Slashdot Mirror


Webcams to Enforce Singapore Quarantine

magarity writes "Singapore has hired a private security firm to install internet connected webcams in homes of persons quarantined for SARS in order to watch them to see if they go out. They are considering adding electronic wristbands as well. 9 of the 490 persons have broken the quarantine despite a fine of 10,000 singapore dollars ($5,621US). Just over 100 people worldwide have died from SARS so far."

7 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. This is Singapore... by sco08y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before you start on about 1984, this is happening in Singapore, not the US.

    And to head off the inevitable Ashcroft / Patriot Act recriminations, please offer actual *proof* of claims that our civil liberties are being eroded.

    1. Re:This is Singapore... by thelexx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since you brought it up and apparently missed yesterday's thread with FIFTEEN HUNDRED FSCKING MESSAGES on why Ashcroft/Patriot are bad, here's my favorite:

      Re:Not A Joke (Score:5, Informative)
      by bricriu (184334) on Wednesday April 09, @03:39PM (#5695030)
      (http://slashdot.org/)
      You can be detained, without being charged, indefinitely, having been investigated under a sealed warrant, an unsigned warrant, or no warrant at all, and then be denied access to a lawyer.

      And that is un-American. Period.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  2. Re:What's the big deal? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hey dickhead - if it truly has a 4% mortality rate, that will kill 1/25 people.

    thats at least one student in a highschool class.

    at least one person in your extended family.

    it does need to be quarantined, or we are all fscked.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  3. Re:What's the big deal? by Bloodshot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's only 4% because people are acting quickly to try and stop it from spreading. I live and work around Toronto (which is one of the places where SARS has shown up with a vengence in Canada), and believe me, it's a big freakin' deal. I had to go the doctor for treatment of strep throat and there was a form I had to fill out about SARS and every medical person there had a filter mask on and wouldn't go NEAR you until they determined you weren't a SARS risk.

    Like some others have said, how would YOU feel if someone you knew was one of those 4%. I think your knee would jerk pretty high.

  4. Re:What's the big deal? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why are we quarantining people over something with a 4% mortality rate?

    The 4% mortality rate is before all of the hospitals are full and before the world's supply of available respirators is exhausted. If 1,000,000 people in one country catch this, things could be different.

    I'm just hoping that this virus mellows out a little bit as it goes through multiple generations in humans, as some viruses have been known to do. That might be the only way it will slow down.

  5. Flu Pandemic of 1918 - 3 % mortality. by MightyTribble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...which killed upwards of 20 MILLION people, had a mortality rate of 3%.

    SARS seems to be *at least* as transmissible as the 1918 flu was.

    That's why.

  6. Re:It's not that BAD by robbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, it is that bad. Malaria isn't contagious. If SARS isn't contained, then a lot more than a million people could die. Consider what could happen if SARS spread to Africa, where a significant percentage of the population is infected with an immune-suppressing virus (HIV).

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the Phish