Slashdot Mirror


"Super-DMCA" Outlaws Ph.D. Thesis

zenquest writes "SecurityFocus reports in this article that a recently-enacted Michigan law makes the graduate work of Niels Provos illegal. (His honeyd project was discussed here a few months back.) According to the article, "Among other things, residents of the Great Lakes State can no longer knowingly "assemble, develop, manufacture, possess, deliver, offer to deliver, or advertise" any device or software that conceals "the existence or place of origin or destination of any telecommunications service." It's also a crime to provide written instructions on creating such a device or program. Violators face up to four years in prison." Provos has had to move his website and research papers to a server in the Netherlands. Similar bills are under consideration in seven states, and have become law in six others. The EFF has more information about the individual states. So, does this mean that Caller-ID block now illegal, as well?"

20 of 556 comments (clear)

  1. Disgusting by ralico · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it now also illegal to drop an anonymous note into a suggestion box in Michigan?

    --

    SCO to Hell
  2. Bright Side by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot won't be getting any more AC posts from Michigan.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Bright Side by Pembers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Better yet, if this law really is as broad as claimed, most software for sending spam is now illegal in Michigan. It might even be illegal to operate an open relay, or to use one for spamming. Persuading law enforcement to go after a spammer on these grounds would be another matter altogether, I suppose.

  3. what about caller id blocking by dalesyk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone should inform the telcos that they cannot offer this service anymore. Then the army of telco lawyers will kill the bill.

  4. What worries me by kinnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... is that the US will use it's diplomatic muscle to force laws like this on those of us who live in the free world.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  5. Re:outrageous by Lobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will go as far as we allow the politicians to take it. Tell them what you think via snail mail or by phone, if that does not work tell them at the polls!

    --

    -------
    Bite Me Fanboy!!
  6. Dear Ted Turner, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Our group is putting together a hostile takeover bid for Haliburton, or even better, Bechtel. Could you please see your way to helping us out with a few million dollars?

    thx,
    The Comittee to Buy Back the Constitution

  7. Re:Where's this coming from? by jasonditz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Fear of technology that most of the congress doesn't understand

    2. Greater fear of those who know about that technology and therefore must be dangerous.

    3. Blind desire to control the actions of everybody else.

  8. Caller ID by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The law makes it illegal to hide the information from a service provider without the service provider's permission. In the case of caller ID, the service provider is the telephone company. You are not hiding the onformation from them, and even if you were, by using the service they provide, they are giving permission.

  9. Other legal documents by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I can legally post software that tells people how to create a bomb. Posting how to create a bomb on a web site has been to federal court and protected. But I can't write software to conceal a communications device? Which is more dangerous? And where does it end? Will anyone in the federal government be able to say code is a form of speech any time soon?

  10. Re:Quick Question... by shdowwar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thats how I read it.

    Yet another example of how politicians pass bills that they never expect to be enforced, just so that they can line their pockets with money. I really do hope that they realize that if this stupidity continues, not only will they be unable to move forward with technology, but they will squash educated thought and push us backwards!

    Just the stuff off the top of my head that would now be illegal...

    Cable/DSL routers for home use
    Private networks for business
    NAT and firewalling
    Proxy servers
    SSH and SSL tunnels
    Email Listservs set to strip off headers

    --
    -------- -Shdowwar And you thought that life was easy.
  11. Re: outrageous by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful


    > It will go as far as we allow the politicians to take it. Tell them what you think via snail mail or by phone, if that does not work tell them at the polls!

    Votes are anonymous; your plan is probably illegal in Michagan.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  12. Hitler and Stalin laughing in their graves by DailyGrind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Originally I was upset that Canada, where I live, did not follow the US, its close ally, into Iraq.

    This single post change all that.

    I believe that anonymity is the basis of a healthy democracy. It takes a lot of guts to stand up and say something controversial without being anonymous. I believe that the benefits of anonymous statements far out way the costs.

    The "...this is illegal because terrorists can use it..." argument is getting stale...

    There is a fine line between safety and police state and the US is passing it in a hurry.

    So hats of to living in Canada the home of the free.... until the US invades because we are thinking of legalizing possession of marihuana. As you know marihuana is a drug and drugs support terrorism.

    --
    You will have to pry my proprietary software $$$ from my cold dead hands!
  13. Re:outrageous by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Presidents don't pass laws, Congress does. All the President can do is use an (overrideable) veto, which they don't do very often, only on those issues which are truly fundamental to their platform. I think it's safe to say that nobody in Washington is informed well enough on this front to make it their central legislative focus, so the lobbyists get to define the details and steer the bill into law.

    However, this Michigan case doesn't really relate to the DMCA, does it? It sounds like it's targetting towards cable theft, but is written overly broadly and catches a huge array of legitimate activity within its net.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  14. Michigan ACs, beware! by mysticgoat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So does this also mean that slashdot has to

    • block everybody from Michigan, or
    • set up a filter so people from Michigan don't have the A.C. option, or
    • do away with Anonymous Coward?

    After all, the whole thing with AC is disguising the source of the post.

    Worrisome, this is.

    [note to moderators: Don't mod as "funny". This is truly serious tinfoil hat stuff. Think about it.]

  15. Re:outrageous by workindev · · Score: 5, Funny

    This makes sense. You don't like a law that a Democrat sponsored, a Democratic legislature voted for, and a Democratic president signed into law. Of course the obvious thing to do is blame the Republicans. Sounds reasonable.

  16. It's real simple... by sterno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Republican politicians - rich people
    Democratic politicians - guilty rich people

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  17. he's right by bogie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Republicans do a lot of talk about the need to dismantle the "bloated" Federal government but really they only want to dismantle some of it. They want to dismantle all of the social programs and consumer rights laws while at the same time building a permanent massive police state that invades every aspect of our lives.

    Even worse then the spying are the secret search warrants which bypass the judicial system.

    People are being held for anything, for any length of time, and without access to the outside all under the guise of "protecting the citizens(aka the state).

    Librarians are being hushed with threat of jail time and we have a Pres. who has made it clear how he feels about those who don't support his right to conquer anyone for any reason.

    This is all like some bad dream and the 1984 jokes aren't even funny anymore. I no longer laugh at those Rednecks hiding in the woods waiting for the government to come and seize their guns.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  18. Routers, etc. by joncarwash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All I can say to Michigan State police is have fun collecting every cable/dsl router (that usess NAT) in the state, including those at retail stores and warehouses. Oh, and hope you have enough room in jail for every person who owns one, the manager of the store where the bought it, the delivery boy who delivered it to the store, the truck driver who drove it into the state, and whoever decided to advertise the router in the state. And I am sure there are no routers that use NAT anywhere in any Michigan government office either... right...

    --
    A computer is a valuable tool, so use it and stop whining.
  19. Re:What if... by certron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    >IANAL, but shouldn't anybody ticketed by a hidden
    >radar speed trap be able to use this law to their
    >advantage? After all, if the police are disguising
    >"the existence or place of origin or destination of
    >any telecommunications service," they're in
    >violation of the law. Right?

    I hate to say this, but... "in violation of the law" ? They *are* the law!
    (yes, yes, oversight and fair trials, Constitutional rights, and why not, the Magna Carta...)

    I was just discussing this with someone else a few days ago, how sodomy laws still exist in a number of US states (most places say anything other than missionary style is technically illegal) and not only do the laws require an unreasonable invasion of privacy to enforce, but they are being enforced unevenly, being used to harass certain target people. These laws are just one more tool for the law enforcement establishment (the local police up to the FBI, and the judiciaries that paralell them) to make life difficult for 'undesirable' elements in society.

    Instead of mentioning how KMFDM's "What do you know, Deutschland?" is playing behind me, and the sample 'dogmatic police state' is in it, I'll just make reference to a quote that I can't remember, about how a state passes laws to make everyone a criminal, um, and how that is bad.

    --

    fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
    eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org