Slashdot Mirror


Boeing Readying Fuel-Cell Aircraft For Tests

Makarand writes "An experimental one-person aircraft built by Boeing and powered by fuel cells could be ready for trials in Dec 2003. Once in the air the aircraft will be propelled by two 25-kilowatt fuel cells and will still rely on batteries to accelerate before taking off. If the propulsion system fails for any reason the aircraft will be capable of gently gliding back to earth. Boeing also has plans to replace re-chargeable batteries used on larger airplanes by fuel cells to cut down on pollution."

3 of 23 comments (clear)

  1. No fuel cell-powered airliners any time soon by Muhammar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Fuel cells are inherently cleaner and quieter than auxiliary power units, have fewer moving parts, and can generate more than twice as much electricity."

    This quote makes clear that they are most interested in replacing the APUs that move the hydraulics on the plane wings with something more efficient. They are also trying to demonstrate that fuel cell can power a modified glider, but this is about ultralight plane with anciliary propeller, i.e. extremely weak engine.

    Power cells will be always more difficult to operate and heavier than jet engines. No matter what the fuel (not hydrogen, to be sure), I would like to see a fuel cell that can slurp several galons per second of a fuel to provide the necessary lift for a Jumbo.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  2. demonstrate that fuel cells are safe and usable? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm dumbfounded.... But it's essentially a modified glider, so it could glide back to the ground if the propulsion fails.

    That does not make me feel safe, this makes me feel safe. Almost every piston aircraft glides to the ground on such an event - some better than others. Most folks spend tons of time practicing for engine events. Seriously... I'm way to many years into restoring a '58 Stitts and have put more love into that o200 continental engine with the express purpose of NEVER having to land because of engine failures.

    Yup, this one is for the marketing department. They might fly it to Oshkosh once, and then trailer it back for a roadshow/museem. Not something I would commute between Minneapolis and Chicago with... or leave the pattern... even it was environmentally friendly.

  3. Silent powered flight!!! by oren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, this is limited to one or two-seater ultralights and powered paragliders. So what? Bring it on! The most annoying aspect of these, for me, is the horrible incessent noise you must suffer all through the flight. You don't even get the limited noise-reduction of an enclosed cockpit.

    I've looked into the possibility of using a fuel cell to power an electrical powerglider, and the main problem was price. Fuel cells are still horribly expensive compared to glorified lawnmower engines :-)

    Perhaps if Boeing started making these in large quantities for auxilery power systems for airplanes, we'll get a chance to buy them at a more reasonable cost (maybe used ones).