Slashdot Mirror


New Loudspeaker Eliminates Distortive Influence

fejrskov writes "The Danish audio/video company 'Bang & Olufsen' announced a new loudspeaker which promises to eliminate the bad influence from walls, floors and ceilings on the sound. This is achieved by using two technologies: ALT (Acoustic Lens Technology) uses sound dispersing lenses to make sound travel equally in all directions. ABC (Adaptive Bass Control) involves sliding a tiny microphone out at the base of the speaker, playing a series of test sounds, and adapting the bass according to the measured acoustic response. Each active loudspeaker contains amplifiers for a total of 2500W (!) output using B&O's patented ICEPower concept. The price? Approximately 55.000 Danish kroner (8.000 Euro) each."

4 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. Audiophiles are _worse_ than drug addicts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Drug addicts will at least leave you in peace, shooting their arms up in abandoned alleyways and passing out with friends around the bong. Moreover, when drug addicts throw their money away, they're usually pumping it back into the local economy instead of shipping it off to hardware manufacturers overseas.

    Audiophiles, in contrast, aren't content to waste their money in private or among other like-minded individuals. Oh no. They have a compulsive need to prosthelitize about their audiophilia. As if there weren't enough of their kind in this world as it is, they will openly moan and complain about the quality of others' audio equipment and wax on end about the relative merits of whatever their latest hobbyhorse format is over mp3 which is far too lossy or whatever they're bitching this week.

    In all my years of knowing dope smokers and heroin addicts, I've never known any to spend half as much time trying to justify the benefits of their drug of choice as audiophiles do about their wares. It just isn't done. Drug addicts are content to enjoy their recreational substances and leave it at that. Audiophiles feel a need to go so much further.

    The other day, I was reading about the US Supreme Court's latest court case upholding the constitutionality of religious groups' use of public school space for after-school bible classes. But what I think was left out of the debate was how religious groups are such a small threat when compared to other secular groups. Whereas the liberals would like to bar the Good News club from coming to elementary schools, they would happily and cheerfully admit an audiophilia club. Whereas the Good News club is just trying to save your soul, the audiophiles are both trying to steal your soul and bilk your wallet at the same time. That is the true threat in our society today.

    I'm glad someone is finally casting the light of public scrutiny upon this pestilence in our midst. Audiophilia must be banned and criminalized as it has no place in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Our forefathers did not give their lives to found a nation where we could scamper around with our goldplated headphones and 10 megawatt amps in one giant aureal masturbatory frenzy.

  2. What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Why do they price their speakers individually? You need at least two, don't you?

    If they're trying to make a pair of $16,000 speakers look cheaper by only giving the price for one, it's not working.

    And if they sell them individually so I could buy a replacement if one of them broke, well, if I'm forking over $8000 for a speaker, it had better not fucking stop working, and there had better be a fucking good warranty on it if it fucking does.

  3. Why the hell do we care about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    People think 128kb AAC is "CD quality", so what the f*ck....put shit on a wire and call it hi-fi and most of you won't care.

  4. Re:8.000 Euro vs 8,000 Euro by thatnerdguy · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    That's a stupid franco thing

    --
    I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes