Slashdot Mirror


Reading Lips In Software

SEWilco writes "The Register points out that Intel has released code for reading lips from a video image, Audio Visual Speech Recognition (AVSR). They do point out that better results would probably be achieved by combining video and audio recognition processing. I don't know if they have any patents, we all know some prior "art" from 2001, er.. 1968. HAL's accomplishment was also mentioned by CNN during 2001 in an article about this group's work."

7 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. So computers can now talk to themselves (Re /.) by skermit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A couple months ago, a very fine article was posted to /. about work at MIT regarding speech-->video synthesis using pre-recorded syllables. This means in the near future we'll be able to have avatars which an communicate to other people by videophone and/or other computers should we wish to do so. I'm reposting the old link because it got /.'ed for about 2 months (the professor took down the link) before putting the vids back up. So check out the amazing work that's on the flip-side of this article.

    http://cerboli.mit.edu:8000/research/mary101/resul ts/results.html

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  2. Not that 2001 ended up being very accurate... by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... but I think it is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke thought HAL reading lips was the only implausible scene in the film. You know, as opposed to the whole aliens thing. :P Just goes to show you the perils of trying to predict the future...

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  3. Sigh... by ScoLgo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sigh... the signal to noise ratio alone is enough to lend you reasonable anonymity. There's just way too much information that would need to be grepped through in order to listen in on your dinner conversation. No one, (or their Big Brother), is going to bother unless they have a really good reason to be investigating you in the first place.

    I'm thinking that the 'good' will outweigh the 'evil' here...

    --
    "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    1. Re:Sigh... by shaitand · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about having it record everything it picks up and time coding it, so that you grep for the word "revolution" "bomb" "nuts itch"and then cross reference it to the time sequence in the video. This is then passed on to the FBI as routine policy for "the war on terror"

  4. Re:Copyrighted Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Just in case anyone gets the wrong idea here, copyrighted works cannot be used to contravene a patent.

    erm, yes they can. In fact, the firm I work for specializes in that very thing.

  5. Re:Prior Art? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Did Clarke ever file a patent for the geosynchronous satellites?

    No, he never did. If he had, he would almost certainly by now be far and away the richest man on the planet. Now, imagine if you will what Arthur Clarke might have done with a fortune that would make Gates green with envy... He'd have been on Mars twenty years ago.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  6. Actually, this could be a major breakthrough by RhettLivingston · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in speech recognition if it does no more than allow input from a camera to aid in separating out which sounds came from which speakers. Simply fixing the background noise problem would be a huge advance.