Slashdot Mirror


A New Meaning For Geotargeting At Monster.com

Duke submits a link to this New York Times story, according to which "it seems that Monster.com has taken the U.S. government's policy of sanctions against certain countries and run with it where no man has gone before. Monster 'has deleted resumes that list current addresses in those countries.' and more fun stuff. If you haven't had the opportunity for a really self-rightous post in a while, Monster.com has made it simple for you." Update: 04/28 01:34 GMT by T : Note that the New York Times ran the story, but like many other newspaper stories, the real credit goes to the Associated Press.

3 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The American Way by Jhon · · Score: 0, Redundant
    As an American, I say "what fucking business is it of ours?" Not a single one of the so-called 'threats to national security' is any threat at all, if we just mind our own goddamned business and stop trying to impose a 'Pax Americana' on the rest of the world.
    I wish I lived in a world as simple as yours. I truly do.

    However, as an American, I agree with you. America as an empire a bad idea. But America does have and will look out for it's interests -- so long as the American people want us to. Just as every other country looks out for it's interests. Why should the US be different?
  2. Proofreading? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The change has angered some Monster users, who say the policy censors and discriminates against people including immigrants wotj ties to some of the countries in question or businesses seeking to recruit there.

    It's good to see that even the Times can't run as much as a spell check anymore.

  3. Violation of U.S. Federal Law by hamhocks · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Even the Bush Administration, and Monster.com, are not above the law.

    Civil Rights Act of 1964:

    SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]


    (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -

    (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his
    compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

    (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

    (b) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.