Slashdot Mirror


Endless Liquid Refreshment

rabtech writes "I'm very lazy. As part of that continuing effort, I've come up with a guide for installing a soda fountain in the house. I've detailed how to get the equipment, hoses, and supplies, as well as how to install and calibrate the system. Now you won't ever need to move for lack of liquid refreshment! My next project: Food Replicator."

17 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. hmmm.... by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 3, Informative

    As if people aren't fat enough...an endless supply of extra calories, extra sugar, and easy dehydration from too much caffeine. I'll install a water fountain: I perfer to keep my teeth and not get fat.

    1. Re:hmmm.... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "I'll install a water fountain: I perfer to keep my teeth and not get fat."

      One thing that is underrated is getting a dedicated water jug and putting it in the FRIDGE to keep it really cold. Over the last month or so I have gotten addicted to this. We have a RO Water Purification System at home (RO = reverse osmosis) because there's cauliform and iron in the well from which our home's water is drawn. (I live in a farming area, each house has its own water pump feeding it instead of a city grid.)

      Really good quality, really COLD water is REALLY good. And I never guilty about pouring myself another glass. This is really worth a try!

      The only downside is that you get spoiled. During weekdays, I live in Toronto at a place I am renting and the water tastes horrid to me. I have to bring bottles of it from home every week. And then there's the water in Quebec City... (shudder)

  2. One important thing to note... by iwillrefuse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had my own soda machine setup in our old house for a couple of years. While the appeal is definatly there, cost savings should not be among them. The stories you hear about "the cup costing more than the actual soda" is competely false While it is slight cheaper than purchasing 2-liters, after doing the math, it really only has a cost savings of about 20%, assuming your paying around $40 per pre-mix box, and $15 or so for the CO2. It is damn cool though, and the chicks dig it.

    1. Re:One important thing to note... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 4, Informative
      assuming your paying around $40 per pre-mix box, and $15 or so for the CO2
      You're getting ripped off, then. It may be because you aren't buying in bulk, or piggy-backing off a volume order.

      Pre-mix runs us about US$15/box and CO2 is provided free o' charge. The cost per 20 oz cup is about US$0.015... hardly close to the US$0.99/litre bottle.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    2. Re:One important thing to note... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Informative

      I gotta go along with Safety Cap. When I owned a bar my incremental cost of making a 12 ounce soft drink was slightly over four cents. And they supplied the gun and the rest. And if I had a problem they would send someone out to fix it for free. I was buying more than you, of course, but not a huge amount.

  3. Better drink lots of soda by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for one of the vendors listed on that site. We sell every part you could possibly need to do something like this, but we don't sell to home consumers or even individual restaurants. We're a sister company of the largest manufacturer of fountain soda machines in the world. So, working were I do, I've found out a fair amount about these machines. We have about 90 employees in our office and haven't installed a fountain machine because with so few employees the lines would get coated with syrup in no time. You really need a larger volume of people, or you will have to flush the lines all the time. Personally, I say just get yourself a Culligan water dispenser and save your money and teeth. If you really need soda, buy 2 liter bottles.

    --
    I was not touched there by an angel.
  4. even lazier by trmj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, I'm too lazy to find all of that stuff and then go install it.

    So, I found this instead.

    It seems like it should work just as well and have only a minimally higher cost, but the up front cost is much much less (~$500 vs. ~50).

    w00t for extended laziness!

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  5. Beer-delivery equipment is expensive... by Goonie · · Score: 1, Informative
    My sister used to run a hotel. The gadgetry to dispense beer is extremely expensive, particularly the refrigeration gear to serve the beer at the appropriate temperature.

    In any case, if you're going to go to the effort of a beer tap at home, why not go the whole hog and have it dispense Chimay, preferably Chimay Blue? Not only is it wonderful drinking - it's about 10% alcohol... :)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  6. Re:Even more impressive by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 4, Informative
    Not really. A basic setup for dispensing beer at home runs about $200. Beer is even simpler to serve than soda: there's no on-the-fly mixing. Add a few extra bucks if you want the special sparkler head that makes Guinness look so nice.

    If you don't intend to brew your beer, it's even less, because you don't have to buy the kegs to put the beer in the first place.

    So yes, that means all you guys out there, it is okay for you to go get that CO2 system to server beer on tap. Really, it's cheap, and it impresses the party guests.

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  7. Re:interesting by theperplepigg · · Score: 2, Informative
    Read the related article at Snopes. In short: Those rumors are BS.

    --paul

    --
    -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
  8. pre vs post - makes all the difference by The+Monster · · Score: 4, Informative
    assuming your [sic] paying around $40 per pre-mix box
    Well, no wonder. You were buying pre-mix, not post-mix. The economics of it are really quite simple: With pre-mix, you're paying to ship water as well as syrup, and therefore occupying roughly 5.5 times the volume of the syrup alone. With post-mix, you use your own water, which is virtually free by comparison. Having done time in the fast food business, I can tell you that the only people who use pre-mix are the ones who don't have a water supply, like the circus concessions mentioned in the article. OTOH, if your municipal water is as bad as mine, you'll want to invest in a home water purification system.
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:pre vs post - makes all the difference by DJPenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Semantics - a pre-mix box could be "pre-mixed" ie, already mixed. Post mix - it's mixed AFTER the delivery. Kinda makes some sense both ways round...

  9. Re:Dentists' goldmine by mesach · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wouldn't it then go

    1. Have coder install endless soda fountain.
    2. coders' teeth fall out
    3. PROFIT!

    since you have the roadmap you don't need the ???

    --
    moo.
  10. Sodamistic by caduguid · · Score: 3, Informative

    You just brought back one of those embarrassing first job moments. Worse than selling vacuum cleaners door-to-door, it was selling home pop-machines! Evil company called 'sodamistic', long-since-defunct, I'm sure.

    A valuable formative experience in the sleazy world of hard-sell direct sales, it lets me watch movies like Tin Men or Boiler Room with an insider's appreciation, and more importantly, it taught me the importance of never ever letting a salesman inside your house. (Not that time-share group sales pitches are much better.)

    For those who are interested, a google search for sodamistic turned up a minor reference in the comments section of this totally on-topic to this story web page: How to Make Your Own Carbonated Soda (Coke, Pepsi, ...).

  11. Re:Even more impressive by dildatron · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Guinness tap I made at home, and you need more than the special stout/restrictor plate nozzle. The other half of the mix is a nitrogen/CO2 mix (usually 75%/25%). It is what gives Guinness it's creaminess look, as well as the cascading shower of bubbles when poured just right. The setup is probably another $150 beyond what it would cost for a normal beer tap (I have both).

    Also, nitrogen tanks are thicker because they are filled to much higher pressue, and thus are more expensive for the tank, as well as the gas mix.

    Still, nothing beats having Guinness on tap at home. Haven't met anyone yet who isn't impressed, especially when I am serving my own brewed beer through it on one spout, and Guinness on the other...

    --


    If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  12. Buy a heart rate monitor by FredFnord · · Score: 2, Informative

    This kind of thing is frequently due to people not having a clue how to exercise and driving their hearts way too hard. Pick up a heart rate monitor for less than $100... Polar is a good brand. Set it for your optimum heart rate speed (the watches come with some relatively good guidelines) and stay in them. Wham, suddenly you're only a tiny bit more likely to die of a heart attack while exercising than you are while getting up from the sofa to get some chips.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  13. FYI regarding diet soda... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not half the calories. It's 1/100 or less. Aspartame (NutraSweet) has approx. the same calories per unit weight as sugar, but is 100-200 times sweeter per unit weight. (It's THAT strong. NutraSweet sugar replacements are 99% inert powder.)

    One would have to drink a few liters of diet soda to even reach 10 calories.

    Calorie-wise, diet soda = water.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?