Slashdot Mirror
Intel Shipped 1 Billionth Computer Chip
murat submitted linkage to a simple little story that proclaims that Intel has recently shipped
it's One Billionth Chip. Quite an impressive accomplishment... it took them 25 years to reach the billions, but they estimate that they will hit 2 billion by only 2007.
any beer to go with that?
Je t'aime Stéphanie
blah blah blah 999999999th chip blah blah blah divide error blah blah blah
all futher jokes are now redundant
turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
...Unfortunately their count was thrown off a bit during the early Pentium years... They've really only shipped 999,999,999.999239230823 processors
I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
-Xenocrates
Would you like fries with that?
"But why have billions when we can have.....millions?"
Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).
AMD released it's AMD-1Billionth today, which the company states is actually rated as it's 17,275,000th processor.
-- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
Probably a microcontroller. Most of the manufacturers make way more of those than any other type.
Intel ships its 100th Itanium processor.
By 2007 it should reach the 200 milestone.
Citing Intel's recent announcement that they have shipped over 1 billion CPUs, and the fact that they have not licensed a billion copies of DOS/Windows, Microsoft has launched a piracy investigation. "It's clear that there are CPU's out there running Windows illegally. The numbers simply do not match up." said Microsoft counsel Mike Rebadow. "We've of course accounted for IBM DOS and DR DOS sold in the 80's, as well as OS/2 which licensed Windows, but that still leaves hundreds of millions of CPUs unaccounted for. Piracy is the only way to explain this."
The intel family of PC processors actually started with the 8080. It was released in April 1974 running at 2MHz, and is generally considered to be the first truly usable microprocessor design. It was used in many early computers, and formed the basis for machines running CP/M. The first single-board microcomputer was built on the basis of the 8080. The 8088 was actually released before the 8086, but as the article states the 8086 was developed first.
Something clever...
Well the original had 29,000 transistors, and the P4 has about 55 million... so to sum it up... a shitton (thats is a technical term for the number).
Great Linux Site
However, that doesn't stop your "joke" from "sucking donkey cocks" and being "-1, Offtopic".
It sounds like this is actually the billionth *CPU* from Intel, not the billionth chip. Intel produces quite a lot of other silicon in addition to the CPUs it is best known for, and I suspect that Intel actually passed the billion *chip* mark many years ago.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
define 'in use'
;-)
I have ancient/old PCs currently serving in a security mode...
i.e. piled from floor to ceiling infront of the only window with ground access
People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people
That's more than 1 per second since 1 billion seconds is almost 32 years.
I hear they're planning on releasing a new chip to celebrate this milestone. The chip will be based on the p4 architecture, and will be known as the p4 Type S. It will feature speed increasing kanji stickers, sporty wing, and a custom fan guaranteed to dull your hearing.
All these new features will come at a bit more of a cost but are guaranteed to increase your cpu's power by 50%.
AMD gave them a run during the 1GHz era but Intel is now ahead of the competition. I'm sure that the competition helped Intel reach this billion mark faster than it would have without competition. AMD with its once faster and cheaper chips helped lower the prices of Intel chips.
Competition is good for the consumer. Let's see what happens with Intel's prices now that there're on top.
--- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
There have actually been 50 billion chips shipped. "Some of these chips, such as the 3.06ghz, are as much as 100 times faster than others, allowing pirates to encode music 100 times as fast. Thus, for our numbers, Intel has shipped over 50 billion chips" said RIAA president Hilary Rosen.
Probably not. Ripped from intel.com:
Based on combined desktop, laptop and server shipment data from industry analyst firm Mercury Research*, Intel has shipped over one billion x86 CPUs as of April 2003, roughly 25 years after the debut of the first 8086 microprocessor on June 8, 1978.
It was from the x86 family. Have a nice day, thanks for playing.
Great Linux Site
I'm thinking they should go with ;)
"Over 1 billion Server'd"
"Don't forget the prunes." L. Francis Herreshoff
That is one hell of a beowulf cluster!
How many chips would a chipmunk ship if a chipmunk could ship chips?
Money for nothing, pix for free
shipped it's One Billionth Chip.
In an unrelated story, Slashdot served up its one billionth page containing a CmdrTaco grammatical error...
They had already hit the 2 billion by now if AMD hadn't appeared in the scene as it has.
Why ? AMD hasn't shipped a billion x86 chips yet, so even combined they wouldn't have shipped two billion chips yet. And without competition from AMD their CPUs would still be a lot more expensive and a bit slower, not exactly something that lets you sell more CPUs.
Jan
McDonalds opened in the Midwest (Des Plaines, IL, acutally) in 1955.
Their 50 billionth hamburger was served in New York city in or around 1984.
That's ~30 years, or an average of 1 2/3 billion per year.
To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
Heck, the term "computer chip" is so generic that a BCD converter or a DAC fits the definition (sneaks under the wire, barely). A microcontroller most certainly qualifies. Microcontrollers are usually simple CPUs with registers, instruction sets, etc. just like a big CPU. Moot point, though, because they're talking about Intel shipping its billionth x86 family chip.
If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
If I recall, in the 486, and possibly 386 days, didn't AMD manufacture over 20% of Intel's processors? I'm sure in the big picture it wasn't all that many, but how arbitrary is this 1 billion?
Two Rules For Success:
1) Never tell people everything you know.
"They had already hit the 2 billion by now if AMD hadn't appeared in the scene as it has."
x86 wouldn't be the dominant chip without AMD. Intel never would have landed the life-giving government contracts without AMD, as government regulations regarding purchasing required that a backup distributor be available with compatible products in case the primary distributor fell on hard times. Intel should be thanking AMD wholeheartedly for their help in securing x86's, and of course, Intel's future as market leaders.
-- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
Shitton (n.): 1) An ambibously large number, larger than a crapton, but less than a holyfuckton.
Am I imagining it, or is it socially unacceptable to say good things about the "Powers That Be" in the IT industry in certain /. circles???
Now, I have bought many AMD powered PCs, use Linux alot for getting work done, but think Windows is excellent (MS may be dirty dealing, but that's beside my point), and you gotta be blind not to realize Intel has made a gazillion excellent chips, even if like myself, you chose cheaper alternatives.
It just seems like there are some creepy "Thought Police" types around here anytime something positive is said about corporations like Intel and MS..
PS, I buy AMD and VIA CPU's cause they are cheap and work, not cause Intel "sux"...
HenryJamesFeltus.com
I wonder what fraction of these one billion have already been obsoleted and are now sitting in landfills?
Given Moore's Law, I'll bet it's a high share.
org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
Thus,
.536*141.6e9/173e6 dollars. That works out to $438.67 Current list prices for the Intel Pentium III, 3.06 GHz, range from $365-$759.99, with an average price listing of $459.53.
13139006 * e^(.17329 * x)
Where x is in years is the cumulative output of Intel.
This allows us to calculate with high accuracy the size of Intel's production line, a secret coveted by industry insiders. Differentiating, we have:
2276816 * e^(.17329 * x)
Thus, Intel currently has 173 million processors in various production stages.
This allows us to calculate another secret, coveted by all geeks - the true value of an Intel CPU.
Intel's current market capitalization is 141.6 billion US$. Based on their Q1 2003 quarterly report, 53.6% of their cost of production (including R&D and other expenses) goes into the Intel Architecture business unit.
If we know the size of the production line, the current valuation, and the percentage dedicated to CPU production, we can compute an average valuation for an Intel CPU.
Each current issue Intel CPU should be worth, on average
Conclusion - for every current release Intel CPU you buy, on average you are being ripped off by about $20.86, about 4.75% the value of the product. That is less than sales tax, and doesn't seem like the work of a greed hungry power monster.
Any similar statistics on Microsoft's product valuation would be highly interesting.
And just imagine all the pollution and garbage that's produced with those billion chips!
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
Just to clarify since a few of you were wondering and we're the source of the information: - It's 1 billion x86 CPUs (8086 thru P4, all flavors). No 8080x, i960s, Xscale, etc is counted. - Intel's figure is 1 billion. AMD is about 200 million units of x86 for the same time frame. Also, Intel never comes out and says what their own data shows, primarily due to reasons related to stock,the SEC and the competion. There were some hints that Intel probably reached 1 billion before external researchers thought they did, but nothing official.
I think I can safely say that ARM has shipped approximately 0 processors. They have, however, licenced their technology to a whole range of semiconductor manufacturers, including Intel, who do all the mucking about with silicon and god-knows-what.
Ok, I'm being a little pedantic.. I'd be interested to know how many ARM processors had been produced by all these manufacturers - must be quite a few!