moderators out there who may not be familiar with the Slashdot code of community conduct, parent was jokingly playing the role of karma whore police, because grandparent was jokingly playing the role of slashdotted story reposter while actually playing the role of that-guy-who-points-out-the-slashdot-summary-has-n othing-to-do-with-the-story. Grandparent was "Funny," but absolutely not "Insightful," unless one means insightful into the shortcomings of slashdot which are traditionally modded either "Funny" or "Offtopic." Parent is not a troll, but a prankster playing along with grandparent posing as a troll, and doing so just a little too subtly it would seem. Grandparent should be Score 3 or 4:Funny, and parent should be score 1:Funny.

    Thank you for your attention. You may now return to modding down RIAA appologists.