Slashdot Mirror


Wired To Publish Slammer Source Code

Juan Carlos writes "Wired Magazine is going to publish the source code to the SQL Slammer worm in its next issue, due Tuesday, along with some kind of play-by-play of the worm's rapid spread. I actually think this is a neat idea for an article. But the fact is, the disassembly of Slammer (aka Sapphire) has been available on the Net since late January -- just hours after the worm started to spread."

7 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. fp!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    all lunix fagz need to head for teh slammar!!!111

    1. Re:fp!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      all lunix fagz need to head for teh slammar!!!111

      No, thats Mac loves that are teh GHEY. LUNIX fag0rz are asexual except when wanking to anime tentacle rap pr0n.

    2. Re:fp!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      a stupid story about morons who want to publish something old as taco's homo tendencies.
      how is that news ?

      oups... forgot I was on crapdot.

  2. more information by New+Account+Time · · Score: -1, Troll

    For more information, click here

  3. Is it really a good idea to do this? by Rush+Limbaugh · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'll probably be modded down as a troll, but I feel it necessary to bring up this point. Feel free to disagree and point out something I'm not seeing here. While I understand it makes for an interesting article, I'm not sure it's a good idea to post the code of a worm or other virus. The reason is that it only makes it easier for other people who want to write similar viruses. You may say that anyone could figure out how to write a virus, anyway. While that might be true, by making the source to these worms freely available, you're putting the information out there more. If I was the editor of Wired, I'd have some serious troubles with publishing this. I understand that there's a freedom of speech and there's nothing that can actually prevent them from publishing this. But is there really anything good that can come from further disseminating the source code of a worm? It's possible, but unlikely. Just my two cents.

  4. Re:You can picture it now.... by TrollBurger · · Score: -1, Troll

    loloszlolzoololo, dat is ab00t sas funney as a UsrFreindly cartoon. and dey ar funnehy two!!

  5. Re:But that doesn't mean... by bn557 · · Score: -1, Troll

    you know, I think you inadvertantly made a good point. does wired have the rights to publish this code? I'm not sure where assembly code or disassembled code would fall as far as this goes.

    Pat

    --
    Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable