Bono (Not That Bono) Would Like To Head The RIAA
A semi-anonymous reader writes "In a suprising display of confusion over what 'public service' really means, Rep. Mary Bono wants to fill the shoes of departing RIAA chief exec Hillary Rosen while also forming a new congressional caucus on piracy and copyright issues. Political watchdog groups in Washington questioned the idea of someone being a possible job candidate for the music industry's lobby and also a founding member of a caucus focused on some of the industry's most important policy concerns. Has anyone formed a lobbying group specifically to advance the position of us little people?"
only someone stupid enough to mary sonny...
...is whether she plans to resign at her old job (you know, being in the U.S. House of Representatives) before taking on a new one involving a rather obvious conflict of interest.
Has anyone formed a lobbying group specifically to advance the position of us little people?
No.
Well, unless you mean this.
I have been pwned because my
Earlier today, when I saw "Bono to head RIAA" on the Drudge Report, I was shocked! But I didn't bother to RTFA. I always thought that Lars Ulrich from Metallica was next in line.
- tom -
More about these issues.
The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
The RIAA is dying, just like Sonny Bono when he hit that tree, and BSD. That's because no one buys CDs anymore. $20 bucks, and maybe you get one good song? So Mary Bono wants to be the next captain of the sinking ship? It won't be the only thing she has gone down on!
I'd like to run against here but I'm gonna need about 2 million dollars to run a campaign. You slashdotters need to put your money where your mouth is and give me someone money to beat this lady and send here packing. If you need further info as to where to send money to you can email me at mylifesavings@swissaccounts.com or conman@nigiria.419.com. This matter is strictly of confidential nature as such must be kept secret.
-----
One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
Here's Noam Chomsky:
... the bitch wasn't on the slopes with Sonny when he bought the farm..
There are a lot of lobbying groups that advance the position of us little people. Bent over and grabbing our ankles is a positing, right?
Chris Kuivenhoven is a thief, beware
What makes you think Hillary Rosen was any better? According to you, Hillary Rosen didn't want to eliminate fair use and make copyright perpetua?
social sciences can never use experience to verify their statemen
Noam Chomsky is so full of shit his eyes are brown.
I mean, name another linguist who only speaks one fucking language!
If you look up con artist in the dictionary (an English one) you see Chomsky's picture.
She'll use her dead husband to help further the RIAA's agenda.
Do It For Sonny! will be the rallying cry and the sheepish Senators will vote 'Yeah'.
Get a fucking grip, you imbecile.
I'm not little, I'm 6'4", and I don't see why DC needs a midget special interest group.
Best Slashdot comment ever
It sounds like Bono is being paid off for her getting the Bono copyright extension act passed.
How many of you out there are wondering when the first talk of heading up the RIAA came up as related to the timeline of the Sony Bono Copyright Act?
Fight Spammers!
And the rest of the article goes on to quote groups raising eyebrows at a congress creature wanting to be a lobbyist.
I think Mary Bono is a threat right where she is. It's not smart, polite or useful to wish death on someone however. What we are up against is both an industry with lots of lobbying muscle, and a Government with a receptive ear, even forgetting the campaign cash. We need sustained, adroit and well-heeled lobbying of our own if we hope to counter these threats in a meaningful way. Threats and jeers just lose us credibility.
"Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers
The ACLU is not for "the little people". They engage in numerous cases where they get involved in lawsuits to censor individuals.
They also have an entire division devoted to increasing racial discrimination, as long as the discrimination against individuals is considered "remedial".
Yes, in other areas and cases, they "do the right thing". However, the pro-discrimination and pro-racism cases are inexecusable.
Chomsky tends to skew everything to fit the invalid and destructive pseudo-religion of Marxism. If the facts don't fit the Marxist view (and they almost always do not), he has no problem with making up things to further the idea.
"The United States has a very violent labor history, much more so than Europe."
Of course, it is all one-sided to Chomsky. I'm sure he forgets that the union leaders are very often the ones who initiate the violence.
"The RIAA is dying, just like Sonny Bono when he hit that tree, and BSD"
When Sonny hits a tree, and he dies like BSD, that's RIAA.
If you have Metallica in your path, and you get Lars' wrath, that's RIAA
When you're kicked out of college, cuz of your drive Hillary gains knowledge, that's RIAA.
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
Capitalism is not a religion: it is nothing other than the idea that people can make their own decisions about their economic lives. It is not invalid or destructive.
Typically, it is the unions that start the violence. All that has to happen is for workers to try to get into the workplace if there is a picket line nearby. The non-workers (strikers) often insult the workers (juvenile, but not violent), but they also throw rocks, block paths, smash vehicles, threaten to kill.
The cases of the unions starting the violence are quite numerous, and typically the only violence from the boss/workers' side is when strikers assault people and the victims fight back.
"Workers, no matter what they do for a living need to "get it" that the bosses are our enemy, we are not each others' enemies"
Bosses are nothing but trading partners. If they are the enemy, then you should never enter their factories or workplaces.
Interesting alternate history about Hoffa that you presented.
I see. No need to take a stand about anything he is talking about. He is just full of shit, period. You just convinced me, really!
"Baa, baa, sheep. You're not one of the very few that can actually take issue with Chomsky on factual grounds"
Taking issue with Chomsky on factual grounds is like fighting your way out of a wet paper bag: it is very very easy. All you have to do is read one or two of his paragraphs, and you will find a few lies on it.
I'm speaking of his political views, of course. He is an ackowledged genius in linguistics. That is the only field where he has any authority.
"Oh yeah, absolutely. Pinkertons and other assorted thugs were NEVER employed to beat up workers. Honest, guv"
Sure they did, just as union strikers have also beat up workers. The thugs exist on both sides. By the way, the Pinkertons tended more to beat up strikers, not workers.
That is real history: the way things have happened and do happen. It is not the alternate reality made up from the imagination and mean spirit of Noam Chomsky.
Take his word for it. Outside of the field of linguistics, Chomsky is a chumpsky; a pseudo-intellectual so full of self-grandeur, that when his crackpot theories get rejected, he makes up more crackpot theories (Manufacturing Consent) to conjure up vast conspiracies that keep him down. Not only that, he is anti-semitic, and has been quick to defend Pol Pot's "Killing Fields" (by saying Pol Pot killed hardly anyone, and the U.S. made him do it).
This is unfortunately very common among demagogues of all stripes: "I am telling the truth about Them. The reason no one believes me is because They have silenced me."
Well...it would be hard to track that, but here is a list of the labels that ARE members:
RIAA Members
(Yeah, I know, I'm such a karma whore.)
I'd like to graciously offer MY services as a replacement to Hilary.
Here's a story from Forbes. My favorite is the last paragraph. Our only problem with Rosen was the RIAA going after Napster. Umm...sure.