Slashdot Mirror


Enterprise Getting New Aliens, Hairdos, Weapons

Steve Krutzler writes "The news about Enterprise's radical "new direction" for its third season is going mainstream on May 10th in TV Guide. Rick Berman reveals that the season finale will bring about major changes in the struggling Star Trek series for next year including new aliens, new weapons, new hairdos and a mission he calls a Star Trek "first."" I've felt like the show has been slipping all season, so here's hoping.

50 of 602 comments (clear)

  1. Borg by dsyu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just somehow bring the Borg into an episode. That'll sell it. Oh wait, they're already doing that....

    1. Re:Borg by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Just somehow bring the Borg into an episode. That'll sell it. Oh wait, they're already doing that.... "

      Even if this ep bombs, there's still some potential here. (Note: I'll never forgive Voyager for pussifying the Borg.)

      What this episode proves (assuming a rumor I read is true...) is that Enterprise takes place after the Enterprise-E visited Earth in First Contact. There are a few ramifications here. This closes up most of the continuity holes that people keep bitching about, which means that Enterprise isn't locked any particular chain of events. Earth could go into a bloody war with the Vulcans.

      The potential here is that the future of the Federation could be rewritten. Anybody remember "Yesterday's Enterprise" where the Enterprise-C jumped into the future and altered the timeline?

      Even more interesting, what if we're watching the chain of events that caused the Federation to behave more like an Empire in the paralell universe that Kirk found himself in due to a transporter accident?

      In any case, it's up to to the B&B team to actually make good use of this. I'm not ready to bet money yet. I can say, though, that last night's episode had a rather startling ending. If that's a sign of things to come, then we might start to see DS9's style of drama percolating up to Enterprise. That'd be a welcome evolution for this series. It is a little on the sterile side.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Borg by hpa · · Score: 4, Informative
      What this episode proves (assuming a rumor I read is true...) is that Enterprise takes place after the Enterprise-E visited Earth in First Contact.

      Given the fact that First Contact introduced the first Earth warp ship, bar none, wouldn't you say that's pretty well established already?

    3. Re:Borg by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Given the fact that First Contact introduced the first Earth warp ship, bar none, wouldn't you say that's pretty well established already? "

      No. That ship happened before the Enterprise went back in time. The reason that the Enterprise-E was involved with repairing (not building) that ship was because the Borg Sphere attacked it.

      B'sides, most of the people I've heard bitching about the continuity of Enterprise don't seem to recognize the time-line is different, even though you're pretty much beaten over the head with the Temporal Cold War that was introduced in the pilot. Either people just like to bitch or they're just plain non-observant.

      "Wait a minute! They can't meet the Feringi, Picard first met the Feringi! WTF?! Damn Brannon and Berman!" -- I've seriously heard that stupid comment. They can remember a passing detail in an old ep of TNG, but they can't remember the Temporal Cold War, First Contact, or the that the NX-01 left space dock several days earlier than planned. Heh.

      Okay, that rant was pretty geeky. I just find it startling that people can be beaten over the head with information and still not get it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Borg by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Even if this ep bombs, there's still some potential here. (Note: I'll never forgive Voyager for pussifying the Borg.)"

      Actully I think most would agree putting some pussy in the borg was a nice move.

    5. Re:Borg by h3llfish · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, a different timeline is one thing, but the word "before" just can't be correct. The whole enterprise series by definition takes place long after the time of Cochran and Company. Not before - after.

      I understand what you're saying... you mean that from the point of view of Archer and crew, the past has not yet been sullied by the intrustion of the Borg and Picard. I'm not really sure what difference that makes though, since it's been established that Picard and co "fixed" the past so that it was close enough to what had originally occured that there were no significant differences.

      That being the case, then why does it matter if Archer is in the same timeline or not? It's a given that the future can be changed... we've seen that again and again. So anything that happens to Archer has ramifications for all subsequent events. But if Berman was so bold as to say that events had become so messed up that all of the things in previous shows didn't happen, wouldn't we then have to form a mob and KILL him?

      Shawn

      A trekkie who has had sex with actual girls... and has the pictures to prove it.

    6. Re:Borg by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I understand what you're saying... you mean that from the point of view of Archer and crew, the past has not yet been sullied by the intrustion of the Borg and Picard"

      No, I'm saying that the timeline that Archer exists in, Picard and the Borg *have* changed the time line. The big startling clue here is that the NX-01 was named Enterprise, yet the NX-01 was never mentioned in any of the other series. This wouldn't be a big deal except the ready room on the Enterprise-D depicts all of the ships named Enterprise starting with the aircraft carrier in service today.

      " I'm not really sure what difference that makes though, since it's been established that Picard and co "fixed" the past so that it was close enough to what had originally occured that there were no significant differences."

      Not really. We're missing a key bit of information here: Did the Enterprise-E return to the timeline it originally came from, or did it show up in the post-FC timeline? That isn't clear, and the method of travel used makes the answer to that question a bit fuzzy. We (the audience) don't know for sure what happened right after that.

      "That being the case, then why does it matter if Archer is in the same timeline or not? It's a given that the future can be changed... we've seen that again and again. So anything that happens to Archer has ramifications for all subsequent events. But if Berman was so bold as to say that events had become so messed up that all of the things in previous shows didn't happen, wouldn't we then have to form a mob and KILL him?"

      The point I was making is that STTNG, TOS, DS9, even VOY took place happened before the time-line was polluted. Archer exists in the polluted time-line. That means that no matter what happens in Enterprise, the original series would be completely in tact. Confusing? Watch Back to the Future 2. That movie explains what I'm talking about better than I can here on Slashdot. There'd be no reason to get mad at Berman over it, they found a unique way to tell a new story. It'd be boring if we saw a documentary of passing references over 24 seasons of Star Trek.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Borg by aanantha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that there is a potential for history to be rewritten, but I think the "Yesterday's Enterprise" episode would be a bad example. In the time travel scenarios in the original Star Trek and the The Next Generation, we've been seeing self reenforcing loops in time.

      Take "Yesterday's Enterprise". If the Enterprise-D had never helped the Enterprise-C in the "original" timeline, wouldn't the C have been destroyed? They were on the verge of destruction before they went forward in time. My understanding was that history had never really been rewritten, except for the short span of time where the "C" had gone into the future. When the "C" went back, they eventually caused the Klingon-Federation peace treaty and the normal timeline was made possible. Nothing the "C" did has caused the normal timeline to be any different from our perspective. Any evidence of Tasha Yar existing in the past was erased as far as the Federation knew until Sela Yar made her appearance later.

      Also, in the "Voyage Home", the Enterprise crew didn't make any changes to the past that we'd be aware of. A couple of whales and a whale researcher disappeared. Kirk sold off his pair of glasses, which he later re-acquired as antiques. Scotty gave away transparent aluminum technology, but then points out that maybe the guy he gave it to was recorded as the inventor anyway.

      And in "First Contact", we don't really know that history turned out to be any different than the way the Next Generation crew had originally perceived it. There hasn't (yet) been any evidence of it. Cochrane did everything they remembered him doing. And in all the cases where they divulged the future to Cochrane, it might have made him do all the things they remembered him to have done.

      The only case I remember of a non-sustaining loop in time was that TNG episode where the Enterprise-D kept getting destroyed until Data figured out what message to send back to get them out of the loop. That might establish the possibility in Trekdom that history can be rewritten. All that Star Trek series might just be one iteration of that non-sustaining loop.

      That would be really lame of B&B to do this. But I wouldn't put it past them. They've already demonstrated that they have little regard for Roddenberry's work. Hasn't Braga been quoted as saying that he didn't like the original Star Trek series? Honestly, if those guys want to rejuvinate Star Trek they don't need to rewrite Star Trek history. They could try sticking to the spirit of Star Trek instead of just recycling old plots and techonobabble. How often did the original Star Trek revisit planets or mention the events of previous episodes? Star Trek 2 might have been the first time that's happened.

      But I'm not saying that every episode should be independant. Babylon 5's strength was that hardly anything happened in an episode that wasn't important later on. But even Babylon 5 had a introduction, middle, and conclusion. It was like a novel told over 5 years. But there was a real ending, and the ending had signficance. But Star Trek just drags on now. If B&B want creative freedom, maybe they shouldn't have made a show that occurs between First Contact and the original Star Trek. Haven't we explored Vulcans to death by now? It was interesting the first time around with Spock, and probably because he was only half Vulcan.

  2. A Star Trek "First"? by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's going to happen, a trekkie is going to lose his virginity?

    1. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's going to happen, a trekkie is going to lose his virginity?

      Sure that could happen... in an episode where they travel to an alternate dimension.

    2. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by AmateurCoder · · Score: 5, Informative
      I didn't see the trailer either but after you mentioned it I checked out the summary of the next episode at upn.com/shows/enterprise . Here it is:

      "Regeneration"

      An excavation team on Earth makes an astounding discovery when they uncover a pair of never-seen-before cybernetic aliens (Borg drones) buried in the Arctic Circle. When these aliens mysteriously revive themselves and take off into space in one of the Earth ships, Enterprise is called upon to investigate and stop them. Meanwhile, as Archer and the crew close in on the fleeing aliens, the drones send a signal back to The Collective meaning regardless of what happens in this fight, humans and the Borg are destined to meet again.

      I totally agree with you that including the borg into the preqel series would ruin it.
    3. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by anonymous+loser · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is exactly why I watch the show. I like to think of it as Enterprise, starring Jolene Blalock's Ass.

    4. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by Motor · · Score: 4, Funny

      You didn't see the trailer after last night's episode?

      No... I'm in the UK.

      Apparently they ARE going to involve the Borg.

      Oh dear. They really do need new writers, don't they.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
    5. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the Enterprise encounters a large unchartered cloud of hydrogen, helium and various heavy elements. Further scanning concludes, without any incidents happening, that the large cloud of hydrogen, helium and various heavy elements is indeed a large cloud of hydrogen, helium and various heavy elements. Or:

      The Enterprise and her crew encounter a new species, who after careful consideration and non-rash diplomatic talks agrees to sign a peace treaty with the federation. Technology and businees booms as trade starts between the federation and the new species, who aren't afflicted with some sort of plague, who aren't warlike and who don't have any custms that piss of any runaway Federation captains with ships too small for their ego. Or either:

      The Enterprise and her crew suddenly realize that time has shifted ahead one hour! After several days of frantic, though conservative research and violating NO protocols regarding temporal stuff, they simply realize the Federation has instituted daylight savings and the relevant subspace message got thrown away along with the usual spam messages by the captain.

    6. Re:A Star Trek "First"? by lobsterGun · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only way the a Borg prequel episode would work would be if they were antiques Borg based on vacuume tube/hydraulic technology. Hell! even I would tune in for that!

      [ excerpt from script ]
      Evil Pre-Borg carrying a bicycle pump and a light bulb approaches a crewman.

      Crewman: Dude! what the hell are you doing?

      Pre-Borg: I'm assimilating you. Please do not resist (attempts to jam lightbulb into crewmans neck)

      Crewman: OW! goddammit! enough with that lightbulb already!

      Pre-Borg: It's not a lightbulb, It's a vacuum tube.

      Crewman: Whatever Poindexter. (Punches pre-borg. The sound of glass shattering is heard)

      Pre-Borg: Fuck! (slumps to the ground)

  3. Please god, by Red+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No holodeck.
    No Q

    --
    "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
    ~Epictetus
    1. Re:Please god, by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hey, it could be worse:
      • [Archer] I'd like to introduce our newest crew member, Ensign Binks.
      • [Binks] Meesa muy-muy pleased to meet allayousa
      • [Trekkies everywhere] Right, where did I put that fully-functional replica phase pistol?
    2. Re:Please god, by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You KNOW they will get around it, because time is meaningless to the Q, so he could have visited Jean Luke before he visits Archer. At least that is THEIR story, and they would stick to it ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. Forget about new aliens and hairdos... by ajuda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what they need is new writers.

    1. Re:Forget about new aliens and hairdos... by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what they need is new writers.

      Dude, if I had the power to get J. Michael Straczynski on board, I'd do it in a second.

      Only thing is, he's used to working with coherent, well-planned, non-contradictory storylines. I doubt even he could save Enterprise or Trek as a whole at this point.

    2. Re:Forget about new aliens and hairdos... by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What Trek needs is to dump Berman and his lackeys.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

  5. But, no! by jonabbey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been loving the show this season. Great characters, a focus on the kind of culture clash stories that TOS specialized in..

    It sounds like they're not getting the ratings that they want, but I hope they don't change the show too much. An alien probe coming to earth which wreaks havoc? Haven't we seen that before?

    1. Re:But, no! by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've been loving the show this season.
      While I won't say I'm loving it, it definitely shows signs of promise this season. "Cogenitor" and "The Breach" were both actually thought-provoking and well-written science fiction episodes that were not merely about the existence of cool tech or weird aliens, but explored their impacts. "Cogenitor" from the ads in particular looked like it was going to be pathetic and obvious, but it was not. And "Future Tense" was a very good science fiction action episode. It got me watching again.

      So, I may not be loving, but I'm watching. Hopefully whatever this "new direction" is, it isn't back in the direction of more decontamination gel rubdowns.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  6. It's dead, Jim. by whig · · Score: 4, Funny

    says it all

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
    1. Re:It's dead, Jim. by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      More like:

      "It's dead Jim, let's kick it around some more."

      "It's dead Jim. But this is StarTrek, so we can solve the problem by 'modulating the frequency'."


      More like, why don't YOU modulate the frequency, NERD?
      (only funny if you are a regular reader of the Strongbad Emails, particularly this one.)

      For everyone else:

      Speaking from experience, I can tell you that the best way to fix any problem is to modify the sensor array to emit an inverse tachyon pulse into the heart of the anomaly.

      Or go ask Data, but ask him while he's in the Holodeck playing Sherlock Holmes.

  7. Fire Berman! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful
    He is a terrible writer and the same guy who wrote the lame voyager series. Bring back some of the old ST:TNG writers. Pay them for what they are worth.

    New aliens and a few hairdo's wont change the story or character dynamics which reack.

    1. Re:Fire Berman! by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 4, Interesting

      God, yeah....Berman's idea of a different culture is one with an opressed third gender? Woah! That's innovation! And there's a male and female of the species and they're married? Unbelievable....

      I've thought (and still do) that Enterprise had the most potential since TNG, which I rather enjoyed most times. The biggest mistakes have been a) trying to hard to shoehorn foreshadowing of every bloody event in the future into the show, b) slavishly obeying the "resolve in one episode" law (I'm very surprised that Berman's talking about going with a longer story arc - he's said in more than one interview that that was a bad and stupid idea), c) worrying way too much about consistency with the rest of the ST universe.

      Theoretically, they were trying to branch out a bit, bring in some new audience to the show. And frankly, the whole ST universe needs a good shaking up. It really wouldn't have hurt them a lot to pay lip service to continuity, but ignore it when it made the story better.

      Oh, yeah, and fire Berman. Get someone in there who can write a story without resorting to travel to other timelines.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

  8. I hope they don't use Borgs! by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Next week's episode (5/7/2003) will be a Borg episode.

    Synopsis:
    An arctic research team on Earth discovers debris from an alien vessel, nearly a century old, buried in a glacier along with the bodies of two cybernetically enhanced humanoids. Once those beings are thawed for investigation, they come to life and abduct the scientists and their transport vessel. Enterprise is called to intercept, but Captain Archer and his crew find these cyborgs to be an intractable, insidious enemy.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  9. Sex it up! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't get me wrong - I like hot babes in form-fitting clothes and all, but after Seven of Nine and T'Pol, how about a hot babe with all the nice bits PLUS an actual PERSONALITY? Sure, the physical goods are there, but their behavior isn't exactly sexy.

    "Captain, it is 1300 hours. Time for our afternoon copulation."

    Then again, since ratings are down, try a proven formula: Have Archer shave his head, grow a beard, and bring in Worf!

    1. Re:Sex it up! by nurightshu · · Score: 4, Funny

      The disturbing juxtaposition of the subject line and your last suggestion made me think of this.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
  10. Slipping all season? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been slipping the last two seasons.

    Same show, rehatched ideas, visionless direction; lather rinse repeat. Bah...it's turned into a "PC our morality is always right" and your is always wrong show. Last nights episode was a good example.

    What happened to entertainment, if I wanted to be taught morality, I would goto my local public school.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Slipping all season? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Bah...it's turned into a "PC our morality is always right" and your is always wrong show. Last nights episode was a good example."

      Err did you watch to the end of that episode? "Morality" caused somebody to commit suicide. Not only did this episode illustrate why the Prime Directive is more important than human morality, but it also showed (again) that the Enterprise really fucked up. It's startlingly different from STNG or Voyager where everything ends better for the good guys.

      What I particularly liked about the end of this episode was the chewing Trip got over the whole situation he caused. It was evident that some serious damage was caused between Archer and his First Officer. If this carries over into future episodes, we could have a heck of a story arc.

      I agree that Enterprise has been a little stale in recent episodes, but last night was a surprisingly good one. The catch is that you have to really pay attention to what's said in the end to enjoy it. Turn it off early and the whole ep is wasted.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  11. Maybe partly off-topic, but by compupc1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shouldn't Trek get it's own topic icon?

    On a side note, I'm willing to give the "new" show a try. The last couple episodes have been pretty good, and it looks like they are making some sort of an effort to address falling ratings and concerns. Of course, if the "new direction" turns out to be a trip straight South, I would bet that Enterprise won't see a 4th season.

    I just wish that in terms of production values: 1) They ditch the catsuit for T'Pol. No real Vulcan would dress like that...it's degrading. 2) They would spend a bit more time designing makeup. Bumpy foreheads don't cut it anymore and make the show look quite cheap. 3) The music needs to be a lot more thematic and bombastic. It's been slightly better lately but like the makeup, "sonic wallpaper" doesn't cut it. Give us dramatic, emotional music!

    --
    -James
    1. Re:Maybe partly off-topic, but by nytes · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just wish that in terms of production values: 1) They ditch the catsuit for T'Pol. No real Vulcan would dress like that...it's degrading.

      I agree 100%. I wanna see T'Pol without the catsuit on!

      (Sorry, that was just too easy to pass up :-)

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  12. Fucking Trek Leadership by dupper · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I woke my family screaming "NO!!!" upon reading the synopsis for the upcoming Enterprise episode "Regeneration. What the hell is wrong with B&B (Brannon Braga and Rick Berman), or whoever is responsible for this. I wasn't expecting the show to stoop to this level of gimmickery for at least several seasons (even worse with the T'Pol pon-farr-ish episode supposedly coming up), and, even then, I thought they would at least try to maintain some degree of continuity (the 200 year thing is complete BS, especially considering that subspace transmissions travel faster than the fastest starships, and Voyager would have only taken 70 years from the Delta Quadrant). Either give the show some decent writers and general creative control (ie, kill B&B in some horrible, painfuil way), or cancel the fucking series while it still has some damn dignity left.

    On the other hand, last night's episode "Cogenitor" was the first episode of Enterprise I've ever seen which actually had a reasonably original story (trigendered species and a crewmember's fuck-up with cultural interference, clearly meant to establish the principles behind the future prime directive) and which didn't do a hollyood-liberal hippocritical pussy/cop/whore-out, and have the end be all preachy, with a thousand years of injustices and hatred completely reversed with a single visit and impassioned speach by the captain (are you listening, Voyager?). Kudos on that, but the episode was still dull as an old dog's balls.

  13. The idea was blown from the beginning... by Mossfoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You want a REALLY fresh idea for Star Trek, something new and different? Well, they shouldn't have blown it from the get go. Come on, we're talking about the BEGINING of decent exploration from Earth for crying out loud! What is more interesting than the idea of being true pioneers?

    Only one problem, everything here feels the same as every other show. They still have transporters, they just don't use them on people much. They don't have tractor beams, but that's an excuse so they can have a cool lookin toilet plunger launcher instead. Their phasers aren't as powerful as later shows, but big whoop, they're still phasers. Same shit, different smell, music by a Ron Stweart wannabe.

    A show I WOULD have watched eagerly would have been one BEFORE all this technology (save the ability to travel at warp). NO transporters, NO phasers, NO tractor beams, heck no artificial gravity even (though that could be a problem cost wise and quailty wise, unless you have rotating sections like B5, though that doesn't mesh with its own "history"). And if you think that no longer makes it Star Trek, then you really are brainwashed about that show.

    Give us something different instead of the same and simply changing it a little to seem different while giving writers the exact same conventions to fall back on under different guises.

    This would help.

    Well, that and having decent writers that don't simply add the "alien with the cigarette burn on the forhead of the week" each episode.

    Oh yeah, and water polo? Who the hell watches water polo?

    --
    Fuzzy Knights: New RPG Strips Tuesday and Friday!:
    http://www.fuzzyknights.com
  14. The Trek Sex Virus by retro128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slipping is an understatement. Nothing says "it's over" like the crew encountering an alien race that requres a threesome in order to reproduce.

    Seriously, if I wanted to see a bunch of oddly proportioned women who wear too much makeup getting it on with average looking guys, I'll watch a porn.

    --
    -R
  15. Rick Berman needs to just go. by gadlaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where to begin. This is a guy who has never had the first clue about what made Star Trek successful and will never ever know it. He killed Kirk stupidly and that was inexcusable. He's had a deathgrip on the Star Trek franchise and has been intent on squeezing the last dollar out of it. It's no fun, it's Politically Correct and boring. There isn't anyone 'Boldly going where no man has gone before' - it's all the same aliens with a different rubber thing on their heads. It's all about United Nations like problems and the proper UN type solutions. It's just completely unwatchable and just plain sad. Berman- don't go away mad, just go away.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  16. *sigh* by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do think the Borg have been done to death. They were at their best in Next Generation, and I still give props to whoever thought them up in the first place. Definitely one of the most original sci-fi enemies ever.

    I couldn't stand their portrayal in First Contact (the idea of self-aware Borg queens will never sit with me) but at least they retained the menace they kept from Next Generation. Voyager was where they were finally ruined for me; they appeared in a disproportionate number of episodes, becoming less and less menacing, almost comical. This isn't something that has to happen as one grows more familiar with an enemy.

    Now in Enterprise, the Borg are showing up yet again, and the audience is already way ahead of the game. I'd like to think that the writers are cleverly establishing the Borg as a hidden, secret determinant of much of humankind's history, with connections and impacts deeper than most realize. I'd like to think that, because it's either that or they've simply run out of ideas.

    1. Re:*sigh* by hal200 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. My problem with bringing the borg to Enterprise (which I rarely watch anyway) is that they are simply too powerful an enemy to be dealt with in a reasonable manner.

      I mean, these are the same borg that fought their way to Earth in the 24th century, against 24th century weapons and defenses, then traveled back in time to the 22nd century. They kicked righteous Federation ass. Now they're being unleashed on 22nd century Enterprise? What the hell are the writers thinking?

      This is the same Enterprise that has 'polarized hull plating', pulse cannons and a top speed of what? Warp 5? It's been established that they're not even a match for the Vulcans! And they're pairing them up against the Borg who can rip through 24th century shields in a couple of minutes, are nearly immune to phasers and photon torpedoes and can propel their ships at speeds well above warp 10 using transwarp?

      If you want an idea of how badly this will go for the good guys, go watch the first ST:TNG borg episode again, and multiply the ass whooping that Picard and crew took by 100. It's like putting Pee Wee Herman in the ring against Mike Tyson on PCP. It's pretty much guaranteed to be short, brutal and very messy.

      The only way they'll be able to hit the proverbial 'reset' button in an hour is by introducing some horrible plot device, because there is no plausible way for the crew to handle something like this on their own. Basically, the entire episode is going to go like this: (given an episode length of 47 minutes without commercials)

      1) Enterprise is called to investigate (20 minutes)
      2) The Borg kick Enterprise's ass. (20 minutes)
      3) A miracle happens. (5 minutes)
      4) Everyone lives happily ever after. (2 minutes)

      Ugh. I think I'll just save my brain the agony, thank you very much. This is just another example of one of the three classic horrible sci-fi plots. There is no faster way to ruin a good story than by introducing time travel, clones or alternate dimensions. (and heaven help you if you manage to mire your audience in all three!) Yes, it is possible to do them right, but it's dreadfully easy to do them wrong...so very wrong.

      --

      I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

  17. The only way by actappan · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only way to save enterprise is to put Archer in an orange sweatshirt and have him die every episode.

    --
    \Drew National Data Director, John Edwards for President
  18. Re:the "problem" with Enterprise... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, just so everyone can flame me for being a philistine, I'll list the various flavours of Star Trek in the order in which I rate them: DS9, TNG, Voyager, TOS, Enterprise.

    Now, given that I find watching all but a handful of episodes of TOS a painful experience, that should give you some indication of how badly I think of Enterprise.

    Granted, I've only watched about 8-10 episodes of this latest show, but it doesn't take more than that to see that this latest offering is dire, dire, dire.

    It's not that the show predates all other Treks per se, it's just that putting it before all the others shows in the Trek universe timeline seriously limits the writers as to what they can and can't do with the characters, races and technology available to them. Putting your writers in a creative straightjacket, limiting their creative scope and presenting the viewers with a wider story that leads them somewhere that they've already been doesn't work very well - just look at the Star Wars prequels for evidence. (So that's yes to your first question; but not for the reasons that you were probably expecting.)

    And it's not just that it rewrites Star Trek history on the fly (Klingons that look like TNG/DS9/Voyager versions, rather than TOS oneS, etc), rather that it does so so badly. (So that's a yes to your second question; it's not entirely faithful to the previously established Trek universe.)

    But if I had to give just one reason why Enterprise sucks it would be that it's dull as dishwater. None of the characters seem to have any depth to them, and there isn't a single one that I can empathise or admire in the way that I do Data, Worf, Picard, Sisko, Odo, O'Brien, Chakotay or Spock.

    Frankly, Enterprise seems like a one-dimensional show with a bunch of one-dimensional characters.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  19. It's already oversexed... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how about a hot babe with all the nice bits PLUS an actual PERSONALITY?

    Wrong. Treat me like I'm not a walking lump of hormones. I have an intelligent brain and I like to watch intelligent shows that don't use sex as a replacement for a storyline.

    The sex factor in Enterprise was already overused from episode one. "Hey, I have a great idea, let's have T'Pol strip down to her underwear, and rub lotion all over the studly guy. And we'll make it the longest scene in the show, to show off the 'smart storyline'. That's gotta be original, and it will appeal to the intelligent women in the audience."

    What the hell were they thinking? How the hell can I take this show seriously when they stoop so low?

    I'd rather them focus on the storyline. There are dozens of TV shows with cute girls, even some with personality, but few of the shows are worth watching.

    How about some good plots with believable struggles science. Time travel? Please...

    I miss Babylon 5. Granted, the characters weren't very sexy, some of the acting was cheesy, and yes the Vorlon-Shadow war had a really stupid ending, but in general it had a good, consistant storyline which kept me coming back episode after episode. I have most of Season 3 & 4 on tape, and I still watch them.

    Deep Space Nine got really damn good, and it had better actors then B5.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  20. The Eugenics Wars by DeadVulcan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree with those saying there's been no imagination in coming up with new Star Trek series. They are all carbon copies of each other, with the possible exception of DS9.

    In the vein of different Star Trek stories, has anyone read the novel(s) "The Eugenics Wars: The Rise and Fall of Khan Noonien Singh?" It's in two parts, and I'm impatiently waiting for the second to appear in paperback.

    I know this is just slightly off-topic, but I must talk about it!

    The story (obviously) follows the life of Khan. However, in an absolute stroke of genius, the writer also included the character of Gary Seven, the mysterious alien-bred human introduced in the original series. The episode was clearly being set up to be spun off, but never did.

    As I said before, I think that putting Gary Seven and Khan on the same stage (or rather, realizing that they would have been contemporaries) was a stroke of genius. They're both genetically enhanced, but with completely opposite political and personal ideologies.You could not ask for two men more perfectly crafted to oppose each other in a dramatic conflict.

    Gary Seven was sent to Earth to quietly pull strings and guide world events for the betterment of the human race. Khan actually has similar motives, but intends to fix the world by forcibly taking control of everything. He's not the obsessed villain of ST:TWOK (not yet, anyway), and he's a thoroughly believable character.

    It's amazing that the stage, the plot, and the characters for this story could all emerge by accident! When you realize they were on the same planet at the same time, you realize they must have butted heads.

    Make a miniseries of this, I say. I'd be all over it.

    BTW, if you haven't read the book, I highly recommend it. There's a little bit of gratuitous reference-dropping, but I have nothing else bad to say about it. Read it!

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  21. Ripping off JMS *again*? by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    J. Michael Straczynski, creator of Babylon 5, deserves credit for a bunch of creative new ideas... that were lifted for Star Trek.

    Babylon 5 had a heavy story arc. Later, Deep Space 9 developed a story arc. Babylon 5 used CGI heavily when Trek was using models. Of course Trek now uses CGI; perhaps that one was inevitable, but they probably adopted it sooner because of the example of Babylon 5.

    After Babylon 5, JMS had a short-lived series called Crusade. The ship in Crusade had a limited amount of time to find a cure that would save the lives of all humans on Earth. Now we find out that Enterprise is turning into Crusade -- they will have to go and stop the Xindi super-weapon.

    And new hair styles? Given that Babylon 5 was famous for its wild hair styles, I was amazed they were hyping this.

    All that said -- I'll try to hope. Stopping a superweapon is closer to "Trek with phasers" than preachy episodes like "Cogenitor". I'd like to see it be fun and exciting, with far less lecturing.

    But I'm afraid that next week (the Borg prequel) is going to be the "jump the shark" episode.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  22. The Reset Button by shade1475 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I see this whole thing violating continuity even more (big war before the big Romulan War that should be coming up soon? come on...) but it's not going to matter.
    I'm starting to wonder if the whole "Temporal Cold War" thing is just going to be a really convenient Trek Reset Button when they wind the series down/do anything substantial. Aliens from the future, Warship Enterprise, lotsa death, destruction, and mayhem--and then whoops! It was all an alternate timeline that was never supposed to happen, so the 29th century time guys put it all straight by the end of the season, if not the episode.
    Enterprise is fine for dumb fun, but it could be sooo much better. I wish it was.

  23. Pussifying the Borg by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even if this ep bombs, there's still some potential here. (Note: I'll never forgive Voyager for pussifying the Borg.)


    Dude, Voyager didn't pussify the Borg -- Next Gen did it.

    Remember when we first saw them, and they were all bad ass? They were adjusting their shields for different phaser frequencies and stuff?

    Then there was that whole Locutus thing . . . man, that sucked for us.

    But through it all, the Borg were kicking ass, and not even bothering to take names . . . until some last-season Next Gen episode (forgive me or not knowing the title) where all it took to kill a Borg was popping the little tube out of its face.

    What?!

    From certain death for all humans, to falling down in a spray of liquid nitrogen just like that?

    Worst. Screwing up of a cool bad guy. EVER.

  24. Actually, that kind of makes sense... by clambake · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, if you think about all the numbskulls on TNG that got assimilated, it only makes sense that their addition would have a negative impact on the collective... er, present company excluded?

  25. Stand-Alone? Oh dear. by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "What we are about to do is a first for STAR TREK," Berman tells TVG. "In the past, our captains have had the general mission to explore outer space and, in the case of Voyager, a mission to find a way back home. But there has never been a Trek series built around a specific mission and specific stakes-in this case, the very future of mankind."

    Ahh, right, so the DS9 Delta Quadrant stuff never happened. Mm.

    This sounds *well* sucky, and goes on to fulfil a pet hate of mine which is that episodes will no longer be 'stand-alone'. Which is a pity.

    --
    Smegma.
  26. Creation of the Borg by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Informative

    I do think the Borg have been done to death. They were at their best in Next Generation, and I still give props to whoever thought them up in the first place. Definitely one of the most original sci-fi enemies ever.


    It was Michael Piller who created the Borg, and it was he who made them the terrifying badasses that they were in Best of Both Worlds I&II.

    On the DVD for Season 3 or 4, Michael says that he was planning to leave TNG after he wrote Best of Both Worlds Part I, so he went ahead and made them so bad ass, and so undefeatable, because "someone else would have to figure out what to do with them."

    Then Gene convinced him to stick around another year, so he ended up being "someone else!"

    I think this is awesome, and it's a good lesson for writers: get your characters into trouble. Put them in a place where REAL death is certain, and then let them figure out how to get out of it. Michael wrote those stories without any hesitation or fear, and that's why they are two of the best TNG episodes ever.

    For the record: In my opinion, Michael Piller is responsible for some of the best stories -- well, some of the best everything -- on The Next Generation.