Slashdot Mirror


Sony & Toshiba Disclose Cell Fab Plans

sean23007 writes "InfoWorld is running an article about Sony and Toshiba's plans for new fabrication plants to build the 'Cell' chip jointly developed by Sony, Toshiba, and IBM for use in the Playstation 3 and other home entertainment uses. The new fabs will be located in Nagasaki and Oita, and both companies plan to spend $1.7 billion over the next 3-4 years in their construction. They will be capable of using 300 mm wafers with a 65 nm process. The chip is slated to be the first 1 teraflop consumer device."

28 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. But the Cel isn't going to be in the PS/3 by BancBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to IGN anyhow... To quote - Online news sites are reporting that the spring 2003 issue of Electronic Design Chain, an electronics trade magazine, features PlayStation creator Ken Kutaragi on the cover, and also contains very surprising news about the Playstation 3. According to the reports, Kutaragi mentions that final production of the "Cell" chip, originally thought to be used in the PlayStation 3, may not be ready until 2007. He also confirms that the CPU in the PlayStation 3 will in fact not be the Cell processor, contrary to earlier reports. With a targeted PlayStation 3 launch in 2005/2006, delayed production of the Cell processor may have caused Sony to find a different solution for their next-generation console.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  2. 2007 Then by Josuah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess this answers all of the speculative questions on when the PS3 will be able to come out. If Toshiba needs four years for its 65nm production lines, then 2007 is the earliest point that wafers could start coming off the line. So Christmas 2007? Looks like the PS2 still has a very long life ahead of it.

    1. Re:2007 Then by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i don't think microsoft will wait until 2007 to release Xbox2. Nor will nintendo wait that long to replace the gamecube. I would say that cell will not be in the PS3. More likely sony will put say 2 emotion chips in the same box and in a way double the processing power of the current PS2. this would be a good stop gap before the Cell processor is ready.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:2007 Then by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This would be one of the worst things Sony could imagine doing. The EE (emotion engine) is already massively parallel and a pain the butt to program for since you have to have so many things synced. Double that you are asking to kill off programmers as they try and work. The Gamecube and the Xbox have proven to developers that it can be easy to develop for a console as well as be powerful. The design behind the PS2 was bad bad bad...Sony had 2 generations on the top...the PS3 might be their N64....

  3. Too bad... by rkischuk · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Seen any BadMarketing lately?
  4. it looks like scea will lose their way by Luke+Skyewalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i expect that there will be lots of sony consumer electronics (dvd players, entertainment systems) embedded with ps3 technology. scea has been fighting to keep the ps series as a game console only, but MS is forcing them to integrate the ps3 with dvd/music/internet technology...

    conversely, sometimes i wonder if MS is striving to be the north american Sony (tablet pc, xbox, windows ce, keyboards, mice, etc...)

    1. Re:it looks like scea will lose their way by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always got the impression that Sony wanted to go the integrated home electronics route way before MS entered the game. I mean the original PS was always able to play music CD's if i recall correctly. Then PS2 was in developement before MS ever got in the video game business. So many of its capabilities have been in since the begining I am sure.

      Plus, Sony would love to be able to cheaply manufacture and sell at their usually high markups, one box that can be a PVR(whose abilities they would control), dvd/cd player, video game system, and maybe even throw in a Home theater capability. This seems to be both Sony and MS's ultimate goal, along with subscription services for games and other online activities.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:it looks like scea will lose their way by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      scea has been fighting to keep the ps series as a game console only, but MS is forcing them to integrate the ps3 with dvd/music/internet technology...

      More like the reverse. Sony always wanted to be a hub. MS saw that if this thing became a hub, the (relatively) cheap game console could become an alternative to a real PC, therefore an alternative to MS. Coudn't have that, came out with XBox.

  5. 32 MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With 1 Teraflop of processing power, I hope it'll come with more than 32MB RAM this time.

  6. Where's IBM in all this? by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why are only Sony and Toshiba reported? Does IBM not plan to produce and Cell chips or do they already have fab facilities?

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe IBM just plans on using their IT to help design the Cell, then they can make royalties off any Cell chips produced and sold by both Toshiba and Sony. I would think that is what IBM would like, saves their fab plants for other things.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 2, Troll

      Nintendo currently has a contract with IBM to fab the processor (a PPC derivative) for the "Dolphin", aka GameCube and other future consoles. While I'm not privy to the details (not my department), I imagine the contract has some anti-compete clause for some time.

      --
      -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    3. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by tigress · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Mr Gupta,

      I thought you worked at Sega?

      How's your Smell-o-vision (also here) project going?

      Your educational background is pretty impressive too.

      What about Super Marx Brothers?

      Finally, how's the Gameboy Advance Porn Industry going?

      Anyway, good luck at your job.

      (Thanks to Klaruz and cascino)

  7. Who said anything about phones??? by jayratch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but this conversation somehow went past me.

    Where in the article does any reference to wireless phones occur? And where in reality does a teraflop processor have its place in a phone?

    The real question here for us ignorami like myself is, how will this processor stack up against PC processors- and will it run Linux?

    Joking aside- and Beowulf clusters aside- this sounds like it could be a good idea for a versatile chip. If Toshiba's involved my guess is it will not be just for PS3, perhaps we'll now have another major plaer (or two) in the PC chip market? Hmm, Sony and Toshiba, leading laptop manufacturers, making their own chips. It's like Microsoft making keyboards and mice, I suppose, but perhaps better.

    Just my .02

  8. cost justification by ih8apple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to work for Intel in the Fab automation software department and I find it hard to believe they're can justify investing this much to start up new fabrication plants for an unproven product.

    Usually, with initial chip production at this scale, they lease out fab production time from other companies. Only huge production plans (like Pentiums or PowerPCs) generally justify building entire new Fabs. Plus, with the world economy slow, there's plenty of capacity at the world's fabs. Here's a good article on fab capacity

    1. Re:cost justification by sigep_ohio · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well with the number of PS2's that have sold so far worldwide, I guess Sony thinks the demand for Cell will be even bigger. I know Cell won't be in the PS3, but since it is a scalar architecture it can be placed in anything from cell phones to video game machines to computers. This makes the market for Cell even larger than that of a Pentium or PowerPC or The Emotion Engine in PS2.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:cost justification by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Atleast some part of the decision may be due to the culture of Sony
      Sony (the original one, not their music division) have always been about making a product and then finding a market for it. They pride themselves on being the lone-wolves and hence came up with a lot of products which are completely non-standard (unless the world accepted their standards)the oft used betaMax being a good candidate. Sony's memory products today are a good example, they are tiny but are not interchangeable with others (not all prodcuts, but there are examples like their USB cables etc.) .A completely new chip for a game machine seems to fit right in, compared to MicroSoft moving to Celerons.
      But then again they used to be able to come up with a product so good that they opened up whole new markets.
      This post is partially based on a reading of "Made in Japan" by Akio morita, and I understand that decisions of Billions are not always decided by the "culture" of a company.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    3. Re:cost justification by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Usually, with initial chip production at this scale, they lease out fab production time from other companies.

      True, but what fab has the capabilities to produce the 65nm parts that they require for the chip? AFAIK, there aren't any current fabs that could produce the chips they want (at least not in volume).

      --

      Enigma

    4. Re:cost justification by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very good point, also they probably have some deals they they are keeping their mouths shut about. When you are dealing with this kind of money I'm pretty sure they have a very good feeling about making a profit.

    5. Re:cost justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it hard to believe that you know anything about the economics of the semi-industry. Semicondutor manufacturers build a Fab to support a process, not a product. The need to expand the manufacturing capacity for a particular process might be predicated on the demand for a family of devices. That is not usually the case with Fabs designed for new processes. And not the case here. Just because the new processes will be needed for the viable production of the Cell chip, which potentialy will be a big money maker, does not mean that the plants will not be used for other devises. Farthermore, Japanese companies tend to take a lot longer view of things and are not put off by short term economic sluggishness. Unlike manufacturers in the US, who clench their collective A-holes at the slightest murmerings of uneducated Wallstreet analists. Fab capacity must be catagorized by the processes the Fabs support. After all one usualy does not use Dachshunds to pull dogsleds, or Pitbulls to herd sheep ( though the latter has been done). The Fab capacity for a new process is obviously going to be limited.

      BTW, 15+ years experience in Semiconducor Manufacturing in many different capacities including capacity managment.

  9. PS3 idea by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should just transcribe the Final Fantasy combat system into a hardware implementation. That's the only reason people buy these things anyway.

    I propose that the limit break be implemented by some sort of register overflow.

    They should do this in the Cell chips that are rumored, in the future, to be deployed in various home appliances. I, for one, would be impressed when my dryer finishes the tumble cycle and then performs a super-attack on the toaster.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:PS3 idea by photon317 · · Score: 3, Funny


      Hey! I bought mine for Gran Turismo. I'd rather see a dedicated hardware implementation of that (oh wait, I already have one of those in my garage...).

      --
      11*43+456^2
  10. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Dajur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell are you talking about. Even if they "open sourced" the processor, how many open source developers do you know that have access to a 65nm Fab to play around with it.

  11. Who knew? by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    That the move to 65nm fabrication would be due to the machine that'll be running a to-be-released version of Grand Theft Auto and not some military system or huge scientific cluster ;-)

    -psy

  12. Re:Wowza by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, I should clarify, not just cell phones, but all electronics should have better methods of recycling them. When you went out to buy that PS2, what happened with the PS died? Circuit boards have many elements that should not be in a standard landfill.

  13. makes perfect sense... by sterno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if this chip's architecture turns out to be a dud, they'll have plants ready to produce 65 nanometer processors. Eventually they'll have some chips running at 65 nanometers, and they'll have a fab ready to produce it. Worst case scenario is that they can sell their fab capabilities to other companies that want to run at 65 nanometers. The odds that these plants won't have a long run value seems pretty small to me.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  14. more detailed story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    http://www.designchain.com/coverstory.asp?issue= sp ring03

  15. That beats Intels 90nm fab out of the water by mnmn · · Score: 3, Interesting


    And so does including memory and GPU with the CPU. You could imagine the desktop computer market for these babies.... if released with Linux.

    Thinking of that, I wonder if they would allow hookup to a DVI connector, or replacing the BIOS, or adding PCI/ISA slots, or even producing whole chips for third party taiwanese boards that would then be built into workstations. If the chip is up to the spec, on time and reasonably priced, theres already a big Linux-based market for it, meself included. Saddams gotta steal only a FEW of these to build nukes. Wonder if an anarchist teen could do that with this christmas present.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky