Slashdot Mirror


Palm OS Wristwatch

countach writes "Amazon are taking orders for a new Palm OS Wrist Watch. It has an infra-red port, touch screen, back-light, stylus and 2MB of RAM. Price is $US 295.00." Because sometimes you don't look nerdy enough ;)

37 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. I don't think Fossil did their homework... by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So whoâ(TM)s the market? The guys who enjoy the nostalgia of the daily beatings, 0% chance that any girl would talk to them, and the smell of the inside of a locker, because they had a Casio CFX-40 Calculator Watch?

    Mike

    1. Re:I don't think Fossil did their homework... by nilepoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well this is the second or third attempt at this, and according to a wired article from a couple of months ago, they broke some of the major rules in watch design in making this. One, and they admitted it is a big one, was exceeding the (percieved by the public) height limitation of a watch case.

      I give it a couple of months at the most. Just like the last few designs. Palm sales are on the decline anyway, and I can't see a watch getting a better reception than some of really cool designs that are out now.

    2. Re:I don't think Fossil did their homework... by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Jeez louise, that first year they came out (before the Math teachers were aware of their existance) was sweet. You could just blantantly be fiddling with your watch during a math test and no one would know what you were doing. By the next year they'd caught on.

      Are there any purists out their who don't allow calculators in math anymore? Last I checked almost all students use graphing calculators (wimps!)

    3. Re:I don't think Fossil did their homework... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you are saying that you can't understand math if you use a calculator?

      Nope. I say that the learning process is better if you learn how to do it first without a calculator.

      I would say that it would be easier to learn, or at least grade math when calculators are used.

      And I'd say (snarkily) that you've never taught math.

      Think about it; if what you are really after is getting your students to understand the concepts, then why dissallow calculators that prevent them from getting incorrect answers from arithmatic errors ('oops, forgot to carry the 2' or some shit).

      The point of learning something is to master it. In the grand scheme of things learning the fundamentals of math and futzing up an answer here or there due to an arithmetic error is exponentially better than *not* knowing fundaments and relying on your calculator for everything. Teaching math also means teaching how to think logically, how to understand the underlying principals so you can apply them to other situations than the ones presented in your homework.

      For instance I also taught calculus. Whole chapters were devoted to graphing equations using maxima, minima and inflection points. Now, some kids wanted to use their graphing calculator to come up with the answers (and undoubtedly did when they did their homework), but they screwed themselves in the long run. Why? Because the point of graphing 40 equations wasn't to make pretty pictures, it was to drill the student in taking first and second derivatives, finding local maxima and minima, etc. Those who took the easy way out using their calculators were royally fucked when in the next section you had to apply those newly taught skills to solve minimization problems.

  2. How many beatings by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    will it take before this madness is stopped?!

    Won't someone think of the (geeky) children?

    Friends don't let friends drive drunk girls away.

  3. Precarious? by mgcsinc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I already have a dandy of a time just keeping the crystal of my little Seiko from getting scratched up, how am I gonna manage to keep a touch screen safe on my wrist? Not to mention incidental pushing of the on-screen buttons. I know these are relativly logistical concerns, but these things could prove annoying...

    1. Re:Precarious? by jpellino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, yeah - like 'accidentally' getting 12,000+ copies of an appointment from repetitive hand motions...

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    2. Re:Precarious? by beee · · Score: 5, Informative

      This was exactly my reaction too -- I'm very interested to see how Palm handled this, if they handled it at all.

      I've had a part in developing a few touchscreen devices and this was a problem our group ran to as well (our hardware was going to be situated in high-traffic areas and geared towards kids, who would no doubt put it through the ringer).

      Touchscreens work by sensing not only your "x" and "y" position on the screen, but most of them now also have what's called the "z-loc" (or z-pin depending on the hardware manufac.), and it's basically a way to sense where someone has gently pushed their finger onto the surface. It's calculated using the same sensors, but it reports many less false-positives because it only detects when someone makes a motion "downwards" towards the screen.

      The problem I can see is that when the surface of the monitor (or in this case, watch) becomes irregular, the z-pin stuff has trouble picking up actual signals, and sometimes sits there reporting signals constantly. It relies on the regularity of the surface of the device. Considering watches' ability to become scratched up (ever tried doing hardware upgrades on a Compaq desktop machine with a watch on? ;), I'm very interested to see how Palm prevented this from happening. If they haven't accounted for it, you could see a massive return-rate because your watch thinks you're opening your address book 24/7.

      --


      + Donald Gunth
      + Email: dgunth@quicktek.net
      "Caffeine is the greatest lubricant ever created." -ESR
  4. Price bump? by greenfly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Am I the only one that remembered them quoting $149 for this watch back last fall when slashdot did the original story on it?

    It could simply have been a mixup on the part of whoever submitted the story, since their old pda watches (non-Palm) were $149, but still, I got my hopes up until I saw the $300 price tag.

  5. Name not good... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can Palm make a Wrist product? They should prolly change the name of the OS to Wrist OS or something...

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Name not good... by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, doesn't it use an ARM processor?

  6. This watch will change everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... when they do the Pulp Fiction remake in 5 years.

    Just imagine the scene between the army dad and the dead guy's son - "I kept this watch up my ass for 5 years - and I have the photos to prove it!".

  7. Why is it so ugly? by rkz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00009QR9X.01.LZ ZZZZZZ.jpg
    Would you wear one of these? Its huge and the screen looks like it escaped from the 1980's.
    There have been watches that allow syncing with PIMs for years (equally ugly). The MS SPOT watches look more interesting with their GRPS internet connectivity.
    In this day and age they could have used OLED technology to make the face colour and themeable, so you could download nice different facias off the net when you felt like a change.

    1. Re:Why is it so ugly? by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Informative

      MS SPOT watches with GRPS internet connectivity? I may have missed something, but the articles I've seen about the new MS SPOT watches have nothign to do with GRPS. They get their data via the FM band, and it is one way. That is, the SPOT watch can recieve information about weather, stocks, etc, but it's not two way and it ain't GRPS. Story here.

      Do you have any photos of these? None of the stories I read had any photos, just words.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  8. I think Fossil DID their homework... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and they're funded by a VC firm made up entirely of optometrists. The flash demo on the Amazon site is at least 1.5x actual size - so we'll all be going blind in record time. Trifocals not included.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  9. See? by sporty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See what happens if you get a watch designer to make a computer watch? You get a good asthetic design.

    I hate the hybdrid device indusustry where one company thinks they can do "both" really well. It's prolly why a lot of pda phones fail. Pair up with Samsun or nokia and get a phone good design, work with MS or Palm to get a good software interface on there.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  10. Why? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a Palm and I love it. However, when I use it, I rarely think to myself "if only I could be holding my arm awkwardly up to my face right now, life would be perfect". Likewise, it is only infrequently that I moan over how much extra screen real estate my Palm has. Since these two things seem to be the only problems that the Palm Watch solves, why would I want to spend $300 on it?

  11. Cool idea, lousy implementation by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I'm usually an all-out advocate of PalmOS and am generally happy to see new and different offerings, I can't help but think that this is a bad idea.

    First, the reviews I've seen (based on earlier versions) showed this to be really big and clunky. I know it can be hip to be square, but this might be pushing the limits a bit.

    It's pretty expensive, especially considering what you can get in a full-out PDA for the price.

    It will take a little getting used to for regular Palm users, as it deviates a little bit from some of the standard interface widgets (no icons for "home," for example -- you just "back out" of whatever program you're in). Plus, it'll be tough to do many things on such a small screen (but, again, this is a new approach).

    Finally, from what I've read (including on the Fossil site), it won't synchronize directly with a computer. You have to load up special software on an existing Palm, and then use that software to sync selected data from your handheld to the watch (via IR). I suppose that someone might be able to hack together a CPU-based IR sync system, but that should be standard equipment.

    I'll be interested to see where this goes, but I'm frankly a little disappointed, especially with regards to synchronization -- I think that'll be the biggest complaint (right before how big the thing is).

    1. Re:Cool idea, lousy implementation by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 4, Informative

      Finally, from what I've read (including on the Fossil site), it won't synchronize directly with a computer. You have to load up special software on an existing Palm, and then use that software to sync selected data from your handheld to the watch (via IR). I suppose that someone might be able to hack together a CPU-based IR sync system, but that should be standard equipment.

      WRONG (from amazon):

      How do I synchronize a Wrist PDA with a PC?
      Included with the Wrist PDA is the HotSync Pod, which enables you to synchronize information between your Wrist PDA and your PC. Connect the cable from the HotSync Pod to the port on the back of the watch when recharging, or to perform a HotSync operation. You will initially need to install some software.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  12. More choices by Traa · · Score: 3, Informative

    So Fossil offers us a Palm based wristwatch. We already all knew about the Linux based wristwatch from IBM right. What the Slashdot crowd really needs to know is that the Microsoft/MSN based wristwatch will be here this fall. :-)

    ok, so maybe not as breakthrough as to deserve any attantion, it does look to offer IM through Microsoftâ(TM)s dynamic new Smart Personal Objects Technology platform.

  13. Water proof? by kyoko21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this watch waterproof? The screen is touch-screen, but where do you put the stylus? Does it have a stylus? I hate to loose the stylus underwater.

    There is nothing like checking my list of contacts and to-do list (never know when you need reminding of stopping by at the local hardware store after a day of underwater welding) and picking up a few daily necessities, like some Doritos...mmmmm.

    1. Re:Water proof? by wizzy403 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is *NOT* waterproof. Check the FAQ section of the PDF on Amazon's site for more details. It is not waterproof, not water reisitant, and should not be allowed to get wet or damp. *sigh*

  14. Accessories by Cappy+Red · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sheesh. Super-ultra-retro-nerdy. They're even giving a choice of accessories with every purchase:

    1) Yellow super dectective hat
    2) Pocket protector and sliderule with matching taped glasses.
    3) Official James Bond "nuclear watch" tuxedo
    4) Rubber stamp that says "I just bought a $300 watch and only got 2 megs of RAM!" It even comes with a guide to forehead application.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  15. but does it tell time? by tuffy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I might need a second watch for that...

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  16. cheaper version of the same watch for $179 by Giant+Killer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fossil licensed this technology, but Abacus makes a cheaper version for $179. Not quite as cool looking, but quite a bit less money to shell out.

  17. battery life is 4 days!! by geeklawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    wow thats useful. My digital watch hasnt had a battery change since I bought it 2 years ago.
    info

    pass...

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal
  18. Umm, not impressed. by Pionar · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the specs:

    Average battery life: Approx. 4 days (Based on an average use of 30 minutes per day, with backlight set OFF. The battery life varies depending on the temperature and conditions of use.)

    So, in other words, it has a 2-hr battery. So much for using it on a long road trip. Do they expect me to plug it into a cigarette lighter? I can just see the headline now:

    DUMBASS CRASHES CAR

    Keeps watch on during recharging; can't turn left.

  19. A Better Idea by umrgregg · · Score: 3, Funny


    Duct tape and an iPod; slap it on your wrist. Hey, at least it will be sexier.

    --
    NMG
  20. Hmmm... by manduwok · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Amazon are taking orders for a new Palm OS Wrist Watch.

    Amazon also claims that "All your orders are belong to us."

  21. Sheesh, RTFA! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not really a Palm if you wear it on your wrist!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  22. Timely watch article by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gee, this was only announced 30 weeks ago at Comdex Fall. Perhaps a watch article could be on time?

  23. Re:Calculator Watches by uunh+haun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just bought a casio wave ceptor. Not only does it have a calculator, but it recieves the time via radio waves. So I know exactly when it is 12:21:17, 11:21:25, 11:21:32....

  24. Sorry... by yellowstone · · Score: 5, Funny

    No way I'm getting one of these. The screen is just way too large. I'm holding out for the Palm OS Pinky Ring.

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
  25. A wristwatch with a 4-day battery life? by metamatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

    Maybe I'm a freak, but I have some fairly simple requirements for a wristwatch, which come down to wanting it to tell the time without needing me to go through unnecessary dicking around:

    1. It needs to work for years on end, without my needing to wind it or change batteries at all.

    2. It needs to be accurate to a few seconds a week or better, so I don't need to adjust it more often than travel and time zones dictate anyway.

    3. It needs to be waterproof to any depth I'm likely to swim to without serious diving gear.

    4. It needs to be shockproof enough to withstand (for example) my accidentally slamming it into doors.

    5. It needs to be light enough that I don't feel like I have a brick tied to my wrist.

    6. It needs to be easy to read in daylight and in the dark.

    On top of that, it's a bonus if it isn't horribly ugly or repulsively ostentatious (hello, Rolex owners).

    The requirements all seem fairly obvious to me, but you'd be surprised how hard it is to find a watch that fits the bill. I tried a Seiko Kinetic, but the mechanisms need servicing every few years.

    So now I have a Casio G-Shock with a titanium case and solar panels on the face. At the time I bought it there was only one model of G-Shock with solar power and titanium casing, and it ended up being pretty expensive considering its borderline ugliness.

    So anyway, a watch which has a battery life measured in days is about as much use to me as an Athlon heatsink made of chocolate. I wouldn't buy it if it was $5.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  26. US $295 short ... by hackster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... and about 20 years late to market. My old Seiko RC-1000 Data Terminal from 1983 did almost as much with 2K memory, 6 buttons and a 2-conductor serial interface to a TRS 100 / Olivetti M10 (software on cassette). No touch screen (thank goodness) but no market then, and no market now ... except for collectors ...

    FWIW ...

  27. Re:Get an OnHand PC Watch! by isaac · · Score: 3, Interesting
    That Fossil Palm watch isn't a full PDA, it still needs to sync up with a regular Palm (or PC)

    You're thinking of fossil's other so-called PDA watch. This one runs Palm OS and has a 160x160 screen. It is a "real PDA." You can sync it to a PC, but you can also enter data directly into it with grafitti or an on-screen keyboard.

    I suggest looking into the only true watch-PDA, the onHand PC Watch. It has an estimated three months battery life, as opposed to the Fossil's 4 days (at 30 minutes a day).

    The Fossil uses a rechargeable battery - IOW, put the watch on a charger while you sleep. The onHand uses lithium coin cells that you have to pay to replace every few months. It also has a downright painful interface, compared to the button/rocker switch/touchscreen input of this fossil watch.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  28. Has potential by OpenMind(tm) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think maybe the point should not be "they made a Palm that fits on your wrist" so much as "they made a wristwatch you can easily write software for." I think most Palm software will be useless on this thing, but there are probably a lot of form-factor specific applications that could be written for it. I must say I was amused to see it has the same screen resolution as the Zire. But really, to make it useful, you just need to double your adherence to the PalmOS design criterion mandating that any serious data entry must be done from the companion PC. And while you're at it, quadruple your concern for screen real estate. Given a proper hardware design, however, I think this could be a cool gadget.

    As for programs I think would be nice, there are a few. PalmReader might be doable, ditto Avantgo with the hardware navigation features from the 5.0 beta. Anything like a scaled down DateBook5 would make the platform. Think todos with alarms, event templates, and custom schedule views. Of course keeping in mind that almost all data entry will be on the desktop. Memo reader would be dead. Voice memos would be nice, pending appropriate hardware. Calcul-8! would probably be doable. Address Book could more or less work without modification (except for a bigger font), and would probably be one of the most useful things. But I think most of the killer apps are things we wouldn't even think of for the full sized palms

    For a proper hardware design, I would have to insist on a few things. Number one, the digitizer must be easy to turn off. Really, it should be off most of the time. Number two, there must be sufficient hardware buttons (figure out a way to fit on a 5-way controller, and the thing will get way more useful). Number three, a super durable digitizer, or at least an indestructable, snap closed screen for when you are not entering data. Number four, a very sharp, high-contrast display. I kind of wish they could have shoehorned wi-fi or bluetooth onto this thing, in which case it would be a great little streaming news and email reading device. Another great thing would be an attachable fresnel lens to boost readability when you need it.