Slashdot Mirror
SAPAC Unveils New Australian Supercomputer
Sean Burford writes "The South Australian Partnership for Advanced Computing (SAPAC) has unveiled its new AU$1.7 Million supercomputer
named Hydra. It is an IBM 1350 Linux cluster with 126 compute nodes (xSeries 335), 1 head node (xSeries 335), 1 storage
node (xSeries 345) and 1 managment node (xSeries 345). Hydra has a peak theoretical performance of 1.2 Teraflops, and has currently benchmarked at 682 Gigaflops. The current benchmark
places it in the fastest three supercomputers in Australia and equivalent to the current number 80 in the world.
The cluster has a total of
258 2.4Ghz Intel Xeon processors and 258GB of RAM. SAPAC expects to achieve a benchmark closer to 700 Gigaflops with further tuning. Hydra is hosted at The University Of Adelaide, who already host a
40 node cluster of Sun e420 machines."
Imagine a beowulf cluster of these! /me ducks :P
I apologize sincerely
This is nice, but it's in Adelaide, South Australia. The same state that was first to decide that uploading adult content to the Internet, by FILM STANDARDS, is a jailable offense. Ie, upload a Mills and Boon-style book, go to jail.
E420?
What is everyone smoking? Oh! Ok!
Jews really suck? I mean, obviosly there is this Israel/Palistine shit, but did you notice that they own American media? They spend more lobbying the US government than any other ethnic group - and, although they were given the gift of a homeland from a mis-guided Harry Truman, they still are ungrateful? What is it that makes a group of people so arrogant, selfish and uncompromising? Now, I know that not all Jews suck, but the loudest ones sure do. Is there a Jew out there that can possibly shed some light on these "stereotypes" that tend to ring true over and over again?
Check these out
It still can't pass the turing test.
Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
the inherint flaw is that you are assuming a slashdotter can get a date. Further more, you assume that what dates they can get are desirable for sexual relations... ewwwwww
YOU SUCK BALLS!
Show me the sheep dip, mate!!!
; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
Way too much work. Just knock her ass out with some GHB in her drink.
Second Bruce: G'day, Bruce!
... Rule Six. Rule Seven,
First Bruce: Oh, Hello Bruce!
Third Bruce: How are you Bruce?
First Bruce: A bit crook, Bruce.
Second Bruce: Where's Bruce?
First Bruce: He's not 'ere, Bruce.
Third Bruce: Blimey, it's hot in here, Bruce.
First Bruce: Hot enough to boil a monkey's bum!
Second Bruce: That's a strange expression, Bruce.
First Bruce: Well Bruce, I heard the Prime Minister use it. "It's hot enough to boil a monkey's bum in here, your Majesty," he said and she smiled quietly to herself.
Third Bruce: She's a good Sheila Bruce, and not at all stuck up.
Second Bruce: Here! Here's the boss-fellow now! - how are you bruce? (Enter fourth Bruce with English person, Michael)
Fourth Bruce: 'Ow are you, Bruce?
First Bruce: G'day Bruce!
Fourth Bruce: Bruce.
Second Bruce: Hello Bruce.
Fourth Bruce: Bruce.
Third Bruce: How are you, Bruce?
Fourth Bruce: G'day Bruce.
Fourth Bruce: Gentleman, I'd like to introduce man from Pommeyland who is joinin' us this year in the philosophy department at the University of Woolloomooloo.
Everybruce: G'day!
Michael: Hello.
Fourth Bruce: Michael Baldwin, Bruce. Michael Baldwin, Bruce. Michael Baldwin, Bruce.
First Bruce: Is your name not Bruce?
Michael: No, it's Michael.
Second Bruce: That's going to cause a little confusion.
Third Bruce: Mind if we call you "Bruce" to keep it clear?
Fourth Bruce: Gentlemen, I think we better start the faculty meeting. Before we start, though, I'd like to ask the padre for a prayer.
First Bruce: Oh Lord, we beseech Thee, Amen!!
Everybruce: Amen!
Fourth Bruce: Crack tubes! (Sound of cans opening) Now I call upon Bruce to officially welcome Mr. Baldwin to the philosophy faculty.
Second Bruce: I'd like to welcome the pommy bastard to God's own Earth, and remind him that we don't like stuck-up sticky-beaks here.
Everybruce: Hear, hear! Well spoken, Bruce!
Fourth Bruce: Bruce here teaches classical philosophy, Bruce there teaches Haegelian philosophy, and Bruce here teaches logical positivism. And is also in charge of the sheep dip.
Third Bruce: What's New-Bruce going to teach?
Fourth Bruce: New-Bruce will be teaching political science, Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett, and Benaud.
Second Bruce: Those are all cricketers!
Fourth Bruce: Aww, spit!
Third Bruce: Hails of derisive laughter, Bruce!
Everybruce: Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, we love you amen!
Fourth Bruce:Bruce: Crack tube! (Sound of cans opening) Any questions?
Second Bruce: New-Bruce, are you a Poofter?
Fourth Bruce: Are you a Poofter?
Michael: No!
Fourth Bruce: No. Right, I just want to remind you of the faculty rules: Rule One!
Everybruce: No Poofters!
Fourth Bruce: Rule Two, no member of the faculty is to maltreat the Abbos in any way at all -- if there's anybody watching. Rule Three?
Everybruce: No Poofters!!
Fourth Bruce: Rule Four, now this term, I don't want to catch anybody not drinking. Rule Five,
Everybruce: No Poofters!
Fourth Bruce: Rule Six, there is NO
Everybruce: No Poofters!!
Fourth Bruce: Right, that concludes the readin' of the rules, Bruce.
First Bruce: This here's the wattle, the emblem of our land. You can stick it in a bottle, you can hold it in your hand.
Everybruce: Amen!
(NB: The Album versions continue with the Philosopher's song The TV version continues below....)
First Bruce: Right, let's get some Sheilas.
(An Aborigine bunts in with an enormous tray full of enormous steaks.)
Fourth Bruce: OK.
Second Bruce: Ah, elevenses.
Third Bruce: This should tide us over 'til lunchtime.
Second Bruce: Reckon so, Bruce.
First Bruce: Sydney Nolan! What's that! (points)
(Cut to dramatic close-up of Fourth Bruce's ear. Hold close-up. The superimposed arrow pointing t
-A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed-
But yeah, we do cook people.
[/completely offtopic]
Or your Hollywood talent, Paul Hogan. May he rest in peace.
In Soviet America the banks rob you!
it just provides a 230-year old ambiguously-worded law
It's not a "law". It's part of the fucking Constitution.
As for "ambiguously worded", what part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those! OMG LOLOLOL!!!!11!11
The world's 80th fastest computer was unveiled today. Well I keep submitting articles about the world's 1st worst broadband service, NZ Telecom Jetstream and they never get posted. I mean really now... the world's *80th* fastest and that's important enough to get posted? Slashdot just keeps getting better and more relevant by the day.
It's part of the fucking Constitution.
Its an Amendment to the Constitution. What do you think an "Amendment" means? Thats right, the Constitition can be changed and has been a fair few times.
What part of "Though shalt not kill" don't you understand?
>What part of "Though shalt not kill" don't you understand
Uh, the same part murderers don't understand you retard.
Replace murderers with any other form of criminal.
>a woman's cunt tenses up in a coma, and thus entry may be difficult.
Won't this be mitigated partially (at least!) by the generally "loose" (extraordinarily so) state of nearly all sub-~35-40yo cunts nowadays?
which part of "in time of war citizens have the right to pick up arms" needs further explanation?
People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
nnnnnn...
Unfortunately, it doesn't say that. It says: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." By mentioning both a "militia" and "the people" it becomes ambiguous.
It is not at all ambiguous. The proof is that it is well enough understood to form the basis of the definition of "militia" in the U.S. Code (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/311.html) as:
It goes on to say there are two classes of militia:
The "unorganized militia" is those of us who are not in a formal military unit.Therefore, what is being said in the 2nd Amendment is "to make certain we have a population that knows how to defend itself we need to ensure everyone has the opportunity to provide themselves with weapons and to develop the know-how to use them".
Interesting point, but this code is defining militia in terms of military law - cannot remove a perceived ambiguity from the Constitution.
Military law is separate from the U.S. Code which is civilian law.