Slashdot Mirror


New Trailer for The Hulk

Andorion writes "How many comics will make it to the big screen, how many will be as good as Spiderman or X-Men, and how many will be as bad as Daredevil? Who knows, but the new trailer for The Hulk was just released, and it looks pretty sweet!"

11 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Download URL by Zoid · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    /// Zoid.
  2. New Trailer for The Hulk? by GMontag · · Score: 5, Funny

    What happened to his old trailer? Was it just a plain aluminum job like the kind old people tow to Florida?

    I hope his trailer is made of something really strong, like adamantium(sp?) as in Wolverines bones. Stainless just does not stand up to the nasty temper of the Hulk!

  3. Another misuse of CGI by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some of those hulk shots look plain phony. CGI models look great and all, but the motion is always too fluid, too phony.

    A big muscleman with green greasepaint would move much more convincingly, Lou Ferigno (sp?) made a more convincing Hulk than an animated model. Roll Big Poppa Pump around in some grass clippings and have him hulk around.

    Sometimes the most simple and conventional SFX are the most convincing on screen. CGI is great for aliens and monsters and stuff like that, but there are too many subtleties with human movement that we're all subconciously accustomed to.

    Plus, the "making of" documentaries are now just filming a couple nerds sitting in front of a 22 inch monitor looking at wire models.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Another misuse of CGI by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah, the new age of CGI. Remember Jurassic Park? Terminator 2?
      Back when CGI was used to create things that didn't exist, or create spectacular scenes and special effects that'd be near impossible to make with conventional films. For a while now however, CGI is simply the cheaper alternative. It's easier, faster and cheaper to blow up something in a computer than to actually rig explosives, if it looks real is irrelevant. It is a step back to the corny special effects of previous decades where the audience is asked to not look to closely at the screen. When CGI is used to create scenes that are hard to do in reality it is a Good Thing, when it's used to keep the budget down it usually tends to suck badly.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  4. Re:Trailer trash by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Considering the Hulk's anger-management problem, is it really wise to put him up in another trailer?

    Maybe in the sequel, the Hulk will be ordered by the courts to have Jack Nicholson move in with him to help control his anger.

    At least THAT would be a far more interesting anger management movie than the dreck the Adam Sandler is currently in.

  5. Hope they include classic Hulk theme by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doc Bruce Banner,
    Belted by gamma rays,
    Turned into the Hulk.
    Ain't he unglamo-rays!
    Wreckin' the town
    With the power of a bull,
    Ain't no monster clown
    Who is that lovable?
    It's ever lovin' Hulk! HULK!! HULK!!"

    Maybe Smashmouth could do it.

    --
    "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
  6. Re:Don't make me angry... by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 5, Funny

    You wouldn't like me when I'm Ang Lee...

  7. Re:More from the TV show? by SealBeater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the comics he's Bruce, in the TV show he's David. Not sure
    why.


    Stan Lee liked names with both initials the same, Richard Reed, Bruce Banner,
    Peter Parker, etc. It helped him remember what the names were. The producers
    of the TV show changed it to David, because at the time, they felt "Bruce"
    would stir up homosexual connotations. In other words, they thought "Bruce"
    was gay and "David" was more manly. Side note, considering that "David" is the
    name of the naked statue that Michaelangelo sculpted, I'm not quite sure what
    they were thinking.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  8. Re:lets hope... by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't make me Ang Lee.

    You wouldn't like me when I'm Ang Lee.

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

  9. The Fatal Flaw makes the Hero by PMuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Marvel pantheon is full of deep, fascinating characters (as well as some real stinkers). The best of the Marvel heroes revolve around some fundamental question of humanity or some basic emotion. For instance:

    Spiderman = Responsibility. Stan Lee's quip, "With great power comes great responsibility" may not be as catchy as "Up, Up and Away" or "To the Batmobile, Robin", but it's a lot more inspiring when you think about it. Pete Parker received a talent by random chance, an accident, something that he had no say about. That talent has been both blessing and curse to him. That talent is what makes the stories fun to read. What Pete does with that talent is what makes them meaningful.

    Hulk = Rage. Bruce David Banner is a civilized, intelligent man. The raging child inside him is anything but. The writers of this book have spent years dousing for the sources of the ever-flowing font of rage that wells up within Banner's fractured soul. His father, his mother, his wife, his father-in-law, his employers. About the only thing they haven't thrown at poor Bruce, as far as I can recall, is children. It doesn't hurt the story any that it was the work of Bruce's own intellect (the gamma experiment) that set the monster within him loose. Now, every day that Bruce wakes up amid the wreckage of some unfamiliar place, he must ask "My God, what have I done?" of his actions taken both while monster and as a man.

    Iron Man = Weakness. Bright and shiny on the outside, a lifestyle of flash and sparkle. But, within, there are flaws. Billionaire playboy inventor Tony Stark has a weak heart, is an alcoholic, and has no lasting relationships. Is his entire life a hollow shell? In addition, Iron Man must also deal with the constant possibilities that the handiwork of his mind, which is also the foundation of his fortune, can be so easily turned to evil by others. Iron Man, and to some extent the Hulk as well, must address the problem presented over and over in Tolkien's works: the creations of our intellects can turn against us to work great evil because all machines, once created, have no governing wisdom of their own. Bruce Banner's science opened Pandora's Box and found the Hulk inside. Tony Stark tried to create a better world through technology and learned that technology is equally powerful as a tool of evil.

    Captain America = Idealism. Steve Rogers is a man of high ideals faced with a world filled with awful circumstances. Sure, he can try to fight the bad guy, but he's only human and he often fails. What's harder to fight are the situations where the country he loves hasn't lived those ideals.

    X-Men = Alienation. While individual X-men have very individual stories, the series overall explores the question of conflict between diverse groups. The homo sapiens v. homo superior conflict serves as a metaphor not only for race relations, but for relationships between parents and children as well. Each mutant must deal with the feelings of isolation and loneliness they experience while acting out their personal mythology: "nothing like this has ever happened to anyone buy me."

    Green Lantern (and Dare Devil) = Fear. Courage is an act that only those who feel fear can perform. I'm not sure that either of these characters lives up to their billing as being "without fear", but they both show that it's possible to act in situations that would scare the living @&%! out of any rational person.

    To sum it up, every great hero needs a fatal flaw. The flaw is how the reader relates. The flaw is how the tale teaches. Stories in comics are just as full of flash and bang as any other mythic tale, but they can also be as full of substance.

    'Nuff said.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  10. Re:Physics?!? by John+Carmack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To leap 50' in the air, you must be going 56.6 ft/s when leaving the ground, disregarding air resistance. Apogee will be in 1.77 seconds.

    Assuming a linear acceleration, and a four foot period of acceleration from crouching to leaving the ground with legs extended, the average speed must be 28.3 ft/s over the four feet, for 0.14 seconds of acceleration, or 404 ft/s^2. 12.6 G's of acceleration isn't at all unreasonable for arm / leg contraction at light loads. You can make a >50G acceleration with a pitching motion of your arm.

    12.6 G's of acceleration for an 800 pound hulk is only 10080 pounds, divided by two 24" long by 8" wide feet give a mere 26.25 psi force on the pavement.

    If I botched these calculations, everyone is surely going to take the opportunity to say how the Armadillo vehicles will crash and burn... :-)

    John Carmack