Slashdot Mirror


Review of SuSE 8.2

technoid_ writes "The Register has a glowing review of Suse 8.2. Wow, the Register can actually be nice?"

4 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. NVidia and SAMBA by BrynM · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    I opted for the RPM because nVidia warns of dire consequences with SaX2 configuration otherwise.
    Oddly enough, I did just the opposite by using SuSE's "update" feature and it worked flawlessly (even for my TNT2 M64 which is notorious for problems). This is a huge improvement from 7.x, under which I could never get an NVidia card to work right.

    SuSE (and other distros) sadly lack an easy way to share a directory under SAMBA. There are a few utilities to browse windows shares and mount them, but nothing to create a share with a GUI. I can't believe I've been mucking around with samba.conf since 5.X! Having it built into Konqueror would be great, but I dream. Has anyone found GUI tools for SAMBA that work well?

    By the way, SuSE can't use the SMB Python library, so the killer SAMBA Python GUI isn't possible under SuSE. Such a bummer, because there already is a great tool written under Python. I don't remember the name off the top of my head though.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  2. More reviews by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In OSNews there is also a good review of SuSE 8.2 for a desktop user, comparing it with Redhat 9.

    In the other hand, in Linux and Main they have a mostly negative review.

    But, at least for me, it installed without problems in the systems I tried, and it looks more mature than 8.1, is not just a package versions upgrade.

  3. Linux Newbie by Infernon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a linux newbie. I've been using Windows for years. That being said...
    I went out and picked up SuSE 8.2 last week and installed it under VMWare and I love it (despite the fact that I can't get VMWare tools to install!). I think that KDE 3.1 kicks the living snot out of Windows, period. I would even propose that my mother could use it without a problem.
    As the article said, the installation was flawless and it picked up the virtual NIC automatically. I didn't encounter one problem (except as noted above) and I found that I started running the VM fullscreen despite the low resolution because I just enjoyed working with it.
    I'm not ready to get involved on a command-line level as of yet and probably won't until I finish my MCSE (please don't flame me!), but it's definitely a tight package compared to other Linux installs that I've played with before.
    Sadly, Linux doesn't seem to have much support for games and it's really the only reason that I haven't dumped Windows from my main machine and taken the plunge. I know that everyone talks a good deal about WINE, but I've heard that there are problems with it.
    Oh well, just my two cents...

  4. Re:OK, so maybe I'll give this "Linux" thing a try by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Well, the install takes about a half hour. Maybe more, maybe less, depends on your hardware. This will install the OS, OpenOffice.org's office suite, multimedia stuff, etc. If you want a DVD player, thanks to our friend the DMCA, you'll have to go grab some rpm's and install them, about 5 minutes of your time.

    Installing a copy of Tribes 2 or UT2003 will take a few minutes. There are other games. Does that answer the gaming question?

    Of course, you'll want to install other stuff, and whatnot. Roughly setting up, timewise, is going to be a little less than setting up with windows. //Rant
    Now, as a developer, who's done both Win and *nix development, you couldn't really find any way to put a nice spin on Windows development. And, by development, I'm not talking about writing some cute little VB database front ends.

    I'm talking about writing backend stuff. Data handling stuff. Servers. Things where windows just doesn't do well. Need to share objects? COM? Who came up with that horrible idea. regsvr32? WTF is up with that? //End Rant