Slashdot Mirror


Nanotechnology

iConrad writes "I first found this book on EDN which described it by saying, 'It collects many ideas about what nanotech is doing and has the potential to do without the breathless hype.' I've read the Drexler books and pretty much everything else I can find about nano, so I already know that nano will save the world, replace humanity, etc., etc. (Sigh.) What I didn't know (and I think this book really told me) is what nanotechnology really is, what it is doing right now, what it will mean for businesses, and why I should care." Read on for the rest of iConrad's review. Nanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea author Mark Ratner, Daniel Ratner pages 188 publisher Prentice Hall rating 9 reviewer Conrad ISBN 0131014005 summary A (mostly) non-technical introduction to nano

In other words, I started this book very skeptical, but it convinced me. I don't know how many of you have heard of Mark Ratner, but he is credited with being the first to speculate on using individual molecules as components in electronic circuits back in 1974. If you read about molecular electronics now (or go to any moletronics conferences) you'll see his name come up constantly. He is also associate director of the nanotech institute at Northwestern University, the first dedicated nanotech center in the country. This is not like reading a lot of the books out there - he really knows his stuff.

The book starts with a general introduction, talks about hype, nanobots, and the big budgets that are out there for nanotech research. It opens a lot of questions, including ethical issues and a little bit of skepticism which I think is very healthy for a science which promises a lot, but has yet to truly distinguish itself.

After the introduction, there is a chapter which gets to the heart of matters -- it explains that nanotech is not just the ultimate level of miniaturization, but that it is special since it is at the interface of bulk properties, quantum properties, and the key elements in life processes (such as DNA). It also sets the stage for the heart of the book -- chapters on tools for the nanosciences (ever wonder why nano wasn't real until now even though Feynman started talking about it in the 1960s?), a grand tour which will quickly dispel any illusions that nanotechnology is all about nanobots a la Bill Joy and Star Trek, and chapters on smart materials, biomedical applications, sensors, optics, and electronics. There is also recap of some basic science, but not many Slashdotters will need that.

While the hype may not be breathless, these chapters left me that way. What the Ratners discuss is real, in context, and discussed intelligently and thoughtfully. They gave me enough science to explain what they are talking about but not enough to distract me and they include a dash of some appropriately wry humor to lighten things up. There are illustrations throughout and a color inset in the middle. The illustrations are clearly from lab work -- their quality varies significantly, but I found them very useful indeed.

One of my favorite aspects of the book is the sidebars -- there are sections on DNA computing, quantum computing, swarm computing, nanotubes, lab-on-a-chip, and other applications. These are short, sweet, and, as always, to the point.

The book ends with two chapters on business and ethics. Unlike most nanotech books I've read, there was some substantial thought here. Ethical issues such as intellectual property concerns as well as health issues were treated at some length. The book doesn't come to conclusions on these points -- it attempts to present a balanced discussion and actively encourages readers to enter the debate. The business section was obviously written by someone who lived through the dot-com bubble (I'm guessing this was Mark's coauthor, Dan). Some of the points were obvious, but the analysis for investors is something well worth reading (attention VCs!) and again, the authors set the sights at a reasonable level. They point out that there are fortunes to be made, but not by accident. They also make some predictions about where the money is.

My only complaints about this book were that a few of the pictures were not of ideal quality, and that the companion web site wasn't very exciting (though they promise to update it.) All in all I found the book to be an ideal mix of technical and non-technical, a superb survey of a complex field, and an interesting read throughout. It leaves all of the other "introduction to nano" books in the shade -- perhaps because it is written by a pioneer in the field as well as someone who has thought about how to make it pay. I considered it required reading for anyone who wants to understand what nano is really about.

You can purchase Nanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

16 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Nanotech by big_groo · · Score: 5, Funny
    I wish I had some Nano-probes to get rid of my awful hangover.

    Tits up to the Trolls(tm) !!! fp

  2. worms? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could they make nanites like the worms in futurama, or do I have to eat the special sauce at a space diner?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:worms? by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hmmm.... nanobots." - Homer Simpson

  3. "dispell any illusions that ..." by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny
    nanotechnology is all about nanobots a la Bill Joy and Star Trek

    What about Mystery Science Theater 3000? The nanites on that show were really great, though they did have an unfortunate habit of blowing up planets when rattled.

  4. Research buzword by bperkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone I know is a grad student at a prestigious university that shall remain nameless. He's doing research that is supposed to somehow be "nanotechnology." However, the size of devices he's dealing with is huge, about 50 to 100 microns.

    We decided that this was "mega-nanotechnology."

    1. Re:Research buzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Best definition of 'nanotechnology' yet (also heard in the halls of an august research institution...):

      'Money grubbing and wanking by half-assed theorists with neither the brains to understand physics nor the discipline to understand chemistry.'

  5. This is old news by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mork had Nano technology back in the 70s.

    "Nano Nano"

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:This is old news by ray-auch · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah but wtf kind of bot was a "Shazbot" ?

  6. Last chapters on Business and Ethics by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chapter on Business, first line: "Fire anyone who reads the chapter on ethics."

  7. Re:Where do you keep the batteries? by Baron_911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are locked into a perpetual state of EATING each other for power! Canabalnanobot!

    --
    Polaroid. See what develops!!
  8. Prey by positive · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everything I know about nanotechnology I learned by reading Michael Crichton's "Prey". Uh.. I should probably find a better reference.

    1. Re:Prey by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everything I learned about nanotechnology I learned from 7 of 9. Every time someone gets hurt, she injects a little of that nanotechnology luvin' into them and they're better before the end of the episode. I have some microscopic organizms I'd like to inject into her.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Prey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Crichton's "Congo" is the definitive reference on this topic for those that can imagine really tiny, hairless, non-talking gorillas with no diamonds.

  9. Just had to be said. by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nanotechnology, the next big thing.

  10. Disappointing review. by FroMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was really hoping this review would cover interesting things. For instance, how nano has pico compatability modes. And, like searches in a file can use regular expressions.

    Sure, some of that isn't teribley exciting nano technology, but it should be said. Nano may not have the best tech behind it, but for a simple text editor, it truly is easy to work with.

    I didn't even see any pot shots at emacs or vi in there. Truly a disappointing review.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  11. they promise to update it by tcm614ce · · Score: 2, Funny

    the companion web site wasn't very exciting (though they promise to update it.)

    What's this?! A unexciting web site that someone is promising to update? I've never heard of this practice before. Verrry Interesting...

    --
    Error: Success