Slashdot Mirror


Hypernova Erupts as Global Telescopes Scramble

An anonymous reader writes "The remarkable Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment [ROTSE] telescopes have tracked a 2 billion year old hypernova, from which an intense gamma ray burst reached earth on March 29. From Carl Akerlof, the ROTSE investigator: "The optical brightness of this gamma ray burst is about 100 times more intense than anything we've ever seen before." To underscore how the sun never rises on this automated telescope network, the observations switched rapidly from New South Wales in Australia back to Fort Davis, Texas, over a 12 hour burnout of the collapsing black hole."

26 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. GAMMA BURST! Hitting us right now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hide in your basesment and get out your tinfoil hat! ...I'm glad to see many of you are already prepared.

    1. Re:GAMMA BURST! Hitting us right now! by kiggs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now this is what I call SHOCK and AWE! not that tiny stuff using puny little bombs. This is the mother of all explosions!

  2. Too bad.... by tankdilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it was just about to retire the next day. 2 billion years of loyal service as a hypernova, and it erupts just like that.
    Quoted a co-worker, "It's what we call in the nova business retirony."

    --

    -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

  3. Re:a hypernova! by LucidityZero · · Score: 3, Informative

    Which kind of raises the question, why not a meganova, or a giganova?

    Hyper- \Hy"per-\ [Gr. "ype`r over, above; akin to L. super, E. over. See Over, and cf. Super-.] 1. A prefix signifying over, above; as, hyperphysical, hyperthyrion; also, above measure, abnormally great, excessive;

    Meg- \Meg-\, Mega \Meg"a\, Megalo- \Meg"a*lo-\ [Gr. me`gas, gen. mega`loy, great.] Combining forms signifying: (Metric System, Elec., Mech., etc.) A million times, a million of; as, megameter, a million meters; megafarad, a million farads; megohm, a million ohms. br>
    Giga would fit the same defintion as Mega, just.... more of it. :)
    --
    Sig.i>
  4. Re:a hypernova! by zokum · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just wondering, is a giganova 1024 or 1000 times stronger than a meganova :-)

    --
    Rest in peace Malin "looxn" Kristiansen. We miss you...
  5. Good point by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    In astronomy circles - black holes are considered interplanetary BSODs.

    _________
    cheap web site hosting - now with extra donuts.

  6. Old News. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Funny

    This happened 2 Billion years ago.

    Slow news day?

    1. Re:Old News. by ralphclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This might be old news but its certainly *big* news. It's just that the post is a little slow around here (i.e. 3x10^8 m/s).

      Being big news, it certainly raises some interesting questions:

      1). Given the enormous power output of this burst ("more than a million times the combined output of all the stars in the Milky Way" for at least a minute, then falling off) what effect would this have had on any organic life in that galaxy? More specifically, could anything bigger than a bacterium have survived?

      2). Are there any hypernova candidates in our own galaxy or the local Magellanic clouds?

      3). If there are, how much warning will we get before they go off?

      4). Assuming only technologies which don't contravene our current understanding of physics, how long would take us to retreat to a safe distance (the intergalactic void presumably)?

      One can only suspect that this might be one of those theoretical (until now) pan-galactic sterilizing "reset" events. Which might settle the debate over the Fermi paradox once and for all.

  7. Can you get my back? by mcmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny
    "During the first minute after the explosion it emitted energy at a rate more than a million times the combined output of all the stars in the Milky Way. If you concentrated all the energy that the sun will put out over its entire 9 billion-year life into a tenth of a second, then you would have some idea of the brightness," said Michael Ashley, faculty member in the astrophysics and optics department at the University of New South Wales and a member of the ROTSE team.
    George Hamilton rated it an SPF 31 event.
  8. I'll Get The Ball Rolling by DarkZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Carl Akerlof, the ROTSE investigator: "The optical brightness of this gamma ray burst is about 100 times more intense than anything we've ever seen before."

    And five minutes later, after someone accidentally spilled coffee on Dr. Akerlof, angering him, he was quoted as saying... wait for it... wait for it... all together now...

    HULK SMASH!!!

    Let the painfully immature gamma ray jokes begin.

  9. Well... keep fingers crossed by KDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's just hope we don't get one of these anywhere much closer than this, cause otherwise everyone will have a really good sun tan very fast!

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
    1. Re:Well... keep fingers crossed by Janitor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You mean like this one:
      Possible Hypernova Could Affect Earth

  10. Before it gets slashdotted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ** KARMA WHORE MODE: OFF **

    Hypernova Blast:
    Global Chase Ensues
    based on U. Michigan release

    Two billion years ago, in a far-away galaxy, a giant star exploded, releasing almost unbelievable amounts of energy as it collapsed to a black hole. The light from that explosion finally reached Earth at 6:37 a.m. EST on March 29, igniting a frenzy of activity among astronomers worldwide. This phenomenon has been called a hypernova, playing on the name of the supernova events that mark the violent end of massive stars.

    With two telescopes separated by about 110 degrees longitude, the Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment (ROTSE) will have one of the most continuous records of this explosion.


    The changing intensity of a gamma-ray burst. On the left is an image of the gamma ray sky showing the burst becoming the brightest object. On the right is a plot of the changing brightness with time. The first gamma-ray burst was seen in the year 1967 (although it was not reported to the world until 1973) by satellite-borne detectors intended to look for violations of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Credit: BATSE

    "The optical brightness of this gamma ray burst is about 100 times more intense than anything we've ever seen before. It's also much closer to us than all other observed bursts so we can study it in considerably more detail," said Carl W. Akerlof, an astrophysicist in the Physics Department at the University of Michigan.

    Contrary to visible light, gamma rays are non-thermal meaning that they are not produced in hot celestial bodies like the sun. Gamma rays occur in exceptional circumstances such as in the aftermath of a stellar explosion, in the vicinity of black holes, or at the core of active galaxies.

    Just recently, the ROTSE group commissioned two optical telescopes in Australia and Texas and were waiting for the first opportunities to use the new equipment. The burst was promptly detected by NASA's Earth orbiting High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE-2) but human intervention was required to find the exact location.

    Despite sporadic clouds and rainstorms in Australia, the ROTSE instrument at Siding Spring Observatory in northern New South Wales was able to record the decaying light from the blast. Twelve hours later, the second ROTSE telescope in Fort Davis, Texas was picking up the job of monitoring this spectacular explosion.

    "During the first minute after the explosion it emitted energy at a rate more than a million times the combined output of all the stars in the Milky Way. If you concentrated all the energy that the sun will put out over its entire 9 billion-year life into a tenth of a second, then you would have some idea of the brightness," said Michael Ashley, faculty member in the astrophysics and optics department at the University of New South Wales and a member of the ROTSE team.

    Given that the history of astronomy goes back centuries, observations in the gamma spectrum are really among the newest areas in celestial research. The high-energy light is swallowed by the earth's atmosphere yet the light cannot be captured with conventional lenses or mirrors. Special detectors in satellites and high altitude research rockets register gamma rays with energies of up to around ten billion electron volts.


    Gamma rays occur in exceptional circumstances such as in the aftermath of a stellar explosion, in the vicinity of black holes, or at the core of active galaxies. Credit: NASA

    Fortunately for life on earth, a gamma particle from the universe does not penetrate to the earth's surface, but if it flies past an atomic nucleus within the earth's atmosphere, the gamma particle can transform itself into an electron and its (positive) antiparticle, a positron. During its journey through the air, this pair comes across more atomic nuclei and a gamma quantum is generated which then once again hits atomic nuclei. Thus, a single cosmic gamma particle creates roughly a thousand secondar

  11. blindsided by MoFoYa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "To underscore how the sun never rises on this automated telescope network, the observations switched rapidly from New South Wales in Australia back to Fort Davis, Texas..."

    yeah, but if it were september would we even know it happened?
    IANAA but, it seems that even if you always have someone looking into the night sky, it's only half of the sky - you cant see the side where the sun is untill later in the year.

    now if we could somehow drop a satellite telescope behind in orbit around the sun about 6 months behind us and another 3 months behind (for line of sight comms) we could get a more complete picture of our neiborhood year round.

    or...i could be completly ignorant.

    1. Re:blindsided by panurge · · Score: 4, Informative
      You are basically right, but you have to place them at the Lagrange points, otherwise they wander off.

      However, it's much easier just to put the telescope in orbit around the earth. Without atmospheric scattering, the telescope can be aimed close to the sun. That's one of the advantages of Hubble over any terrestrial telescope.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  12. In the make you wonder department. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first of the four images from hubble of the event is about 2 light years across I figure the last of the 4 images they say is 6 light years across.

    Problem is this only happened in March so how did it expand 4 light years in like a few months and how exactly did that expansion happen when some how the burst just reached us over that distance.

    Anyone see a problem here? It expands 4 light years in size in just a few months yet some how the light manages to travel 2 billion light years.

    I can't see how this could have happened, Iv'e been thinking about it since it was posted as APOD picture of the day a few days ago.

    Expansion faster then the speed of light? It don't make sence to me.

    1. Re:In the make you wonder department. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, they explain it in another part of the site: it's something called the superliminal effect. Find the description here:

      http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/light_echo _0 30326.html#update

      and the pretty picture to accompany it here:

      http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay /i mg_display.php?pic=light_echo_graphic_030326_02,0. jpg

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  13. That's Pretty Big by TeachingMachines · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If you concentrated all the energy that the sun will put out over its entire 9 billion-year life into a tenth of a second, then you would have some idea of the brightness."
    The key phrase here is then you would have some idea. Frankly, there is a point in astronomy and astrophysics where things get so big, and so fast, and so bright, that the only idea that remains in one's brain when trying to imagine such phenomena is a white light with a big hand reaching into it. The example above is classic: first I have to imagine 9 billion years (good luck, I can't even remember what happened yesterday) and then I have to imagine a tenth of a second, which is like a total brain fart. And then, and only then, would I have some idea of the brightness. Well, I guess that I would have some idea if my head hadn't imploded while trying to imagine that nanofart called a "tenth of a second." Geezus.

    --

    The Death Penalty: Killing people to show others that killing people is wrong.
  14. Choice of names... by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Funny
    With two telescopes separated by about 110 degrees longitude, the Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment (ROTSE) will have one of the most continuous records of this explosion.

    Fortunately, they didn't call their telescope network the Global Optical Automatic Transient Search Experiment, whose headquarter are in the Christmas Islands.

  15. A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away... by irw · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Two billion years ago, in a far-away galaxy, a giant star exploded."

    The death of star. Death Star.

    I predict they might be seeing a second one of these explosions any time soon...

  16. don't worry about cancer by Gryftir · · Score: 3, Informative

    Would it increase your changes of getting cancer? Shields that reduce gamma ray intensity by 50% include 1cm (0.4 inches) of lead, 6cm (2.4 inches) of concrete or 9cm (3.6 inches) of packed dirt. On the good side, gamma radiation is only as harmful as x-ray or beta particles. This NASA site however says that most gamma radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere, which is why you need balloons or sattelites to really see gamma rays.

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  17. Gamma rays by jandersen · · Score: 4, Informative

    'Contrary to visible light, gamma rays are non-thermal meaning that they are not produced in hot celestial bodies like the sun. Gamma rays occur in exceptional circumstances such as in the aftermath of a stellar explosion, in the vicinity of black holes, or at the core of active galaxies'

    This is of course not true - gamma rays are produced in many places, among other things by Radium, if my memory serves me. And the Sun does indeed produce gamma rays are essentially just high energy photons, just like visible light (and radio waves, for that matter) with 'high energy'. Electromagnetic radiation is quantified in 'packets' called photons, and it is mostly a metter of taste whether you call them radio waves, microwaves, light, X-rays or gamma rays. There's an upper for gamma photons by the way (sort of): a photon with very high energy will tend to 'split' and form a pair consisting of an electron and a positron, which then annihilate in a burst of photons.

  18. optical gamma rays? by X_Bones · · Score: 3, Redundant

    "The optical brightness of this gamma ray burst is about 100 times more intense than anything we've ever seen before."

    Aren't gamma rays by definition not optical (i.e. not in the visible spectrum)?

    1. Re:optical gamma rays? by DJPenguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What would you rather they say... "felt" before? :)

      I think he means "seen" in the same manner as "observed" or "recorded".

  19. Co-incidentally.. by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are absolutely massive numbers involved that it's difficult to realistically comprehend them let alone compare them meaningfully.

    Co-incidentally, I worked out for someone tonight that if the Sun and the Earth were 5 centimetres apart (that's a couple of inches), then the Andromeda galaxy would be roughly 6.7 million kilometres down the road. (About 4 million miles.) And Andromeda's one of the closest of what was most recently estimated to be around 80 billion galaxies.

  20. I swear... by imrec · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rotse. I swear every and any word/acronym/setofcharacters containing o*tse or some form of it has, in my mind, been ruined forever. My first day at slashdot will continue haunt me to the end of my days.

    Thank you.

    --
    Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.