Slashdot Mirror


NASA Sending Probe to Saturn

Plissken writes "Nasa along with the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency have launched a towards Saturn in hopes of obtaining vital data to help understand the mysterious, vast region. The Cassini-Huygens mission is composed of two elements: The Cassini orbiter that will orbit Saturn and it's moons for four years, and the Huygens probe will dive into the depths of Titan and land on it's surface. If all goes well, more than 200 scientists worldwide will study the data collected."

24 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. 200 scientists by E.+T.+Alveron · · Score: 3, Insightful
    it's a shame space probe data is disseminated to only the 200 with influence/money/connections to NASA's good ol boy network...

    someone tell me the data is public domain... anyone?

    1. Re:200 scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All the data from NASA missions is normally
      released in the public domain after 12 months.
      The delay is to give their scientists a head
      start in the publicating their work.

      In some cases the data is witheld like in the
      case of the almost global world RADAR map with
      30 m resolution

    2. Re:200 scientists by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So what exactly would you do with the raw data from the probe? They're probably just giving it out to people who are actually capable of using it. There'd be no point NASA being slashdotted by people who have absolutely no use for raw data just going in to have a look...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:200 scientists by Vulch · · Score: 5, Informative

      The researchers who get immediate access to the data are the ones who have already spent a decade or more of their lives working on the project. In return for their long-term commitment to the project they get the raw data first. After an agreed amount of time, which can vary from project to project but is meant to be long enough to analyse the numbers and write a paper on the subject, the data is made more widely available.

      Most space missions including the Hubble Telescope work the same way. Apart from the occasional "pretty" picture used for publicity, the researchers who have planned a set of observations get the first chance to analyse and publish. Those who don't want to make the up-front commitment just have to be patient.

  2. Ugh, this is 6 1/2 years old by Crazieeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew /. liked to post old stuff, but its starting to get out of hand

  3. Measurements.... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nasa along with the European Space Agency

    ESA Engineer: We need to calibrate the spinoff vector 3 micrometers forward.
    NASA Engineer: Micrometers?
    ESA Engineer: Yes, metric units.
    NASA Engineer: Metric?

    A bit over the top perhaps, but it's not like it hasn't happened before ;)

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Measurements.... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, excuse me?

      This has been beaten to death already. Can we get over the stupid metric jokes? And if your going to do them, can you at least get them RIGHT?

      I am quite positive that ESA would use metric, and infact, NASA uses metric too.

      Why did we lose the Mars Climate Orbiter? Precisely because NASA *does* use Metric, but NASA's outsourcing to Lockheed Martin, unfortunately, doesn't. American coroporations persist on using ye olde system, while NASA infact DOES use metric.

      So don't pay out NASA, they did it right. Lockheed Martin fucked this one up.

      D.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    2. Re:Measurements.... by stoborrobots · · Score: 3, Funny

      IIRC, the Fuckup was that Lockheed HAD used metric measurements, but NASA "corrected" the metric coordinates into the imperial ones before sending them...

      So NASA bad, LM good... or something like that...

    3. Re:Measurements.... by CausticWindow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You almost make it sound like I-point-out-stupid-Americans exercises are bad.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    4. Re:Measurements.... by thogard · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Brits had a base 10 system but they gave up centuries ago. The French decide that there are 10,000,000 from the pole to the equator but can't get their figures right.

      It turns out that the meter isn't a good "human" unit for most applications. All day I've been working on building a computer room in Australia. They used to use a foot as unit of measure but now use metric and have for 20+ years. The problem is none of the locals now know metric or imperial. I had a flatemate that was an architecture student at Melboure Uni. Not one of her friends who where in the same program could tell me how wide the lounge room was within 2 meters (its 16 ft as built in the finest tradtions in the 1850's). To me this is very scary considering they are all at least 3 years into an architecture degree.

      The plywood flooring we bought was 3.6m by .9m and it was but some of the other bits that were sold as some x.y meter were infact even feet down to .001 while they were not close to the sold as size.

      All the bolts are in inch sizes but the drill bits are metric. Its a real mess.

      I'm quite happy to deal with the metric system nearly everywhere execpt when it comes to building materials and in that case feet work much better. I know builders in the US that never need to write down measurements, the locals need a spreadsheet to keep the numbers together for small projects.

      If the local police hear that a suspect is 5'10, they figure +/- 2 inches while if someone says 180 cm they figure +/- 20cm (thats 4x larger than 2 in)

      Realestate in Australia is sold in "square" units (a square, not a square something but simply a square) that only one out of 20 people know about. It could be a quare meter or an acre and most people wouldn't have a clue.

      Most people under 20 in Australia have never delt with non-metric (except for how tall people are an how heavy babies are) and couldn't tell you how big a foot is if they had too but they aren't much better for metric. The Kiwis are about as bad (so I'm not just picking on the Aussies, I just know more of them)

      I propose that a metric foot be a nano-light second (about .299m). That would give the metric world a decent unit for measurement for building.

  4. Old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    This mission started several years ago.
    I suppose the submitter wanted both karma and attention whoring. Soon we'll see the following story:

    New transportation system invented.

    Megawhore writes: I seems that researchers have invented a revolutionary new transportation system called wheel which enables people to get around loads without carrying them....
    I think this will enable us to transport our MP3 server's around.

  5. Huh? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is supposed to be new news??? This is like 7 years old! Cassini has been mentioned on slashdot numerous times, and the fact that Cassini-Huygens is en route to Saturn is pretty common knowledge... why suddenly make a story about it now, as if NASA only just launched this beast...

    Infact there was alot of Cassini news on slashdot (and other sites) when Cassini did its Jupiter flyby, alowing us to examine and study jupiter from 2 vantage points... Cassini on its flyby, and Galileo in orbit.

    Anyway. This'll be fantastic news once Cassini does approach Saturn, and inserts itself into orbit!

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  6. Old news or Premature news by steve.m · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cassini was launched 15th Oct 1997, and will insert into orbit around Saturn 1st July 2004.

    The spacecraft is in good health and is undergoing routine checkouts of the systems and is downlinking pictues of Saturn.

    Not exactly front page news....

  7. Re:What's the news? by FTL · · Score: 4, Informative
    > It launched in October 2002

    It was launched in 1997

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  8. In other news... by BTWR · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA launched two probes to the outer solar system in the late 1970's: Voyager and Voyager 2. Slashdot is just reporting this amazing story today...

  9. And this is 'recent' news? by GraWil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well it seems that CowboyNeal has just awoken from a five year coma. The Cassini-Huygens satellite is currently nearing the end of its seven-year voyage to Saturn! It was launched on way back in October 1997 and will arrive in July 2004. In December 2004 the Huygens probe will be ejected from the orbiter and will descend into Titan's cloudy atmosphere. For those that care, there is a huge archive of Cassini Jupiter data availible. Sadly, there are few (if any) Jupiter publications as it seems a few NASA engineers & scientists are still mucking around with the calibration.

  10. We only have 25 left now, right? by KFury · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nasa along with the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency have launched a towards Saturn"

    Goddamn. They're spending our letters like they grow on trees. Sure, today they're just launching 'a', but tomorrow it'll be 'x', and then 't'. I want to know when they're planning on launching'u' and 'i' in to space...

  11. Re:Why all the fuss over finding primordial life? by stoborrobots · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But that just raises a less tractable question, how do you guess what to look for?

    It's very likely that there is life out there which is not similar to ours... but where do we look?

    Examining everything is impossible... there are just too many places to look, and too many things to look for. We are unlikely to find those (non-relationship-guide-human-females) Silicon-based Venusians unless they were broadcasting in English on FM frequencies. And even then, we'd probably not notice.

    Looking for things like us gives us a target to work towards.

    And every little while, there is something slightly off the main track which is interesting, and we find out more about our universe. Maybe even discover silicon-based life in an environment similar to ours somewhere. That could then open our eyes to what to look for to find silicon-based life elsewhere. Then we turn to Venus and see what was staring us in the face all along.

    So we are not assuming that "all life is created in our image". We are just using all the models of life we currently know of to start our search.

  12. here's a more interesting story... by g4dget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Japan just launched a space probe for a sample return mission from an asteroid. Here is a home page for the mission (but rather outdated). Apparently, it also uses electric propulsion.

  13. Huygens probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    Titan is the only moon in the entire solar system with a significant atmosphere. It is 50% thicker than Earth's atmosphere. In theory, someone could walk around on the surface of Titan with nothing but an oxegen mask, and some warm clothes.

    So far, all we have seen of Titan is the Orange clouds circling the planet. The Huygens probe will dive through Titan's atmosphere and reveal what lies below the clouds.

  14. Re:Why all the fuss over finding primordial life? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But if we found life on Titan, it would likely be in the very early stages and it wouldn't be particularly interesting. So I don't see why we're making a huge fuss over it.

    Taking this logic to the extreme, we should only bother to look for not just life, but actuall civilications at least as advanced as our own.. right?

    Wrong! By looking somewhere close and looking for something roughtly simular to the various forms of life we know from earth we can learn a lot. First and foremost, we'll learn that the earth isn't anything special. There is life out there, not just in our imagination, not just around distant stars, but basicly right out there in our own back yard. True, there could exist siliconbased life in the volcanoes on Venus - possible with a life-chemestry analog to the one we find in creatures here on earth that lives near black smokers - but it's a good idea to go look places where we and our probes can surive first, isn't it?

    And maybe we are looking in the right place for the right thing. You never know before you actually takes a look...

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  15. Pretty DAMN warm cloths by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, as far as we know, Titan has 150% the atmospheric pressure at surface level as does the Earth, and those gases are not corrosive/poisonous to human life.

    However, the surface temperature of Titan is 95 Kelvin. Liquid nitrogen is 75 Kelvin at 1 atmosphere pressure. Water ice melts at 273 Kelvin at one atmosphere. Water boils at 373 Kelvin at one atmosphere.

    You would need some pretty DAMN warm clothes. In fact, you would need better insulation on Titan than you would on the dark side of the Moon, as Titan's atmosphere would be conducting and convecting heat away from you at a prodigious rate.

  16. Whoa dude by madmarcel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like dude...you can assume "there's guaranteed to be more life *somewhere* in the galaxy" all you want, nobody is gonna believe you until we actually find some (proof of) life on/in a place other than earth.

    Let's start by looking in the obvious places first.
    It doesn't matter so much WHAT we find, as long as we find something. Then we can see whether [we|life on earth] is a fluke or not. (And we can see whether or not there are/have been paralllellls in the development of either - or whether one is the origin of the other...etc etc :)

    And obviously, by looking in obvious (and familiar) places, we increase the probability that we will actually recognize the life-forms that we find!

    e.g.
    Silicon life-forms? Sure...eh..ok...how do you know it's alive? What might be a hundred years to carbon-based life-forms might be 1 second of comparative time to a silicon based-lifeform (or even the inverse of that :) How does either one see/know that the other is alive? How does a silicon-based lifeform perceive the world? Does it actually have senses? Do those senses overlap our own?

    Let's start by finding alien bacteria and stuff like that....much easier :)

    Oh, just a thought:

    ** If NASA *DO* find signs of life on another planet then I think the same thing will happen as what happened with the so-called 'martian' bacteria that supposedly arrived on earth by hopping on a comet/asteroid/rock -> We will end up with endless arguments over cross-contamination and whether or not we put those bugs there in the first place.
    Space might be freakin' cold and a very convenient vacuum, but it doesn't stop pollen and bacteria and god knows what else from happily travelling along with our space-probes :o
    (And I need someone to confirm this: Was there stuff growing on the outside of ol' MIR? or is that a myth?)

    I was going to add another bit on how religious groups might get upset when the scientific community announces they've found life on other planets....but that's just asking for a troll-rating (:o (Hmm...some cults/sects would be ecstatic I'd imagine ;)

  17. Re:Why all the fuss over finding primordial life? by mikerich · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't see why we're so interested in Titan. The big deal about Titan is it might have life on it. But the fact is, we live in a vast universe and the possibility that we are the only life is very slim. It's also a particularly arrogant and foolish belief. But if we found life on Titan, it would likely be in the very early stages and it wouldn't be particularly interesting. So I don't see why we're making a huge fuss over it.

    I can think of two reasons, the first is purely for the novelty of it - Titan has an atmosphere, no other satellite does.

    The second is more important. Titan appears to have a mixture of organic compounds and nitrogen in its atmosphere, which would make it very similar to the primordial atmosphere on Earth. if we can look at the chemistry of the Titan atmosphere and see what is happening to the compounds on Titan under the influence of solar radiation, we can start to work out what happened on Earth all those billions of years ago.

    I don't think anyone is seriously expecting to find life on Titan, the surface temperature is so low that most chemistry has effectively ground to a halt.

    And even if you aren't excited at the mission, think of the awe-inspiring pictures we're going to get of Saturn and its rings.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.