Slashdot Mirror


Sen Hatch Would Like To Destroy Filetraders' PCs

CBackSlash writes "Sen. Hatch is interested in technology to remotely destroy computers. But it would only be used if you're downloading copyrighted material, and only the copyright owner should be able to wield this awesome power, since having the feds do it would be against the law. Here is the AP story from Yahoo!."

11 of 1,372 comments (clear)

  1. Here was my posting of the story: by efatapo · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Washington Post reports that the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Orrin Hatch from Utah, said Tuesday he favors developing new technology to remotely destroy the computers of people who illegally download music from the Internet. A notably quote: "If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize [the seriousness of their actions]". Hatch has a personal interest, since I'm sure his music is pirated on a regular basis. ;)"

    Just thought people might appreciate other links and such...guess I should've submitted it a couple minutes earlier....oh well :)

  2. What's up w/ the Hatches? by drgroove · · Score: 4, Informative

    First Hatch's son is one of the lawyers pursuing the SCO case, now Orrin is talking smack about filesharing...

    Will someone please investigation campaign contributions made to Orrin? I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that Microsoft has made significant contributions to Mr. Hatch's past campaigns.

  3. Campaign contributors by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 5, Informative
    Orrin's top contributors.

    1. HealthSouth Corp $38,255
    2. Pfizer Inc $34,000
    3. Qwest Communications $29,000
    4. Metabolife $27,250
    5. AT&T $25,499
    6. Torchmark Corp $25,000
    7. AOL Time Warner $24,000
    8. GlaxoSmithKline $21,000
    9. Novell Inc $20,500
    10. SmithKline Beecham $20,499
    11. Oracle Corp $19,750
    12. Global Crossing $19,500
    13. Verizon Communications $19,500
    14. Pharmaceutical Rsrch & Mfrs of America $18,775
    15. Viacom Inc $18,750
    16. Schering-Plough Corp $18,000
    17. Bear Stearns $17,750
    18. SBC Communications $17,500
    19. Merck & Co $17,440
    20. Rexall Sundown Inc $17,000
    21. Walt Disney Co $17,000
    1. Re:Campaign contributors by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Informative

      1. HealthSouth Corp $38,255

      As in this Healthsouth?

      I guess piracy, although applicable to a 13 year old kid who downloads a Metallica song, is not applicable to the likes of Ken Lay and Richard Scrushy. I would suggest that if the Senator is truly concerned about fighting crime, he start by returning the money bilked from Healthsouth investors.

  4. Re:Later in the discussion... by IdleTime · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, rather than waste your bytes on /., do as I did, go to Senator Hatch's website and send him a message complaining about his support for such an attrocity.

    Here is a direct link to his feedback/email page: Contact Form

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  5. Re:Why would he do that? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The DMCA passed the Senate Unanimously. Both wings of the Corporate Party can be blamed.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  6. Re:This is already possible - Grubbnix! by zoloto · · Score: 3, Informative

    the source is available if you contact the right people who are inactive from the CDC, that, and I put it up on kazaa as Hucknet-0x4A.tar.gz (the variant I knew of).

    have fun :)

  7. Brent O. Hatch is named here: by Chyeburashka · · Score: 3, Informative
    In this Amended Complaint, Orin Hatch's son Brent O. Hatch is listed right at the very top and near the bottom. A lot of interesting stuff in between.

    On the subject of loose cannon Senators, the Senator from Disney, Ernest Hollings, got quite a severe mocking today from Rush Limbaugh. Rush was making fun of Hollings saying that the problem with America was "too much consumption".

    Can any good Mormons out there explain how the belief that you will (if you pay your tithes, etc) someday become a GOD affect your world view. This is on topic since Orin, Brent, Darl, and most of the SCO board are all apparently Mormons, as is the named Judge, Dale A. Kimball.

  8. Re:HATCH and the DMCA by eclectro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, Hatch is 0wn3d by special interests;

    He was co author of the DMCA, and also responsible for the Copyright Term Extension Act, or CTEA.

    He also was responsible for a bill that would have extended the term of the patent for Claritin, as he use Schering-Plough's corporate jet when he was running for president.

    He is also a backer of the patriot act, legislation that made it easier for the FBI to use Carnivore, and other legislation that erodes our civil rights. I could go on and on.

    He doesn't even bother talking out of both sides of his mouth. He knows that when election time comes the sheeple will vote for him like they do everytime because he belongs "to the right party" (republican). I live in Utah and it makes me sick watching it. Republican leaders in the state legislature have said "you can't be a mormon and vote democrat." So nobody does, and Republicans hold 95% of major public offices in Utah.

    Out of all of congress, he is the one most responsible for the infinite and perpetual copyrights we have today.

    The greatest thing that could be done to advance our civil and online rights is to get Senator Hatch out of office.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  9. What's that sound? by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Informative

    Senator Hatch:

    For your reading pleasure, I bring several paragraphs which would like a word with you:

    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Amendment V

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment VI

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

  10. Re:To each member of the judicary I wrote: by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Great post - I couldn't have said it better myself. Perhaps a link to your source could make it even more credible.

    --
    Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient