Slashdot Mirror


Senator Pushes Bill To Limit Anti-Copying Schemes

Brushfireb writes "Republican Sen. Sam Brownback is pushing a bill that will limit the ability of record labels, movie studios and others to use anticopying technology on their products. Most notably, this is important because it states that people will be able to resell their used DVDs, along with putting a concrete limit on this behavior of DRM/anticopying schemes by the RIAA and MPAA."

19 of 450 comments (clear)

  1. BSD is Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is growing

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Windows community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has risen yet again, now up to more than 30 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has gained more market share , this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is sending other OSes into complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by topping the charts in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Daemon to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a long and prosperous future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Windows Server because *BSD is growing. Things are looking very good for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to gain market share. Red ink flows from Redmond like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most loved of them all, having gained 93% more core developers. The sudden and pleasant release of the long developed 5.0 only serves to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is growing.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 70000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 70000/5 = 14000 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 7000 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (70000+14000+7000)*4 = 364000 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the release of OSX, cool new technologies and so on, FreeBSD is expanding into more desktops than ever. FreeBSD has become more than the sum of its parts.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily gained in market share. *BSD is very powerful and its long term survival prospects are very bright. If Windows is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to improve. The progress achieved is nothing short of a miracle. For all practical purposes, *BSD is alive and kicking.

    Fact: *BSD will kick your ass

  2. Re:6 Days of Testing? by bmah · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scott is trying a slightly different model for 5.1. You might have seen where we did two BETA releases earlier in May. These occupy the same places on the schedule that the first two RC snapshots did on some other releases. The idea is that the thing called 5.1-RC1 should be really really really close to what we'd ship for the release, with almost all of the bugs (that we're able to catch anyways) ironed out during 5.1-BETA1 and 5.1-BETA2. Also, 5.1-RC1 was/is released from the CVS branch to be used for the release.

    Most of the process changes affect only committers (I think)...I'd expect that the only changes visible to most users would be the names of the snapshots.

  3. protecting the right of consumers by fozzy(pro) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Elected Offical trying to protect consumers as opposed to corp. rights. what a nice idea

    1. Re:protecting the right of consumers by evilviper · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe there are about 5 of them in the Senate...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:protecting the right of consumers by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't understand, who gave him money ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    3. Re:protecting the right of consumers by gandy909 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know it is an extreme longshot, but maybe the wacky FCC decision has finally woken at least some of them up. I was watching the Senate hearing yesterday and almost every Senator on the panel was completely against their decision and made it plainly known, although naturally the Democrats were somewhat harder on them.

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
  4. Nice by DreadSpoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What groups are lobbying for this stuff? I can't imagine a politician pushing for stuff like this without someone with money lobbying for it.

    After all, these days, politicians care more about compaign money than actually pleasing the people who do the real voting; enough compaign money, it doesn't matter how much of a bastard you are. ~,^

    Seriously, tho, who are the backers of this bill?

    1. Re:Nice by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe Verizon and At&T? They are companies that have an interest in not being bugged by the *AA everytime attempts to download a file off the internet.

      Everyone makes a big deal about about how powerful the *AA are, well they are sticking alot of burdens on other companies to support their business model, it is only a matter of time before someone is going to strike back.

  5. and in other news by toddhunter · · Score: 5, Funny

    The same senator is trying to push through a bill demanding that hell freezes over sometime in the near future. Sources say he has much more chance with the second one.

  6. A congress of compromises by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, our congress has been known to pass bills that sound strong but are actually crippled. I am wondering how this bill will be crippled in conference comittee if passed. Hopefully the EFF's lobby can at least moderate the MPAA/RIAA lobbying machine.

    I applaud the congressman for taking such a bold step. I guess it is time for the all of us to get out a pen and write some letters of support. Can everyone please write in support of this? We all know that email is mostly ignored, while they actually have to carry the weight of our letters.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  7. Re:what do you want, your job or the bling bling.. by benna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this bill may actually be his more creative way of saying he will not run for another term.

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  8. It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's about time for the Republicans to wake up and realize that they have so few friends in Hollywood that a scorched-earth policy on the entertainment industry is in order. It would be sweet to see the left coast starved of money.

  9. Excellent news! by Wellspring · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is extremely good news....

    It's also our big chance. Take the time to write a polite letter, encouraging your Senators and Congressman to support this bill. Then print it out, sign it and MAIL it (that's right, snail mail!).

    Things are still very early. There's plenty of time for it to die in committee, or be riddled with amendments (some irrelevant, some helpful, some counterproductive). Your job, if you care, is to express your support for this bill-- and those who support it.

    If you're from Kansas, you should be especially supportive of Senator Brownback's position in this-- even if you disagree with him on other issues, you should take the time to publicly agree with him on IP reform.

    This is a great first step. We need to remember that it isn't the only step, and there's work in here for us to do, too.

  10. Free Karma for reading the article. by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Informative

    Forget DRM, the most important thing in this bill : requiring a judge's authorization to use the DMCA to shut down a website.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  11. Re:I may actually have to switch parties by Arandir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you surprised? When the term "Hollywood liberal" refers to members and associates of the MPAA and RIAA, and the "D" before many congressmen's names refers to "Disney", I don't particularly perceive the Democrat party as one championing my rights to listen to the music I have purchased.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  12. Protecting the right of Private Citizens by c0dedude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but is he? Is there an IMMINENT, PRESSING NEED for this law? Isn't there just a need for a warning label? I guess what I'm saying is that we should consider whether we should allow the government to just take away the right to copy-protect CD's without an imminent need. I mean, just becuase it can be done doesn't mean it should be done. I, for one, think that the US was not created to take away liberties without societal need, and here there's no need past a warning label to the extent of "this cd can't be copied. don't buy it" or some such. Allowing the government to take away rights just because it's popular is dangerous. See DMCA, Patriot Act. And it's expensive. Consider the small record label that wants to copy-protect its CD's, but can't afford a lawyer to appear before a judge. This isn't fair. There's no reason the government should regulate this beyond a label, the forces of the market should handle this.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Protecting the right of Private Citizens by aborchers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have a good point. I am not for wanton and unnecessary expansion of the law. A perfect example in this context is DMCA, which criminalizes technology when copyright law already exists to prosecute criminals.

      However, copy protection limits fair-use rights that are explicit in the US Code and are upheld by such case law as the Sony Betamax case and the failed attempt to shutdown Diamond Rio. For that reason, it is not so far out to stop companies from employing technological protections that impede the already enumerated rights of consumers, no?

      Come to think of it, I'm curious why noone has yet argued the case that copyright protection technologies themselves are already illegal because they impede fair use.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
  13. This guy is great! by marekbrz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm from Kansas, and I actually voted for Brownback. He's a great guy...I recently send an email to all the politicans from Kansas regarding the Patriot Act. Brownback was the first one to respond...a few hours after I sent the email. He also followed up with a letter in the mail. I'm not suprised that he is pushing for this legislation.

  14. Re:Law is not the solution by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh yes it is. Crack that proection and face 20 years in jail. Doesn't matter how legit your purpose is. Murder in the 1st degree often results in similar jail time, though there is no assurance that they won't be released for good behavier in 5-10 years.

    So... what is this telling our kids?

    *****DON'T COPY THAT DISK*****
    -*-*-KILL SOMEONE, YOU'LL SERVE LESS TIME-*-*-

    ---Murder, the choice for a new generation

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.