Slashdot Mirror


Resume Spamming Creates Storage, Legal Snags

selan writes "Did you know that federal law requires companies to store a copy of every single resume they receive? This applies to emailed resumes too, regardless of whether the applicant got the company's name wrong or is applying for a job that doesn't exist at the company. Employers not in compliance risk being fined and could lose government contracts. The resulting storage problems are creating massive headaches at companies who are overwhelmed with bulk-emailed resumes. The Baltimore Sun has the story."

24 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. What are we waiting for?!! by levik · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's all apply for the newly opened CEO position at Microsoft!

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:What are we waiting for?!! by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny


      Forget that. I want a job at SCO!!! Don't you all?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:What are we waiting for?!! by crazyphilman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Amusing thought: what if people decided to send the resumes in, written in permamant marker on clay shingles? Or better, engraved on lead plates?

      "Um, Sir? We just got a shipment of 973 new lead-plate resumes. Some are several pages long, mostly system administration experience."

      "Crap. What next? Put them in the file cabinet."

      "We did, sir, but they fell through the floor and killed Bob in Accounting."

      "Damn! Send someone down there with a come-along and move them down to the basement with the others..."

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  2. Company looking for experienced developers... by Lugor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Send your resumes here: careers@microsoft.com.
    Bulk mailers welcome.

    1. Re:Company looking for experienced developers... by ichimunki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget that. I'm going to encode mine using CSS, that way not only do they have to store them, but reading them would violate the DMCA.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  3. use /dev/null for storage by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Funny

    you can always use /dev/null for storing all the resumes - bulk or non-bulk ;)

    1. Re:use /dev/null for storage by tato+(and+tato+only) · · Score: 5, Funny

      I use /dev/urandom. Given sufficient time, I can retrieve any resume; from it.

      --
      tato (and tato only)
      This post is strictly opinion, including the spelling.
    2. Re:use /dev/null for storage by fastdecade · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a coincidence - most recruiters use /dev/urandom to choose the best CV for the job.

  4. Found this out last week by Rorgg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When HR came to me about someone mass-sending his own resume over and over again, they wanted to know if they could avoid receiving it again. I wonder if setting up a rule on the box to automatically delete the message on arrival would have been sufficient, or if it needs to be blocked before it gets there?

  5. Does Uncle Sam play too? by Pilo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if the government has to keep all the resumes that are sent to them from people wanting municipal jobs and the like

  6. Is this article just FUD? by dtolton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found this article to be generally frustrating for several reasons:

    1. They never referenced any specific law or court
    interpretation of a law.

    What law are they talking about specifically? How can we
    check to ensure our company practices are in compliance with
    "the law". Does this law apply equally to all employers or
    does it only apply to employers with federal contracts as
    many of the equal opportunity laws do?

    2. They throw out terms like "under it's most rigid
    interpretation" and "the federal governments definition".

    By who's interpretation? The courts? The Equal Employment
    Office? Are there any court cases we can refer to in order
    to further define these interpretations? Where is this
    defined? How can we verify this?

    3. They don't give any specific guidelines for battling the
    problem.

    Is this article just writting to freak people out? They
    don't even mention how long you are "required" to keep the
    resumes on file, only that many people keep them on file for
    a year or two. Is this their preference, or is that what
    this "law" specifies.

    Overall, very frustrating and light on details. How can we as a
    company change our policies to be in accordance with some law,
    that is being rigidly interpreted by someone, somewhere?

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
  7. and who could forget... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...our favorite resume spammer, Bernard Shiffman!

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  8. Personnel departments and spam filters by cyberformer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the artucle, it looks like this applies only to corporate personnel departments, so I don't think I'm in violation of federal law when I delete all the resumes I get in my work inbox.

    Slippery slope legal question: Does this mean it's illegal to use spam filtering software that might catch a resume en-route to a personnel dept? If so, a very large proportion of companies are breaking the law.

  9. Ummm... by FroMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this terribly exciting?

    This is a no brainer. Most companies have places to put documents. Heck, there are great big systems that only do that, document management. Drop the resume into the document management system and set the rule to blow it away after the duration has expired. Nothing terribley exciting here.

    If you are a small company, drop it onto a disk and toss it into a box labeled $current_year. This is not rocket science.

    Companies being overloaded by this? Not likely unless they are so easily confused by managing documents, in which case should the company really be in the league of trying to get governement contracts?

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  10. This is quite simply solved. by John+Penix · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Buy a 100 gig hard drive
    2. Format it with random noise
    3. Give the random noise a PGP header
    4. If you're ever prosecuted for not keeping a copy of someone's resume, tell the prosecutor it's on this hard drive you've got, but you misplaced the encryption key.
    Remember, the burden of proof is on the prosecutor. He has to prove that your noise isn't encrypted resumes.
    --
    Someone named an OS for me.
    1. Re:This is quite simply solved. by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not in the UK.

      Sadly, in the UK, there is a law specific to encrypted data that places the burden of proof on you. If you forget the key to some encrypted data that the government decides it wants to read, you can go to jail.

      Fun huh?

  11. Well then ... by the+bluebrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll start sending out resumes for the position of "Resume Collector and Archiver - You Know You Need One(TM)". Anyone got a link to the relevant federal reglementation?

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  12. Resume by grub · · Score: 4, Funny

    Send this to your various levels of government. Query them later via a freedom of information action to ensure they've kept it on file.

    Osama bin Laden
    Cave 273-b northern Afghanistan

    Dear Imperialist Infidel,

    Please accept this resume for your files concerning any openings
    you may have.

    Recently I've become newsworthy because of several operations my
    Al Quaeda teams have carried our successfully. This demonstrates
    a proven ability to plan and carry out large scale operations.

    I think my years of experience in strategic planning and covert
    operations would be an asset to your firm.

    Yours very truly,

    Osama bin Laden
    --
    Trolling is a art,
  13. My company refuses to take unsolicited resumes... by jot445 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All mail is pre-screened. No applications or resumes are accepted without a corresponding and valid job number. Personnel accepts no unsolicted phone calls Postings always close within two weeks. It's really tough to get a job with the company because of these Federal regulations. Compliance is not an option.

    --
    The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  14. But that's against the law! by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    If the original post is correct, their junking of > 90% of the resumes is a violation of federal law.

    Microsoft, violating federal law? I'm shocked!

  15. Oh yes, it's very FUDdy. by Nurlman · · Score: 5, Informative

    The requirement at issue is found in the Equal Employment Oppoertunity Commission's regulations interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Title VII prohibits employers of 15 or more persons from discriminating on the basis of race, sex, national origin, religion, etc.

    The EEOC has issued regulations that interpret the law. Among those regulations are recommendations as to how long employers should retain various items of paperwork. The article stems from a misunderstanding as to the meaning of 29 C.F.R. s. 1602.14, which states:

    Any personnel or employment record made or kept by an employer (including but not necessarily limited to requests for reasonable accommodation, application forms submitted by applicants and other records having to do with hiring, promotion, demotion, transfer, lay-off or termination, rates of pay or other terms of compensation, and selection for training or apprenticeship) shall be preserved by the employer for a period of one year from the date of the making of the record or the personnel action involved, whichever occurs later.
    What the article fails to acknowledge is that the EEOC's regulations are nothing more than recommendations, and are neither specifically enforcible by the EEOC nor binding on the Courts. Note 29 C.F.R. s. 1602.12:
    The Commission has not adopted any requirement, generally applicable to employers, that records be made or kept.
    In other words, the article is pure FUD: the EEOC recommends that you keep applications and resumes for at least a year, but doing so is neither required nor something that you can be punished for. (As a matter of corporate policy, it makes sense to retain bona fide resumes for at least that long in case of litigation, but what is "smart" and what is "required by law" are often two very different things.)
  16. An excellent plan... by brooks_talley · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...just don't forget to make your resume a 2GB PDF file.

    Cheers
    -b

  17. resume spamming? by Spudley · · Score: 4, Funny


    They haven't even stopped yet, and we're talking about letting them resume spamming?! ...

    oh, wait... you meant "resumé", didn't you?

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  18. What about resume _viruses_ by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A number of viruses disguise themselves as resumes. Does this law also force companies to keep those? Do companies still have the right to disinfect these mails?