Slashdot Mirror


EFF's Cindy Cohn Talks About Patriot Act II

digidave writes "Techfocus.org has an interview with EFF's Legal Director Cindy Cohn, where she talks about the Domestic Security Enhancement Act, or 'Patriot Act II'. She talks about what the act is, how it might infringe on your freedoms, where it does right and how ordinary people can make a difference."

22 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Singapore by (X)Paul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One day we are going to wake up, and wish we were living in Singapore. Slowly we are losing all of the freedoms and rights that make great innovations possible. The Dark Ages are coming ... great thinkers and great innovators cannot function in a society of fear.

  2. With Bush in power, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bush, the closest thing to fascist we've ever had.

    Just remember what it was like 3 years ago: Economy was good, we had jobs, the President was brokering peace between Israel and Palestine, and our biggest worry was that the President had consentual sex with his adult intern. Oh my.

    Today: Economy is crashing, > 6% unemployment
    rate is common in urban areas across the country, we're in a questionable and bloody war for oil, the same people who bolstered Saddam into power are in control today, Israel and Palestine aren't even on the map, the Bush administration is silencing political critics, and the government wants to investigate your private life to make sure you are not a terrorist, headed by Big Brother himself.

    So much has been lost in just 3 years.

    1. Re:With Bush in power, what do you expect? by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not to troll or be annoying here... but I think this is a little far fetched:

      " Bush, the closest thing to fascist we've ever had."

      If Bush was a "fascist," then you wouldn't have just posted that comment and would be jailed or killed. You still have the right to say that Bush is a fascist or whatever, don't get me wrong. But don't go throwing around terms that don't apply in the situation.

      --
      take off every sig for great justice
    2. Re:With Bush in power, what do you expect? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Bush was a "fascist," then you wouldn't have just posted that comment and would be jailed or killed.

      To quote Ari Fleischer, "People ought to watch what they say."

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:With Bush in power, what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excuse me but while I dont approve of Bush, Clinton was responsible of allowing the 9-11 feelings to build up.

      Shrub Jr's administration wasnt the one who was catering to Bin Laden when he was in Bosnia serving US interest. Tne Clinton administration was the one that helped prop up (as well as extend the conflict by refusing 4 peace plans) a 'moderate' muslim, one who only a few years before wrote in his book that islam cannot cohabit with any other religion or social structure and how it must be predominant.
      It was the one that also allowed an admitted holocaust denier to receive special favours.
      (in his book Historical Wastelands, croatian general Tudjman claims that the numbers for the jewish deaths in WW2 was greatly exxagerated and that in the infamous camps in Croatia, which even the SS found revolting, the jews used to abuse and rob their own people and so on. The jewish american lobby might as well have shit on their ancestors for allowing this. Hell, everyone knew about Waldheim too but thats another story.)
      The single biggest piece of ethnic cleansing in that region was carried out with close collbaoration with american forces.

      And let's forget that Hamas, Al Quaeda were pocket change in 1999 when the US supported what the CIA had called the previous year 'the largest and best trained terrorist group in the world'.

      True, daddy Bush had his hands deep in the crapper but Blowjob Bill just kept the same course.

      Hell, Im surprised that a dinosaur like Madeleine Halfbright didnt actually stay from the Clinton regime.

      v.

      I love how americans seem to believe that there is fundamental differences between the two parties.

    4. Re:With Bush in power, what do you expect? by ultraslacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The quote was 'closest thing to fascist we've ever had.' That's accurate, although I wouldn't say Bush but rather the Bush administration.

      Hell yeah this is the closest thing to fascism I've seen in the states. We've got the bellicose nationalism, we've got the centralization of authority, we've got the propaganda, and you better damn better believe we've got erosion of privacy and individual rights. What else do you need? The crude oppression? Don't worry, white bread americans don't have to see that, as that's just for the 'others' - the Iraqis at the moment.

  3. questions by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who will monitor the monitors?
    Who will liberate the liberators?

  4. And where is the patriotism? by yintercept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Patriotism is an act that people take in loyalty to their government. For example, joining the National Guard is a patriotic act. Dictionary.com gives the definition for patriotism as:

    Love of and devotion to one's country.

    Patriotism is an attitude of the individual to the country. Patriotism does not come from the government to the people.

    The fact that some many things are coming out of the current administration with the label "patriot" is extremely disconcerting. The consistent redefinition of terms is the hallmark of dictatorship.

    Regardless of the merits of the act, the fact that it is mislabeled is cause for concern.

    The same is true with the mislabeling of 9/11 as "Patriot Day". The day had nothing to do with American patriotism. The people who died in the terrorist bombing were not acting patriotically. They were being acted on.

    Just looking at the definition...the closest thing we have to patriotism on 9/11 is that the fanatics who took over the airplanes held the belief that they were killing Americans for their country and for Islam. Ignoring our own feelings and looking at the words we see that the terrorists killing Americans is closer to the true definition of the word "patriot" than the non action of the victims.

    Misusing terms is always a grave cause for concern.

    I am not dissing true patriotism. We owe our freedom to people who took the patriotic step to defend freedom. In fact, I would say the misusing of the term is an affront to the true patriot. It dillutes the sacrafices made by American patriots.

    1. Re:And where is the patriotism? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would-be totalitarian regimes pretty much always redefine "patriotism" as "doing whatever the government tells you to do and singing its praises" -- and its opposite, "treason," as "voicing any opinion contrary to the will of the government." Thus we have the USA-PATRIOT Act, and Fox News (AKA the US Government Ministry of Information) labeling protestors "traitors." This is the first step; the next n-2 steps are to be found in any book on the history of Germany, Russia, or China. Step n involves lots of barbed wire and mass graves.

      No, we're not there yet, or I wouldn't be able to say what I'm saying. But in not so many years, we could be, and anyone who thinks I'm overreacting is desperately naive.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:And where is the patriotism? by Temsi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. It's sickening to hear government officials calling people traitors and unpatriotic for speaking out in dissent. Labeling those who disagree with the government's policies as unpatriotic and treasonous is in itself extremely unpatriotic and moreover, it's profoundly un-American.
      Since this country is a democratic republic, the voice of the people must be heard. That means ALL people, not just those who agree with whatever administration happens to be in power. Expressing ones dissent is not only the most patriotic thing you can do, it is the most American thing you can do. Democracy without dissent, is not a Democracy.

      These "patriot acts" are fundamentally un-American, and their proponents should be removed from office.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  5. Re:Haha "Patriot" Act ( the cynic in me speaking) by bj8rn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "It only takes a single grain of sand to move the world" - Mao Zedong

    I can't help but begin this post with a cynical remark (sorry, but I've had a bad week...) You don't need masses for a job that one man can do... Lee Harvey Oswald thought he was a patriot, too. And the man who murdered Pim Fortyn (a right-wing populist politician from Netherlands; I don't support that kind of politicians, by the way) said he did it for the sake of the country...

    Now, what I really wanted to say was, that Josef Goebbels would be proud of the Bush administration's rhetorics. I mean, calling a law that just invites people to be unpatriotic "The Patriot Act"... Another thing that's just impressive was how in the news today, someone from the Pentagon or US government talked about how the Iraqis may have destroyed all their weapons of mass destruction before the war had begun, and he made it sound as if it had been something unspeakable and unheard of ("how dare they?" was the message)...

    Please think about it a bit before modding me down. Then my karma at least served some purpose.

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  6. We're Americans: Let's Stand up for our Freedoms by reporter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Patriot Act is one of those pieces of legislation which tests the mettle of being an American or, in general, a Westerner. What makes us different from non-Westerners like the Chinese is that when our basic freedoms are violated, we protest. We support the ACLU. We support Amnesty International. In short, we support basic human rights and civil liberties.

    What will become of the USA if we allow the Patriot Act to continue suppressing our freedoms? Think "China" or "Chinese society". The Chinese in Singapore regularly ban "The Economist", a reputable journal. The Chinese will throw you into prison for holding a peaceful demonstration against the government.

    Note that the Patriot Act curtails the Freedom of Information Act. What happens when government prevents its own citizens from knowing the activities of the government? Think "Chinese government". The Chinese in Beijing covered up the lethal illness called "Sudden Accute Respiratory Syndrome", and this coverup engendered the proliferation of the SARS epidemic to all corners of the globe. Read "China and SARS". Indeed, the majority of Chinese believe that "maintaining social order [is] more important than democracy". This "maintaining social order" means "restricting freedom of speech, press, and assembly". Read "Poll: Hong Kong residents optimistic".

    Both Singapore and the USA are modern societies in terms of technology. Yet, most people prefer to live in the USA, not Singapore, because of the openness and freedom in American society. What distinguishes us Americans from the Chinese is our willingness to support freedom of thought and speech and to support openness in our own government. Otherwise, the USA will degenerate into a nation like Singapore or, worse, China.

  7. Freedom? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Do you know what fascism is?

    ...The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone....

    Read more here.

    If you live in the US, please think about how your government tramples on every idea of freedom, peace and democracy and then adds insult to injury by trying to convince you that, indeed you enjoy the freedom to say and do whatever you want.

    A democratic regime would never have its president utter the words "with us or against us".

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  8. The US has lost sight of its ideals... by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As someone born in India, educated in the US, and now working in Japan, I have extremely mixed views of the US. As someone who spent years in America as a student and a researcher, I am truly thankful for the opportunity that I had to be a part of the world's leader in science and technology, an environment that welcomes the world's best and contribute what I could to its intellectual and economic prowess.

    Now, 20 years later, I probably would not have done the same were I in those shoes again. Such acts like the Patriot Act, detainings of people -- many times US Citizens themselves -- on the basis of race, under no basis for charge, new onerous immigration restrictions that make even getting a tourist visa about as easy as winning the lottery if one is unlucky enough to be from a country that's not western European, and other such hypocritical erosions of the consitution have turned me off.

    Japan is not perfect, mind you. Its people still have a air of racial superiority about them left from their imperialist warmongering days, and discrimination in employment and all aspects of society is too often blatant for me and other people with too dark of a skin color. But even they don't think of us as criminals without a cause, which is what the US is doing. And I feel free to go about my work without fear that the police may be scrutinizing my every move, trying to "prove" my association with terrorist groups.

    In short, I fear that Bush and Rumsfeld have done irreparable damage to the United States' image as a bastion of democracy and freedom in the world. Prior to the crackdowns on people in the US under the veil of 9/11, the erosion of the Consitution, and the invasion of Iraq, the United States held both the military power and the moral authority to enforce its opinions, a right it earned through decades of generally magnanimous acts in support of these causes around the world. Today, all this work has been laid to waste because of the shortsighted policies of George Bush and his advisors. The world views the United States, rightly so in my opinion, as hypocrites. It will take a long time (and most likely a new administration) to change that view for the better.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:The US has lost sight of its ideals... by praksys · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But even they don't think of us as criminals without a cause, which is what the US is doing.

      Do you think this would still be true if the 9/11 attacks had happened in Tokyo instead of New York and Washington? The US was never as perfect as you remember, nor as admired or respected, and now it is not as bad as you suppose.

      People forget that the rest of the world said exactly the same sort of thing about Reagan (and worse) that people are now saying about Bush. They said he was an idiot, and a warmonger, and plenty of other things besides - until after communism was defeated.

      People forget that although the constitution is now more than two hundred years old, most of the constitional rights that are now under threat are no more than a few decades old (being the results of relatively recent Supreme Court rulings).

      People also forget that the US is in fact facing a deadly threat, and that there is no garantee that it will survive this war against terrorism.

      I think that is probably one of the most serious problems with this war. With terrorism there are no massing armies on the border, and no enemies that bang their shoes on podiums in the UN and promise to burry us. It is all too easy to forget that the threat is there. But we have three thousand dead American civillians to remind us - more than in any war since the Civil War - and if terrorism becomes nuclear then those thousands will become millions. The US government has realised that there is no way to defend against nuclear terrorism, except to stamp out terrorism before it gets that far. If they fail in this task then the US will cease to exist along with most of what we now call civilisation.

      In the face of such a threat desperate measures are required, and the tuth is that even if Ashcroft got every power he is asking for, US civil rights would still be in better shape than they were in the 1960's or even in the 1970's.

      How this administration is judged in the long term will depend entirely on the results they achieve. If they democratize the middle east, as they claim they intend to, then the reputation of the US will not suffer any harm. In the meantime the US should expect no more respect or admiration from the rest of the world than it got during the cold war - i.e. none at all.

    2. Re:The US has lost sight of its ideals... by smugfunt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People also forget that the US is in fact facing a deadly threat, and that there is no garantee that it will survive this war against terrorism.

      They don't forget, they just don't believe it. However, I think you may be correct. The current administration represents the greatest genuine threat America has ever had to face.
    3. Re:The US has lost sight of its ideals... by praksys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't forget, they just don't believe it.

      I think that is right. For years - a decade or more - there were a bunch of anti-terrorism types (like these ones) warning about the possibility of terrorist attacks on a huge scale. No one really took the threat seriously - and that was understandable - because such attacks had never actually happened. Now they have happened.

      For years the same guys have been warning about the possbility of nuclear terrorism. We know for a fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and they are one small revolution away from being run by terrorists. We know that North Korea has nuclear weapons, and they are already run by terrorists. And those are just the cases where we have no doubt. There are a number of other countries where nuclear weapons programs probably exist. Even worse we can predict with near certainty, thanks to the march of scientific progress, that nuclear weapons will continue to become cheaper and easier to acquire.

      So do you think that we should all wait until after a few million people are killed before acting this time?

  9. BINGO by jabber01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which is exactly why the Second Amendment is critical. It allows We The People to enforce the First Amendment, and the rest as well.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

    1. Re:BINGO by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      defeatist attitude? hardly, just said small arms not sufficient given technology a first world government can muster (whether their technology level could stay high is another question). Effective "fighting" might not involve weapons at all

  10. Book Recommendation by Pettifogger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you're as outraged by "Patriot II" as most people here seem to be, go get a copy of "It Can't Happen Here," by Sinclair Lewis. Though written in 1935, it draws some spooky parallels to what's going on right now.

    If there's no regime change in November 2004, I'm going to put my plans in action for leaving the country. There are better places to live, and if you're young enough and skilled/educated, you can jump through their immigration hoops and get a passport. You know, like what a whole lot of Germans did in the 30s.

    --

    IAAL

    1. Re:Book Recommendation by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there's no regime change in November 2004, I'm going to put my plans in action for leaving the country.

      Not me, I love my country, and I'm gonna stay here and take it back. You can run away if you want, but I'm gonna stay here and fight.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  11. Re:Taking a stand (Different) by anonicon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not flaming you, but I do have a suggestion or two.

    First, voting is the *last* thing (literally) you should do to make changes in your political leadership. Voting is the final judgement, but getting involved in the political process is the first thing we should be doing.

    I'm not talking about protests or sit-ins or organized campaigns. I'm talking about getting personally involved the EASY way. Call your state, Congressional and Senate reps and make an appointment to talk about 1 issue (this isn't an all-you-can-eat buffet) with the Rep's staffer. Follow up with a brief thank you note and a reminder of what was discussed. Follow up every two weeks with a phone call, and follow up with scheduled meetings as you feel is needed. Rinse and repeat, make it a habit like checking your e-mail.

    This isn't rocket science. The methods, tools and customs of political involvement are really old. If you have the intelligence to filter Slashdot comments, you're smart enough to make a political difference.

    The only variable here is your commitment to follow through. The EFF can't do it alone.

    Peace,
    Chuck