Slashdot Mirror
The Hundred-Year Language
dtolton writes "Paul Graham has a new article called "The Hundred-Year Language" posted. The article is about the programming languages of the future and what form they may take. He makes some interesting predictions about the rate of change we might expect in programming languages over the next 100 years. He also makes some persuasive points about the possible design and construction of those languages. The article is definitely worth a read for those interested in programming languages."
I do not know what the language of the year 2000 will look like, but it will be called FORTRAN. -Attributed to many people including Seymour Cray, John Backus
Trolling is a art,
\ Word definitions : convicted-of 0 ; \ To convict someone : murder 25 + ; : arson 10 + ; : robbery 2 + ; : music-copying 40 + ; : sentenced-to . ." years of prison" ;
And to use it:
convicted-of music-copying robbery sentenced-to
Output: 42 years of prison This looks quite like english. Of course, you can do that in many languages, but it feels more natural in Forth I think.
I predict that in 100 years someone, somewhere, will still be running COBOL applications.
And I will still be refusing to maintain them.
Surely that depends on whether you're damned or not. I imagine there's a whole circle of hell devoted to maintaining COBOL apps.
"Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
This is a really interesting paper on the history and future of programming languages. (Check out the history chart in the middle....)
Suicide Booth: You are now dead! Thank you for using Stop and Drop, America's favorite since 2008.
no, you don't remeber your hist very well at all.
using round numbers, he is talking about the fifties, although really he probably wants to include the sixties.
So what did we have? Among others: Fortran, which is still around and has influenced many designs. Algol, which begat c, java, c++, c#. Lisp, which introduced FP and most (certainly not all) of the interesting ideas that somewhat mainstream languages like python, ruby, perl are starting to pick up on 30+ years later.
I know you weren't paying attention, but OO came in the 60's, and was developed *far* beyond anything seen today in mainstream production languages by the early 80's. (smalltalk, New Flavours, CLOS)
Most of what mainstream programmers think of as the history of language ideas is complete drek, because they make the mistake of thinking that the first time they see a company hyping an idea has any relationship to when the idea was arrived at.
If you had actually read the quoted sentenc fo comprehension, you would understand that he didn't say that Java would be dead, he said that it was an evolutionary dead end.
Not the same thing. Java is a fairly direct evolutionary descendant of Algol. Cobol, a contemporary of Algol, has no evolutionary descendants.
What he said is that the languages of 100 years from now will not *descend* from Java, any more than the languages of today descend from Cobol. I wouldn't be surprised if there were Java programs around in 100 years, but that is the nature of legacy systems, not an interesting insight.