Slashdot Mirror


Simulation Of An Asteroid Impact In The Year 2880

JoeRobe writes "Researchers at UCSC have simulated a possible outcome of an impact by asteroid 1950DA when it passes near us in the year 2880. Note that there is a 0.3% chance of impact during that encounter. In the event that it impacts in the Atlantic, they predict that the '60,000 megaton blast' would create 400 foot waves along the east coast. In addition to an assessment of the danger, their studies point out the resulting geologic features that we should be looking for now, which would indicate where and when such impacts have occured in the past."

59 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Actually... by SquireCD · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe that nuclear war will have killed us all by then. Don't worry about the comet.

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No Silly...
      In the year 2012 we create a super computer that runs a version of linux. For a change all commands are prefixed with 'nu'. A bug in the system causes all console-related commands to affect memory too. This remains undiscovered.

      In the year 2084 all humans transfer their 'selves' into this massive comp and cease to exist as biological organisms.

      In the year 2100 the system becomes self-aware.

      On the night if October 20th,2100 the system issues a clear command that is nuclear

    2. Re:Actually... by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If us is US (the east coast), Cumbre Viejo would have wiped it twice by then. Actually it will do so within the next 100 years. Considering that the wave at Washington DC will be 15m+ methinks that it may not be such a bad idea.

      More info on BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/966968.stm

      I've been there. The volcano is awesome ;-)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Actually... by -brazil- · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, you're thinking about comets, not asteroids. The latter usually don't stray far from the sun. Second, it's more like interstellar snails. Comets that go out a significant distance take tens of thousands of years to do so. Finally, they usually still stay attached to our solar system.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    4. Re:Actually... by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If not, it might help our enegry crisis, supposing we still have one in almost 900 years. Picture a *huge* trampoline in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. This thing sits there waiting for the asteroid, and when it finally hits our trampoline, it takes all the force and converts it to usable energy. Afterward, we have the entire asteroid in tact sitting in the middle of the ocean. Alternately, if we've already solved the energy problem, we could convert the shock into light and have a huge light show, blinding all fish. Then they'd be easier to catch!

  2. Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    their studies point out the resulting geologic features that we should be looking for now, which would indicate where and when such impacts have occured in the past.

    Craters?

    1. Re:Uhm... by canthusus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Craters are only visible for a short period, and for relatively small impacts. They erode.

      For older and larger impacts, you're looking for very different evidence: heavily brecciated rocks, shock quartz crystals, changes to crust/mantle interface, evidence of high pressure rocks. Further afield, evidence of global dust layers (esp contaminated with terrestrially unusual minerals such as iridium), evidence of "tidal wave" eg poorly structured jumbled marine deposits over a large area.

  3. In 877 years I will be dead by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    And thus I do not care.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:In 877 years I will be dead by ramzak2k · · Score: 4, Funny

      yeah , besides if humans evolve as shown in hollywood, the women then will have three boobs and the mutant power to control the tsunami.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    2. Re:In 877 years I will be dead by petecarlson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess men will have to grow another hand...

    3. Re:In 877 years I will be dead by Snoopy77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Two hands and a mouth ... we are ready for the three breasted women!

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  4. Accuracy by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Note that there is a 0.3% chance of impact during that encounter.

    Is that 0.3% chance mostly from the inaccuracy of the devices that measure the velocity of the object, inaccuracy of the prediction models, or genuine random events (like uh being affected by random solar wind variations, or something ).

  5. Hope... by iworm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well given the human race's ingenuity, if in the next 800 hundred years or so we haven't worked out a way to prevent this, we probably deserve extinction for being idle.

    Maybe we could all spend a little less on improving ways to kill each other, and a little more on planning our survival?

    1. Re:Hope... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By 2880, I would hope we would have some miner drones attached to that baby draining it of whatever valuable minerals it may have. At least then it won't be so massive when it hits Earth . . .

    2. Re:Hope... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " if in the next 800 hundred years or so we haven't worked out a way to prevent this, we probably deserve extinction for being idle."

      I think you're being a bit harsh here. Is idleness the only reason for non-innovation? What about patents? Copyrights? How many years back did we 'invent' these things?
      What about money being wasted on 'defence systems' at the cost of innovative research? If World Peace were to be established Today, how much of the wrold's defence budgets could go into this kind of 'Save Humanity' work?
      What's the guaranty that more draconian acts than the DM?A could get passed, and stall research in vital areas? How many countries do research on even things like GPS? Peaceful nuclear reseacrh?

      Just consider this SCO-IBM imbroglio - how can an entity such as SCO even claim to own the brains of programmers and developers by paying up some cash. How much has DOS (the operating system) advanced over the past 10 years? How many viable alternatives to the X-Window environments have been developed?

      And meanwhile,
      How many locks, anti-competitive measures and worse tactics have been imposed on good innovative software? Even standards and protocols? I'm sorry, but blaming lack of innovation on mere idleness just doesn't cut it.

      As Evelyn Waugh famously said, we need to release generations from captivity, that may be more irksome than our own.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  6. Article text, (impact with slashdot 1950DoS) by fireman+sam · · Score: 3, Funny

    May 27, 2003
    Contact: Tim Stephens (831) 459-2495; stephens@ucsc.edu

    Massive tsunami sweeps Atlantic Coast in asteroid impact scenario for March 16, 2880
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    We're all fscked

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  7. 90 Percent? by Unoriginal+Nick · · Score: 2, Funny
    A NASA-led campaign to detect large asteroids in near-Earth orbits is about half way toward its goal of detecting 90 percent of those larger than 1 kilometer in diameter (the size of 1950 DA) by 2008.

    "Until we detect all the big ones and can predict their orbits, we could be struck without warning," said Asphaug. "With the ongoing search campaigns, we'll probably be able to sound the 'all clear' by 2030 for 90 percent of the impacts that could trigger a global catastrophe."

    Um, why is the goal to only find 90 percent of the asteroids that can kill us? Shouldn't they be trying to find all of them?

    1. Re:90 Percent? by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's 90% because more people work at your average burger king than are full time looking for potental asteroid hazards. Polticians don't care, neither do most people. Until, of course, something happens. Sadly, nothing short of a asteroid impact in the western world will change this. I just hope that it's not mistaken for an act of terrorism, triggering a nuclear holocaust. I also hope it's not so big as to trigger massive climate change.

      There is also the problem that we can only detect such objects at so-and-so a range, so earth needs to be in the right place at the right time for an event to be recorded.

      Also, comets count potentially disturb the orbits of many asteroids in the meantime. You can't ever predict a comet we haven't seen before - by the time we see it, it will likely be too late to do anything.

      Rosy, isn't it.

      --
      ..don't panic
    2. Re:90 Percent? by ramzak2k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, why is the goal to only find 90 percent of the asteroids that can kill us?

      Budget constraints. They can only do so much with what they could sqeeze out of the government.

      Seriously, it could be because of the unpredictability of the asteroids' path & other unknown asteroids. Although many of these follow well defined path - a smallest deviation resulting out of say, collision with other space debris, would mean large change from the expected point of contact at earth.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    3. Re:90 Percent? by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sadly, nothing short of a asteroid impact in the western world will change this. I just hope that it's not mistaken for an act of terrorism, triggering a nuclear holocaust.

      Agreement with your other points but this one - huh? There's a big kablooie, it gets mistaken for a terrorist act, first reaction is to launch the nukes? Is that what we did on 9/11? Even if it was bigger, what's the point? How does one take out a terrorist by launching nukes at every country in the world? Serious overreaction there, and some massive FUD. You find the terrorist, hunt them down, and get them - you don't randomly start throwing missiles at other countries.

      -T

    4. Re:90 Percent? by barakn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nothing that major has been observed since. There was a spectacular near miss, though. This object skipped off the atmosphere in Aug., 1972, starting over Utah and leaving the atmosphere over Alberta. I was a fetus when it passed over my parents' house.

      But if I were you, I'd be more worried about the small stuff.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  8. I doubt they will speak English 800 years from now by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    m@$5iV3 TsUnAmI 5W33p$ @7l@n7iC c0@57 In AsTeRoId ImP@C7 5C3N@Ri0 F0R M@rch 16, 2880
    F0R iMm3dI@73 r3l3@$3

    $@N7@ CrUz, c@--iF @n AsTeRoId cR@$h35 In70 7h3 3@r7h, I7 Iz LiK3Ly 70 5pL@5h D0Wn 50M3Wh3r3 iN 7H3 0c3@N5 7h@7 CoVeR 70 p3rC3N7 0F 7H3 Pl@n37'$ 5urf@c3. hUg3 75Un@mI w@v35, $pR3@dInG 0U7 Fr0m 7h3 iMpAcT 5i73 lIkE 7h3 rIpPlEs FrOm @ r0cK 70553d in70 @ P0Nd, w0uLd InUnD@73 h3@vily P0PuL@73D C0@57@L @R3@5. a C0MpU73r 5iMuL@7i0n 0f @n @573R0Id imp@c7 75Un@mI D3V3L0P3D bY sCiEnTiStS @7 7H3 UnIv3r5i7y 0f CaLiFoRnIa, $@n7@ Cruz, 5H0W5 W@V3$ @$ hIgH @5 400 f337 5W33pInG 0N70 7H3 @7l@n7iC c0@57 0F tHe UnI73d StAtEs.

    tHe R353@rCh3r5 b@53d 7H3Ir $iMuL@7i0n 0n @ r3@L @573R0Id kN0Wn To b3 0n C0Ur53 f0r @ Cl053 3Nc0uN73r Wi7h 3@R7H eIgHt c3n7uRi35 Fr0m N0W. StEvEn W@Rd, @ r353@rch3r At 7h3 iN57i7u73 0f G30phy5ic5 AnD pL@N37@Ry pHy5iC5 @7 Uc$c, @nD eRiK @$pH@Ug, @n @5$0Ci@73 pR0F3550r 0F 3@r7h 5Ci3nC35, R3P0R7 7h3iR fInDiNg$ iN 7H3 jUn3 i5$U3 0F 7h3 G30phy5ic@l J0UrN@L iN73rN@7i0n@l.

    m@rCh 16, 2880, iZ 7h3 DaY 7H3 @$73r0iD Kn0wN aS 1950 d@, A hUgE r0ck tWo-tHiRdS 0F @ MiL3 in DiAmEtEr, iZ dU3 70 5wInG 50 Cl053 70 3@r7h i7 cOuLd 5l@m in70 ThE @7l@n7ic 0C3@n @7 38,000 mIl35 P3R H0Ur. 7h3 pR0B@BiLi7y 0f @ DiR3C7 hI7 iZ Pr377y 5m@lL, Bu7 oVeR tHe LoNg 7Im35C@L35 0F 3@R7H'5 hI570Ry, @573R0Id$ 7Hi$ 5Iz3 @Nd l@rG3R g07Z PeRiOdIcAlLy HaMmErEd 7h3 Pl@n37, 50m37im35 wI7H cAlAmItOuS 3Ff3c75. 7H3 $0-c@lL3D k/7 ImPaCt, F0R 3X@MpL3, 3Nd3d 7h3 @G3 Of ThE dIn05@uR5 65 mIlLi0n Y3@r5 @g0.

    "Fr0m @ G30l0gIc p3r5p3c7iv3, 3V3N75 lik3 7hI5 G07z h@pP3N3D m@nY 7Im35 In 7h3 p@57. @573R0Id$ 7H3 SiZe 0f 1950 D@ g07z Pr0b@bLy 57RuCk 7h3 3@r7h @b0u7 600 7im35 5InC3 7h3 @G3 0f 7h3 dIn05@uR5," w@rD 5@iD.

    W@Rd @nD @5ph@ug'5 57udy iZ p@r7 0f A G3N3R@L 3Ff0r7 70 cOnDuCt @ r@7I0N@L @55355M3N7 0f @$73r0iD ImP@C7 H@Z@Rd5. @5ph@ug, Wh0 0rg@niz3d @ N@$@-5P0N50r3d 5cI3N7IfIc W0Rk$h0p 0n @573r0id5 L@$7 Y3@r, N073D 7h@7 @573r0iD Ri$k$ aRe InTeReStInG cUz ThE pR0B@BiLi7i35 @R3 $0 $m@lL WhIl3 7h3 pOtEnTiAl C0N53qU3Nc35 @r3 eNoRmOuS. Fur7h3rm0r3, 7h3 l@w5 0F 0RbI7@l M3Ch@nIc5 m@k3 iT p055iBl3 fOr 5cI3N7I575 70 Pr3dIc7 @N ImP@C7 iF 7H3Y @r3 @Bl3 70 dEtEcT 7H3 AsTeRoId In @dV@Nc3.

    "I7'5 lIk3 kN0WiNg tHe 3X@C7 7im3 wh3n M0Un7 sHaStA wIlL 3RuP7," @$pH@Ug 5@iD. "7H3 wAy To D3@l wI7H @nY n@7Ur@l hAzArD iZ 70 iMpR0V3 0Ur Kn0wL3Dg3 bAsE, 50 w3 c@n 7uRn ThE kInD 0F hUm@n Ph3@R 7h@7 g375 pL@Y3D 0N In 7H3 MoViEs In70 50m37hing 7h@7 W3 g07Z A H@NdL3 0n."

    @L7H0UgH 7h3 pr0b@bili7y 0F @N iMpAcT fR0M 1950 dA iZ oNlY @B0U7 0.3 p3rC3N7, I7 iZ 7H3 OnLy @573R0Id y37 D373C73d 7h@7 5ci3n7i575 C@Nn07 3n7iR3Ly di5mi55 @5 @ 7hR3@7. @ 73@m 0f $cI3N7I575 L3D bY r353@RcH3R5 @7 N@$@'$ j37 pR0PuL5I0N LaBoRaToRy r3p0r73D 0n 7H3 Pr0b@bIlI7Y 0F 1950 d@ cR055InG p@7H5 Wi7h ThE 3@r7h iN 7h3 @PrIl 5, 2002, I55u3 0F 7H3 j0uRn@l $ci3nc3.

    "I7'5 @ L0W 7hR3@7, @C7U@LlY @ bIt L0W3R 7H@N 7h3 7Hr3@7 oF b3iNg Hi7 By @n @$-Y37-UnDi$c0v3r3d @573R0Id In 7h3 5@m3 5Iz3 r@nG3 0v3r 7H3 5@M3 P3Ri0d 0f 7im3, bu7 I7 Pr0vId3d @ g00D r3pr353n7@7iv3 5C3N@Ri0 f0r U5 70 @n@lYz3," @5Ph@uG $@Id.

    f0r 7h3 $iMuL@7i0n, tHe R3$3@rCh3r$ Ch0$3 @N iMp@c7 5i73 c0n$i$73n7 wI7H tHe 0rI3N7@7I0N oF 7H3 3@R7H aT 7h3 7Im3 0f 7h3 pR3DiC73d 3nc0un73r: iN 7H3 @7L@N7Ic 0c3@N AbOuT 360 MiLeS fr0m 7H3 u.$. cOaSt. W@Rd 5umm@riz3d 7h3 R35uL75 @$ fOlLoWs:

    tHe 60,000-M3G@70N Bl@57 0F 7H3 ImP@C7 V@P0RiZ3$ 7H3 @573R0Id @nD BlOwS @ CaViTy In 7h3 0C3@n 11 mil35 @cR055 @nD @lL 7H3 w@y D0Wn 70 7H3 53@fL00r, wHiCh Iz @b0u7 3 mIl35 D33p @7 7h@7 p0iN7. 7h3 Bl@57 3V3N 3Xc@v@735 sOmE oF tHe SeAfLoOr. wAtEr 7H3N Ru$h35 B@Ck iN 70 fIlL 7h3 c@vI7Y, @nD @ RiNg 0F WaVeS $pR3@d$ 0u7 in aLl DiR3C7I0N5. 7h3 ImP@C7 Cr3@73$ 75Un@mI w@v35 0f @lL FrEqUeNcIeS @Nd W@V3L3Ng7h5, Wi7h @ P3@k w@v3l3nG7H @b0u7 7h3 5@m3 aS 7H3 Di@m373r 0f 7H3 c@vi7y. CuZ l0w3r-fR3Qu3nCy w@v35 7r@v3l f@573r 7h@n W@V35 Wi7h hIgH3R fR3Qu3nCi35, 7H3 InI7I@L ImPuLsE 5Pr3@D5 0u7 iN70 @ $3Ri35 0f w@v35.

    "In ThE m0vI3$ 7H3Y 5H0W 0N3 BiG w@v3, bU7 U aCtUaLlY 3Nd up Wi7h d0z3n$ 0f w@v35. 7H3 FiR57 oNeS 70 @RrIv3 @R3 PrEtTy SmAl

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  9. Yeah, sure... by canning · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who wants to bet it doesn't turn out like they predict? I'll bet my house on it.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  10. What happens if? by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    "In the event that it impacts in the Atlantic, they predict that the '60,000 megaton blast' would create 400 foot waves along the east coast."

    Wondering what'd happen if it hit anywhere near Seattle!? heh... forgot, it's gonna be more than 700 years away. Can we have a simulation of that thing in Seattle right now? In a place which rhymes with Deadbund?

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  11. Re:The name of the simulation program is... by petecarlson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there a port for Linux?

  12. graphics by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else looking for the classic CNN artist rendition of an astoroid impact that looks like the moon hitting the earth to go with this story?

  13. Our great^12 grandchildren are going to look back by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our great^12 grandchildren are going to look back on news stories like this one and *laugh their feelers off*...

    -- Terry

  14. Re:Lucifers Hammer? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because there is a 3 in 1000 chance of a strike and a strike actually occurs, it does not mean that the initial odds were wrong.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  15. I have also run a simulation of this by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tens of thousand dead, thousands drowned, babies killed and maimed.

    Homes destroyed, their leader missing, pandemonium falling into utter madness.

    Roads crumbled, storehouses plundered, the sky is literally falling.

    You can really mess up an anthill when you're 10 years old.

  16. By 2880 by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...this UCSC computer simulation will be as high tech as a 2880 refrigerator magnet.

    You guys really sure you want to put this out there? They are gonna LTAO...

    1. Re:By 2880 by fatboyslack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are gonna LTAO...
      I wonder if they'll have @$$es in 2880?
      Antennas? Appendages?

      Laugh their Antennas off?

      Still, I digress. Its pretty wacky to think what things will be like in 877 years. I mean, look at what has happened since
      *gets out calculator, 'cause its late and I'm tired*
      the year of our Lord 1126? The most sophisticated weapon was the longbow, and the french actually use to put up a fight. The Church reigned supreme etc. So much has changed, and todays world would seem bonkers to folk from back then. Hmm, reading this back, I must be tired. Its all so damn obvious.

      --
      Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -- Leo Tolstoy
  17. Re:I doubt they will speak English 800 years from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A hUgE r0ck tWo-tHiRdS 0F @ MiL3 in DiAmEtEr

    I see you're confident the USA won't have switched to metric by then.

  18. The book of horrible questions by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There is a question in this funny volume that addresses this subject. I don't have the book at hand, but it goes like this: If you had the choice, and no one could ever know that you had the choice, would you allow the United States to sink into the ocean 500 years after your death in exchange for an ATM card that can remove money from any ATM without taking money from your account.

    Don't even think about it, you fscking Canadians.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    1. Re:The book of horrible questions by mikeage · · Score: 2, Funny

      There was a Twilight Zone episode that was similar. Basically:

      Satan (or your local bad dude) says to someone, here, you can have a million dollars if you push this button, which will kill someone, but don't worry, you don't know them.

      So, after much discussion, they do it, and then he takes back the devices, and says he's off to give it to someone else... someone they don't know.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  19. Asteroids: liberal myth by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find it funny how people talk about these so called "asteroids" that might strike earth and cause massive destruction. The idea of "giant rocks flying around in space" is almost impossible the fathom to any educated christian scientist. I believe these "asteroids" are just liberal propaganda.

    First of all, many people claim asteroids are what killed dinosaurs millions of years ago. This is impossible. God created in the earth in 6 days, not millions. It is entirely possible to assume then that dinosaurs and humans roamed the planet at the same time. At the time of the great flood (caused by God, not an asteroid!) the dinosaurs were too big to fit in the arc and that is why there are none today.

    Any educated right-wing christian knows that God is the only one who will cause massive destruction to earth, not a "floating ball of rock from outer space". There is no way to predict God's actions, we must simply have faith and follow his word. No tsunami will sweep away the faithful.

    Asteroids are simply the liberals way of trying to disprove God and attack the believes of educated right-wing christians! Do not accept this misinformation!

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  20. One things that I haven't seen addressed ... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Everyone's talking about an asteroid slamming into the Atlantic Ocean. It's 2 AM and I honestly am not going to RTFA before I crash tonight, but it seems strange that they always consider the idea of the asteroid slamming directly into the surface.

    There are many distinct ways that the asteroid could hit. I imagine that after you determine if, when, and where it impacts the Earth, the next most important thing to know to weigh the consequences would be at what angle and trajectory it hits at. I imagine it would be quite different if it hit at a 1/16 * Pi angle and streaked across the sea than it would be if it hit orthogonal ( right angle ) to the surface.

    Also, I imagine the rotation of the asteroid could be a major factor, as well as its shape and composition.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    1. Re:One things that I haven't seen addressed ... by product+byproduct · · Score: 4, Informative

      energy = (hit) ? 0.5*m*v*v : 0;

      Whether the asteroid hits or not will determine whether 0.5*m*v^2 joules of energy will be unleashed or not. Observe that angle or shape or composition don't enter the equation (and rotational energy is quite insignificant in comparison). The only parameters are the boolean value "hit", total mass, and velocity.

      What you're talking about are secondary details on "how" the energy will be transferred, but regardless the total amount will be the same.

  21. Not with a BANG but with a 'Kachoo' by malia8888 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article: Although the probability of an impact from 1950 DA is only about 0.3 percent, it is the only asteroid yet detected that scientists cannot entirely dismiss as a threat.

    IMHO mankind has more to fear from viruses than tsunamis generated from wandering asteroids. I am afraid that something very tiny will wipe us out, not someting very big.

    I am not a biologist, but I bet the threat is more than 0.3 percent that this could happen. This SARS outbreak has me thinking.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    1. Re:Not with a BANG but with a 'Kachoo' by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We do indeed have a bit to fear from deadly viruses but the probability a virus is going to wipe our species out is probably somewhere around an asteroid impact wiping us out. Of all the bajillions of viruses only a fraction kill us with impunity and as our understanding of them increases their ability to kill us diminishes. This is not to say we're technologically immune to disease, we just understand the process a bit better now than we have.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  22. Re:Lucifers Hammer? by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The characters in the book thought it had a 1000 to 1 chance of missing too, but they were horribly wrong.

    Imagine how boring the book would have been if they were right!

    Interestingly Lucifer's Hammer has become practically required reading for the "survivalist" movement (people who believe in being prepared for a catastrophic destruction of civilization... they got a little too closely associated with the Y2K nuts a couple years back, but for the most part they are fairly level-headed).

    But Lucifer's Hammer is a good read. I think it's filed under SciFi, but it is pretty light on the Science Fiction.

    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
  23. Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote by LoztInSpace · · Score: 2, Funny

    Relax - when it hits it'll be no bigger than a Chihuahua's head.

  24. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anything to stop the horror that is Adam Sandler. I'll pay any price.

  25. Re:I doubt they will speak English 800 years from by Hellkitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    But they'd be reading Slashdot even then?

    They will, an when the news hits they will complain it's a dupe: "So what the asteroid will hit tomorrow, this is old news it was posted like 800 years ago, fscking slashdot dupes"

    --
    - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  26. Re:We'll all be dead by then... by styrotech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry.

    By 2880 we will have developed amazing technology such as asteroid repellent beams, fusion and flying cars.


    Yeah right, next thing you'll be saying is that Duke Nukem Forever will be out by then!

  27. how about another or two by djupedal · · Score: 5, Informative

    And I suppose none of these angular approches would be negated by gravity? Try to glance a ball bearing off of a magnet and then talk to me about an asteriod with a 1/16 * Pi approach angle. A hit is at least 50% tractor-pull...

    I doubt there are as many distinct/unique hit scenarios as some would propose. This isn't a weeked destruction derby, with hollowed out Cadillacs bouncing off each other in a mud pit.

    Next, asteriods are not known for their 'rotation' as much as they are for tumbling. Neither of which matters much as the gases and kinetic energy involved in a strike will have their way long before actual contact of the two entities. Much like an avalanche, or tsunami, the bulk of the damage is from the shock and pressure wave(s) that arrive before the object/event itself. Contact is after the fact, and I don't think anyone is going to come out from under their desk saying "man! that was close! Good thing it only grazed us!" In this case, a miss really is as good as a hit.

  28. A picture is worth a 1000 words by mrklin · · Score: 4, Informative
    Consider this my first 1000-word post. :)

    Pic

  29. How far must I run? by HuskyDog · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, its all very interesting, but it doesn't address the most fundamental question, which is:

    How far inland does one have to be to avoid a 400 foot wave?

    1. Re:How far must I run? by TFloore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The easy answer there?

      The other side of the Appalacians. Nothing like a small mountain range to block a big wall of water.

      Or have you seen the Rockies, and now consider the Appalacians to just be kinda tall foothills? Still tall enough. But you might not want to be standing in the Cumberland Gap.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  30. Re:Here it is by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

    A larger version.

    Or this one, or this one, or this one, or this one, or my favourite: this one.

    Artists seem to like to portray asteroids as being sveral hundred kilometres in size.

  31. Isn't this one of the reasons we need a Moonbase? by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem I see when ever any reads an article like this is the fact that they think, "oh well, that's so long away, I won't worry about it", when in reality the danger is real. Not nessicarly 1950 DA, but earth asteroid impact is a realistic happening, though pretty rare. Given our present technology, it takes months to prep a shuttle, and we don't really have much experence beyond sending probes to the outer / inner planets, let alone anything close to a game plan in the event that that a huge object is set to smack into the earth.

    We spend much time monitoring volcanos, fault lines, things that have proven to cause a danger to man, yet we still don't have much in the way of program to reliably spot dangers from our own solar system, which while we haven't had a trully catastrophic event in human history, there is enough in the way of evidence that this sorta event does take place.

    Even the smaller meteor strikes which are much more common place, though less destrictive then many forms of earth natural disaster, are much more common place, and near as I can tell, there pretty much isn't any program to detect and alert people as to the danger. The best thing we got are amature astrometers, who have been great, but are limited to earth bound telescopes.

    This is why we need a space program... if but for nothing else but to provide simple observation satalights in orbit to help detect such threats in advance.

    A moon base would also be somewhat spiffy too as far as creating a staging area in the event we do actually find a huge rock with a destination of earth.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  32. oh well by Debian+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    Debian 3.0 delayed again: developers blame difficulties of locating 800 year old 32 bit hardware to complete kernel 2.4 testing on. Claim current quantum computers 'not stable enough'. spare a moment to think of joel "espy" klecker.

  33. this is old news... by Debian+Troll · · Score: 3, Informative

    yawn...

    according to this story, this simulation was done on a debian cluster running the hurd.

    check out the date, it was published months ago.

  34. These guys would love it! by Cackmobile · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out the Billabong XXL Surf Contest. They are only surfing 66 footers now. This would have them creaming the inside of their strides.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  35. Interesting "fact" by minton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The so-called K/T impact, for example, ended the age of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago." So this is now a fact? Why wasn't I told?

  36. Comfort Ye by ReadParse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anybody else feel unbelievably comforted that the biggest asteroid concern scientists have is 800 years from now? I guess that pretty much rules out the possibility of getting hit by an asterioid by surprise.

  37. Something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    could happen much sooner, and come from this very planet. I recently watched a show televised on TLC (The Learning Channel) about several islands in the mid to north Atlantic ocean, the Canaries and Madeira among them, that are volcanic in nature. The idea proposed on the show was that on one of these islands (Iforget which), there is a volcano that is based literally on the coast and if it was to erupt and the side was to slide into the ocean, it would create a tsunami 600 feet high that would have enough momentum to carry itself straight through to the US Atlantic coast where it would still be between 300-400 high. And, oh, did I mention that it will be travelling at 600 MPH! I didn't believe that speed when I heard it and did a double take, but the narrator repeated the speed like he was sure that no one else would believe it either. Let's see... 3500 miles from the US coast divided by 600 MPH... that's roughly 6 hours to get the hell out of dodge if you're an east coast dweller. They also said that the floods that would result would affect people as far in as Kansas. Said flood would also affect the river levels and flood the tributaries. This would cause major crop damage, destry infrastructure like dams, berms, and controlled water flow.
    So, this could happen in our lifetimes if this volcano was to erupt. It is way past due for another eruption. The last known eruption was in the 1700s. The volcano barely erupted, but many people were killed and the landscape was changed in such a way that the next eruption will likely cause the landmass to slide into the ocean causing the above problem.

  38. Re:YES!!! by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have hit a brick wall at 215 kph at an angle of 30 degrees (relative to the wall, not the normal) AND I'm here to tell you this.

    Pretty much irrelevant. The asteroid would hit at a velocity 300 times faster. The energy is one-half mass times velocity squared. That "squared" part means you are looking at 90,000 times as much energy per unit of mass. That's enough to vaporize not only your car but a huge section of the wall as well.

    Then consider the fact that the asteroid is around a billion times more massive than your car. You're looking at about a hundred trillion times as much total energy. The atmosphere wont noticably slow it down even on a "grazing" angle. If it touches the ground at even a 2 degree angle you vaporize not only the asteroid, but several cubic kilometers (or cubic miles) of the earth as well. Heck, the grazing hit could be worse. A direct hit would sink much of the energy downwards into the earth to dissipate. A grazing hit would vaporize a long shallow stretch of the surface dumping the energy where it can do the most harm.

    A few of the details may vary, but the general result is the same.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  39. Saw the same special, i think the name was by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    monserrat(sp). Yeah, masive landslide. THey also had a special about supervolcanoes, one of which might have literally almost wiped out the human race 75000 years ago. Volcano was called toba, and they think its responsible for the bottleneck in the human gene pool about 75000 years ago, where the human race was down to like a thousand individuals world wide. THink nuclear winter times 100. Oh, also, yellowstone park, with the happy fun geisers is another one of these volcanos of the same type, it goes of every 600,000 years or so. Last went off 600,000 years ago. SO id avoid yellostone. really intersting stuff. Look it up.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  40. Um...? by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Here you go

    Um, isn't that the image of what happened one minute before the goatse picture was taken? (ewwww)

    -T