Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Intel Shipped 1 Billionth Computer Chip

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the thats-a-lotta-silicon dept.

murat submitted linkage to a simple little story that proclaims that Intel has recently shipped it's One Billionth Chip. Quite an impressive accomplishment... it took them 25 years to reach the billions, but they estimate that they will hit 2 billion by only 2007.

7 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The article never really said it... by temojen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Probably a microcontroller. Most of the manufacturers make way more of those than any other type.

  2. AMD Helped Intel with Sales by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AMD gave them a run during the 1GHz era but Intel is now ahead of the competition. I'm sure that the competition helped Intel reach this billion mark faster than it would have without competition. AMD with its once faster and cheaper chips helped lower the prices of Intel chips.
    Competition is good for the consumer. Let's see what happens with Intel's prices now that there're on top.

    --
    --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
    1. Re:AMD Helped Intel with Sales by toddestan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, while Intel does have a firm hold of the high end chips, AMD is still killing them in the lower end chips. If you want the fastest computer around, get Intel. But for everyone else, who is looking for the biggest bang for their buck, is buying AMD.

  3. Re:AMD effect ... by tempmpi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They had already hit the 2 billion by now if AMD hadn't appeared in the scene as it has.
    Why ? AMD hasn't shipped a billion x86 chips yet, so even combined they wouldn't have shipped two billion chips yet. And without competition from AMD their CPUs would still be a lot more expensive and a bit slower, not exactly something that lets you sell more CPUs.

    --
    Jan
  4. What chips are they counting? by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I recall, in the 486, and possibly 386 days, didn't AMD manufacture over 20% of Intel's processors? I'm sure in the big picture it wasn't all that many, but how arbitrary is this 1 billion?

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
  5. Re:AMD effect ... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "They had already hit the 2 billion by now if AMD hadn't appeared in the scene as it has."

    x86 wouldn't be the dominant chip without AMD. Intel never would have landed the life-giving government contracts without AMD, as government regulations regarding purchasing required that a backup distributor be available with compatible products in case the primary distributor fell on hard times. Intel should be thanking AMD wholeheartedly for their help in securing x86's, and of course, Intel's future as market leaders.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  6. Bubba asks about the /. Culture by Arbogast_II · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I imagining it, or is it socially unacceptable to say good things about the "Powers That Be" in the IT industry in certain /. circles???

    Now, I have bought many AMD powered PCs, use Linux alot for getting work done, but think Windows is excellent (MS may be dirty dealing, but that's beside my point), and you gotta be blind not to realize Intel has made a gazillion excellent chips, even if like myself, you chose cheaper alternatives.

    It just seems like there are some creepy "Thought Police" types around here anytime something positive is said about corporations like Intel and MS..

    PS, I buy AMD and VIA CPU's cause they are cheap and work, not cause Intel "sux"...

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com