Slashdot Mirror
Internet Based Attacks in a Physical World
scubacuda writes "In light of the /. backlash against Spam King, Alan Ralsky, (in which /.ers published his info online--including an overhead shot of his house--and signed him up for junk) Simon Beyers, Aviel Rubin, and David Kormann have written a report entitled Defending Against an Internetbased Attack on the Physical World. Bruce Schneier notes that there's no easy defence against such an attack, largely because companies want to make it easy for consumers to get their promotional information:'Subscribing someone to magazines and signing them up for embarrassing catalogs is an old trick, but it has limitations because it's physically difficult to do it on a large scale. But this attack exploits the automation properties of the Internet, the Web availability of catalog request forms, and the paper world of the post office and catalog mailings. All the pieces (that) are required for the attack to work.' But as Rubin and his colleagues point out, there's a real danger in this ploy, one that few people have likely thought about. 'A scenario could be imagined where an attacker would do this to delay the arrival of an important letter, to wreak havoc on the postal system for political reasons, or even worse, to serve as a diversion for a terrorist act, such as the mailing of a contaminated letter.'"
If you don't want to be attacked on a large scale from the Internet, don't piss off Slashdot readers!
It should be a no-brainer by now, and we have shown the effectiveness!
now, is a way for the internet to deliver a flaming bag of dog poo to the doorstep of your favourite enemy and life will be complete.
Subscribing someone to magazines and signing them up for embarrassing catalogs is an old trick, but it has limitations because it's physically difficult to do it on a large scale.
Heh, I gotta rember this excuse. "No, I didn't sign up for these dirty magazienes. It is some internet conspiracy..."
That, and why is he complaigning?
If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
Tryint to get people to subscribe to Slashdot and making them read embarrassing dupes is an old trick. These attacks exploit the lazy properties of the editors as well as their unprofessionalism. All the pieces (that) are required for this attack to work. There's a real danger in this ploy, one that few people have likely thought about: "A scenario could be imagined where a story could be posted to Slashdot, and then the same story could be posted again a couple weeks later, to wreak havoc on the Internet for political reasons, or even worse, to serve as a diversion for a terrorist act, such as the posting of a goatse link."
In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
Basically, the individual is swamped with requests s/he has to answer, and using up larges amount of resources (lawyer fees).
Very similar to a DOS attack where a server has to answer loads of requests, eating away in its resources (CPU/netwerk traffic).
I both agree and disagree. For $.37, if it is in fact important, then no, I would not use the standard option. But, the USPS does have other services available, i.e. Certified Mail, Registered Mail, Delivery Confirmation, Signature Required, etc. These all cost more money, but once again, if the package is important, it is well worht the small cost.
So basically I find the USPS to be reliable, if you pay for the proper service.
Great Linux Site
If it's a rughead
So, if it is sent by William Shatner or Ted Danson it would be terrorism?
Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
or even worse, to serve as a diversion for a terrorist act, such as the mailing of a contaminated letter.'
God damn. This just makes me want to punch him in the face. Why the fuck does everyone always have to bring terrorism into everything? Ever since 9/11 we have had idiots, making comments like this about EVERYTHING. I am so sick of it.
This guy's statement require ridiculous stretches of the imagination of one to even think of a way it might benefit a terrorist. I mean, seriously, use some common sense here. If you're trying to send someone a letter full of anthrax, you want it to actually get there.
Yes, terrorists could use cars too. Maybe we should ban cars! That way a terrorist can't get his hands on a car and start running people over. Just imagine how many people he could kill by driving down a busy sidewalk! We better hurry!
Then we'll have to ban chair-lifts too. Imagine how many people would be injured or killed if someone cut the cable! We can't have that, now can we?
Ya know, they used fertilizer to make that there Oklahoma City bomb. We better get rid of fertilizer too.
But wait! That still leaves arson! We better make matches a restricted item. Can't have a terrorist going around burning down houses, no can we?
This kind of moronic reasoning makes me want to get this guy alone and "exploit the automation properties" of a few choice power tools.
See! Power tools can be used for evil! Better get rid of those too. Never mind that the benefit they provide to society far outweighs the cost. Never mind that this is supposed to be a "free" society. Won't someone please think of the terrorists?
Life is too short to proofread.
William Shatner is...... already guilty of... acts of... terrorism...... against. TheEnglishLangauge.
deus does not exist but if he does
The best way to defend from internet attack also works in the real world. Its called "Don't make large groups of people angry."
This seems like complaining that the internet allows collaboration of large numbers of like minded people. Yeah, thats the point. The failure of this article is to understand that it is not organized. Thats like saying that all the death threats the Dixie Chicks got all came from one organized structure.
Hundreds of thousands of people are not going to conspire to commit a single crime (Anthrax letter example). That's ridiculous.
To suggest that just because a large number of people are equally angry and respond in a similar way (through mailing etc), that the response is organized is stupid. People who want control set up straw man organization because they can't compete against 100,000 individuals. How many times have we heard "Those protests are completely organized by organization XYZ, they have buses that bring people in". Or in labor problems: "Its XYZ union that is causing the strike, most of the workers don't care" By using the tactic of combining the perception of voice down to a single entity, detractors can be more persuasive in gaining mindshare.
Imagine though, that instead of signing up just any plain individual with an ego problem, that you signed up a business for all of this junkmail.
Think about a company sabotaging its upstart competitor by saturating their mailbox with junk. The competitor starts missing bills, notices from vendors, etc.
Or even worse, imagine someone who has been screwed by the phone company one too many times decides to mailing list bomb their bill payment center. The costs of processing payments shoots up while mail peons have to separate the payments from the junk.
Congresspeople start getting cut off from their constituency.
etc...
And the worst part is that this is so hard to undo. Even if you take the effort to unsubscribe from every single mailing list you're on, it would take the attacker mere seconds to re-add you to all of them.
This is probably one of the most devastating non-violent denial of service attacks you can utilize today.
Moral of the story: don't piss people off.
I don't think this invalidates their conclusions, but there is one "fact" that is not actually true. The Star article states:
Sure, Google says that it found "about 259,000" search results. However, paging through the results themselves reveals that it only found 839. Including the omitted, very similar pages, there are still only 997.I think that the web has a huge number of automated forms that could be used for this kind of attack, but you would have to do a little more digging for them than the article implies.
"A scenario could be imagined where an attacker would do this to delay the arrival of an important letter, to wreak havoc on the postal system for political reasons, or even worse, to serve as a diversion for a terrorist act, such as the mailing of a contaminated letter,"
Pure FUD and crap.
Oops, I'm sorry . . . They've invoked the T-word ("terrorist"), so you are no longer allowed to express any doubts, reservations, or hesitation. Your Patriotic Duty(TM) is to wave a flag and go along with whatever they say. If you're not one of Us, you're one of Them.