OpenBSD 3.1 End Of Life
Dan writes "OpenBSD team's Miod Vallat says that due to the upcoming release of OpenBSD 3.3, the 3.1-STABLE branch will have no more fixes committed to its branch after June 1, 2003 and should therefore be considered out of regular maintenance."
Is that OpenBSD 3.1 is DEAD! But it will be resurrected as 3.3.
I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
I thought its the EOL for OpenBSD.
And I was just gettin interested with all the OpenBSD stories in slashdot these days.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
How dare they stop supporting an old version like that? What's their problem? Who do they think they are, MICROSOFT?!?!???!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!
"Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
-Marilyn Manson
Oh, just mod me down and get it over with. :-)
$ uname -a
OpenBSD yellow 3.0 GENERIC#94 i386
Hmm. That's not a good sign.
Does anyone know if there's an easy way to update a box to a new version of OpenBSD without having to reinstall everything? Something like the "make world" from FreeBSD would be great.
--saint
Netcraft now confirms
BSD holds 24 of the 25 longest uptime records. The top two servers have been up four and a half years without a reboot.
Fact: BSD does it longer!
Get the facts straight.
I won't believe you until Netcraft confirms it!!
Well...ok...so Netcraft proves that BSD is still dying but very slowly!
Ok ok, so I'm just Trolling, Ed
Who is this "Poster" guy and why does he own all of my comments?!?
Look, does slashdot also post articles about how redhat 5.1 is "dead". Fuckers.
actually redhat announced that it is EOLing all versions one year after the intro of the next version, even for those of us that pay for support for our current 7.2- systems. We have talked about this in several areas, although I don't see a particular article posted on it.
But it has been talked about a fair amount.
Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!