Slashdot Mirror


Linux Rocket Blasts Off This Fall

HardcoreGamer writes "An Oregon amateur rocket group, the Portland State Aerospace Society, plans to launch a Linux-powered rocket weighing 12 pounds to 55,000 feet at a speed of Mach 3 in September, Wired News reports. The rocket's onboard computer is an AMD 586 processor and a Jumptec MOPS/520 PC/104+ board along with a power supply, a PCMCIA card carrier for an 802.11b card to transmit data to the ground, and a carrier board for a 128-MB CompactFlash card for long-term storage. The flight computer runs a stripped-down version of Debian Linux, with the 2.4.20 Linux kernel. The group will present a paper (HTML | PDF ) on the use of free software in rocketry at Usenix 2003. The real question is whether their network card will survive 10 seconds at 15 Gs!"

33 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess this redefines the term "crash."

  2. NOT linux POWERED by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    plans to launch a Linux-powered rocket
    I like linux as much as the next geek, but it is not linux powered. Maybe linux guided, but I don't think that linux is acutally causing it to move...
    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
    1. Re:NOT linux POWERED by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, the rockets run off concentrated Geek (and therefore linux), a highly flammable substance, what with the high level of oil in the skin and all.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    2. Re:NOT linux POWERED by BWJones · · Score: 5, Funny

      So......wait. All those "Linux Powered" bumperstickers I've seen don't mean that the car is moving under the power of Linux? Awwww. And I thought Linux was really cool.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:NOT linux POWERED by bloxnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Read the fscking article man. The damned rocket system includes an AMD proc. What do you think is providing the heat for fuel combustion???

      Boot guidance system, wait 15 miutes, heat exhaust ignites fuel.

      Oh damn, your still right...it's an AMD powered rocket. Sad attempt at humor ruined...aborting!

    4. Re:NOT linux POWERED by YE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually I think the rocket is powered by Open Source. Every time someone releases some new source code, the rocket goes higher and higher.

      No, what you're thinking about is a hot air baloon.

    5. Re:NOT linux POWERED by jaavaaguru · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention the flames caused by Vi and EMACS.

  3. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you really want to have to pay royalties to SCO on your rocket? There are high-quality commercial embedded OS's without much clearly defined IP rights, and no such liability issues, and I think its a good idea to go with the Gartner recommendation and avoid the potential legal issues with Linux for the time being.

  4. 802.11b? by DarkAurora · · Score: 4, Interesting

    802.11b for data transmission to the ground? I know my 802.11b network doesn't have a range of 55,000 feet.

    1. Re:802.11b? by ktakki · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was wondering about that, too. But the site states that they're allowed to boost the power legally if it's operated by a licensed Ham radio operator (under FCC Part 97 rules).

      Cringely got something like 10Km with a Pringles can, so I expect someone with more of a clue can push that to 55,000'.

      k.

      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    2. Re:802.11b? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.computerworld.com/mobiletopics/mobile/s tory/0,10801,75830,00.html

      Someone's done a 72-mile link.

      The hard part is that you either have to track the rocket with a directional antenna, or try to make everything work with a non-directional antenna. The 72-mile link was from one fixed point to another using mid-size parabolic antennas.

    3. Re:802.11b? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cringely got something like 10Km with a Pringles can, so I expect someone with more of a clue can push that to 55,000'.

      I'm sorry, but whats a clue can and why is it better than pringles?

      ;) Thats how I read it the first time anyways...

    4. Re:802.11b? by HardcoreGamer · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's an explanation of how they intend to achieve this on the site, along with a link to a news release that cites the Swedish Space Corporation's success transmitting data over 310 kilometers using 802.11b.

  5. Establishing link at 55,000 feet? by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the real question is will the pringles can survive 15 g's for 10 seconds?

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  6. Software by fname · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, let's see how the software does; it's notoriously difficult to design rocket software.

    But, I gather the greatest stresses will be on the computer hardware, as 10 G's will put a meaningful load on the parts, not to mention vibrational loads. And rockets are difficult to begin with. Here's hoping it works.

    1. Re:Software by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      kernel_panic() : This is a one way trip ! Aaaaaaa !

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  7. Trouble? by Dumbush · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bush: linux can be use to launch rocket? The very thing that terrorist lacks? It's free and distributed widely on the Internet? We got a problem here Ashcroft: not only that, but its source code is not encrypted, anyone could store a copy in their compueter. Bush: Then I'm assuming that even if we EMP all the computers, the source might still be stored somewhere as a printed copy? Ashcroft: I'm afraid so. I always have a problem tainting uses of technology Bush: then let's ban printers as well, that will buy you sometime.

  8. I'm glad to see... by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that my design documents aren't the only ones that look like this.

  9. Slashdot powered! by LoztInSpace · · Score: 5, Funny

    MS are great. Linux is crap.
    Now simply ride the flames that come out the back of that.....

  10. Re:IANARS but... by AllenChristopher · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the longest time the software was written by hand from the metal up. You can't afford to have one bug in space code. It could cost half a billion dollars. Every routine was coded three different ways, and three systems ran separately. If they ever disagreed you knew you had a problem. So while you have an OS of sorts, it's the Shuttle OS, and nothing else. After all, there are a thousand assumptions that OS developers make that a space programmer has to choose him or herself. In Linux, the coder is always saying "this amount of precision is ok," but for a rocket the amount of precision needed is very well known, and incredibly demanding at all levels. For a hobbyist group, linux is one thing, but if you want to put something in geosynchronous orbit indefinitely...

  11. Will never fly... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As others have pointed out, it is not *linux* powered. But now thanks to Ashcroft and his straight man, bin Laden - anyone using model rocket fuel is considered a terrorist threat. So, not only is not linux powered, it probably won't be powered at all.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  12. Re:IANARS but... by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But as previously posted, what OS has been guiding rockets? Wind-SCO-s?

    Uhm, nope. You know there _are_ other OSs out there besides Windows and Linux. Sure, a post like that makes for good Karma, but for crying out loud, what is the exact value of your post?!

    I will tell you which OSs have been running stuff like this; real-time, embedded OSs, such as VxWorks, QNX and all the others. Until recently linux SUCKED ASS for real-time applications. I don't think even Torvalds would mind me saying so. It just wasn't designed that way. There have been major improvements lately, which are all very promissing, but for applications that really demand real-timeness, probably very few people (in their right frame of mind, no offense) would choose Linux.

  13. Re:IANARS but... by temojen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not only did Linux "Suck Ass" for doing hard realtime, most of the architectures that it runs on do as well. For tasks of this nature, unpredictabilities like cache misses can be deadly, so you want much of the critical control features to run on as simple an architecture as possible.

    PIC or MC68hc11 are good candidates, anything more complex than an 8080 probably isn't.

    If it's controlling thrust vectoring, control surfaces, or fuel valves, I sure wouldn't want an OS like Linux, Windows, HPUX, Solaris, etc with multitasking and/or VM.

  14. Humor Attempt of the Day. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aww c'mon, they've only Linux. Not as if installing Linux is rocket-science...

  15. from the HOWTO by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is an interesting excerpt from the HOWTO:

    ...

    During system installation, it's important to use the right networking packages, to cope with the slightly nonstandard hardware. At the bash prompt, type:

    % apt-get skynet

    ...

  16. Carmack et. al. @ ArmadilloAerospace .... by malakai · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... have been doing this for awhile. The PC104 stack in their VTVL rockets/crafts have always been linux kernels.

    He's also been using 802.11 for communications.

    His laptop control station is win32 though.

    ArmadilloAerospace

    -malakai

  17. I realize you are joking... by switched4OSX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (and it is funny, by the way), but this attitude is not far from the truth. I happen to be a member of Tripoli (one of the associations that governs high power rocketry) and we currently have a letter writing campaign going on. The government is trying to make it harder for us hobbyist to get engines over certain power ratings. I guess they fear someone using these engines to power guided rockets. This is kinda silly, as most terrorist have access to better weaponry, ie Stinger missles. Of course, the gov is also afraid that the terrorist do all there planning on the internet, too.

    1. Re:I realize you are joking... by bear_phillips · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about telling us how we can help?

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    2. Re:I realize you are joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.space-rockets.com/congress

  18. Why this rocket won't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First of all, the techs will spend 3 weeks just trying to install Linux. There won't be a single driver that's compatible, and the few that exist will be buggy. Each different tech will want a different version, one wants NASA-Linux, another wants Goddard-Linux, and they all will be uninstalling the previous install and secretly putting their own distibution on it. If they ever settle on one install, then they will discover there's no applications to run, except Windows versions. Finally they'll get fed up with it and just put OSX on.

  19. Re:Can we include HDD with illegal mp3s ? by dracocat · · Score: 5, Funny

    What would RIAA do if a satellite full of mp3s was launched with easy access for everybody?

    Easy, sue SCO, the owner of the patents for Linux for developing a platform that allowed such a satellite to be launched.

  20. Hope those guys have a good legal team ;p by chronos82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    NEWS JUST IN---->The RIAA has sued the makers of said rocket, as the 802.11b link could "techinically be used to share illegal files accross the network".

  21. Mach 3 by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
    . . . a speed of Mach 3 . . . The rocket's onboard computer is an AMD 586 processor . . .

    Finally, somebody gets an AMD to run at a high speed.