RIAA Seeks Estimated $97.8 Billion From MTU Student
theodp writes "The Detroit Free Press does the math on the damages sought by the RIAA from the Michigan Technological University student. The total? About $97.8 trillion--yes, trillion with a T--or enough money to buy every CD sold in America last year over again for the next 120,000 years, according to RIAA statistics." Update: 04/05 21:58 GMT by M : The Free Press can do the math, but not very well: the numbers provided show the RIAA is seeking some $97 billion dollars, not trillion. I'm sure the student is *much* happier. Headline updated.
Um...downloading a copyrighted work without paying for it is stealing. Just because I downloaded some licensed software and "borrowed" the license key doesn't mean that I didn't steal it. I still comitted a crime.
The RIAA has every right to protect its interests. Is it a little draconian, perhaps a bit misplaced? Yes.
The simple truth remains, however, that if one offers a copyrighted work to others, free of charge, that is stealing. It does not matter that the theft happens electronically or physically.
By your logic, embezzling from a bank is not stealing because I did not actually go to the bank and take the paper money. Your arguement is so soft and juvenile that one might think you are justifying your guilt.
Also : Not that this is a justification of my downloading mp3s, but I wouldn't have bought probably 3/4 of the mp3s I have because I simply want one song off of the CD.
Now if you take a normal one-hit wonder with one CD, and 20,000 people that want that one song, if half downloaded it from a file sharing service, and don't buy the album, is that not a significant loss to the producers and artist? I am just not going to buy that 1 Bloodhound Gang CD to hear "The Roof is On Fire"
I come, not praise Ceasar, but to bury him, but not with weak, nonsensical arguements.
Just think ... with all that money the RIAA could afford sharks with freekin laser beams mounted on their heads!
Does it make you special to state your "side"? No really, you're not adding to the discussion nor are you humorous. What a waste of a post!