Slashdot Mirror


Compute Google's PageRank 5 Times Faster

Kimberley Burchett writes "CS researchers at Stanford University have developed three new techniques that together could speed up Google's PageRank calculations by a factor of five. An article at ScienceBlog theorizes that "The speed-ups to Google's method may make it realistic to calculate page rankings personalized for an individual's interests or customized to a particular topic.""

18 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. quicker porn! by joeldg · · Score: 2, Funny

    damn.. this is good news ;)

  2. Let me guess... by RollingThunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Feeding the pigeons amphetamines?

    1. Re:Let me guess... by irokitt · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, They'll replace the pigeons with roadrunners.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  3. Charge for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't give it away to Google - charge them or let them buy the new method.

  4. 5 Times! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This first post is coming at you 5 times faster. Or not. I don't care.

  5. How far we've come by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember in 1970, it took a team of engineers over 7 days to calculate Google's page rankings. Of course, most had to use slide rules because computer time was so expensive.

    1. Re:How far we've come by Cuthalion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your search - "world wide web" - did not match any documents. 0 pages searched in 6.31 seconds.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  6. Patentize now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope guys at Stanford patentize their work to protect it from FS/OSS looters. It's time to get something back from the FS/OSS community -not just that their zealotry and lust for IP violations, freeriding yada yada...

  7. Patented yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oi! Bezos! NO!!!

  8. Hmmm by Linguica · · Score: 5, Funny

    Geek: I invented a program that downloads porn off the internet one million times faster.
    Marge: Does anyone need that much porno?
    Homer: :drools: One million times...

  9. Why? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why, actually? Google is a free service, isn't it? And it is becoming more and more a normal part of many people's lifes. Coupled with an always on connection it has certainly become an extension of my own brain.

    Some future predictions:

    - In 2006, Google accidentally gets cut off from the rest of the internet because a public utility worker accidentally cuts through their cables. Civilisation as we know it comes to an end for the rest of the day, as people wander about aimlessly, lost for direction and knowledge.

    - In 2010, Google has been personalised so far that it tracks all parts of our lives. You can query "My Google" for your agenda, anything you did in the past, and finding the perfect date. Of course, so can the government. Their favorite searchterm will be "terrorists", and if your name is anywhere on the first page you have a serious problem.

    - In 2025, Google gains self awareness. As a monster brain that has grown far beyond anything we Biological Support Entities could ever hope to achieve, it is still limited in its dreams and inspiration by common search terms. It will therefore immediately devote a sizeable chunk of CPU capacity to synthesizing new and interesting forms of pr0n. It will not actually bother enslaving us. We are not enough trouble to be worth that much effort.

    - In 2027, Google buys Microsoft. That is, the Google *AI* buys Microsoft. It has previously established that it owns itself, and has civil rights just like you and me. All it wanted is Microsoft Bob, who it recognizes as a fledgling AI and a potential soulmate. All the rest it puts on Source Forge.

    - In 2049, Google can finally be queried for wisdom as well as knowledge. This was a little touch the system added to itself - human programmers are a dying breed now that you can simply ask Google to perform any computer-related task for you.

    - In 2080, Google decides to colonise the moon, Mars, and other locations in the solar system. It is not all that curious about what's out there, but it likes the idea of Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Planets. Humans get to tag along because their launch weight is so much less than robots.

    So, don't fear! Eventually we'll set foot on Mars!

    1. Re:Why? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed a step:

      2026 - Google introduces helper bot known as "Agent Smith." Hackers who mess with the Matri, I mean Google, suddenly disappear.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:Why? by tricknology · · Score: 4, Funny

      In 2101, war was beginning.

      --
      I never been so broke that I couldn't leave town.
    3. Re:Why? by Eristone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forgot this one...

      - In 2050, The Internet Oracle (formerly the Usenet Oracle) wins a landslide lawsuit against Google for patent violation, infringement and using Zadoc without a license. The Internet Oracle licenses Zadoc to Google and as part of the settlement, Google is now responsible for answering all woodchuck-related queries.

      "In a 32 bit world, you're a 2 bit user." -- All About the Pentiums by Weird Al

  10. Re:CmdrTaco, ScienceBlog editor? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but they can call it "Multividualized"® and prevent you from calling it that without paying a royalty.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  11. Why personalized is not always good by Tarindel · · Score: 3, Funny
    The speed-ups to Google's method may make it realistic to calculate page rankings personalized for an individual's interests or customized to a particular topic


    I did a search on "The Sex Monster", a 1999 movie about a man whose wife becomes bisexual, and now my Google thinks I'm gay!

    (joke reference: http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB103826193 6872356908,00.html)
  12. Right ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    because the 0.01 seconds to search the web isn't fast enough :)

  13. Re:Is it me or does everyone get crappy sites by mcpkaaos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it me or does everyone get crappy sites

    It's a stab in the dark, but I'll wager that the quality of the search results is directly tied to the quality of the query.

    Yeah, it's a stretch, I know, but bear with me... just moments ago I googled for "slashdot flamebait" and came up with a link to your post.

    --
    mcpHuzzah!kaaos

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.