Gentoo, Fink, and DarwinPorts Join Forces
Mr. Quick writes "From Metapkg, "In order to better provide freely-available software to users of Mac OS X and Darwin, we Fink, Gentoo, and DarwinPorts commit ourselves to work together." A unified front for free software on Mac OS X is something that was needed."
I admit, I'm a little bleary eyed at the moment, but I don't see any broken links here ...
...
Every link in the story seems to have its requisite http:// at the front
Can someone tell me which link isn't working?
Tim
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
For the curious: the link before fink was missing a slash. (http:/ rather than http://)
... (Konqueror? IE? Safari?)
Anyone who was seeing this as broken, I wonder which browser(s) this choked
Mozilla worked fine.
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
Yeah, all developers in this world should hail the great leader rxed the 634882th because he obviously knows more than we all do! Have you ever written a single line of code yourself?
Sig you!
Take the defactoness of rpm
:wq).
0 0........001%, but we can always dream.
Take the power of apt-get
Mix with the strength of emerge.
And take the ease of use of Mandrake.
To make a
One unified linux, with one libc, one X (X 4.4), one desktop environment (KDE 3.2) and one text editor (nano, because ^X is better than
The true united linux, ready to take on the real enemeys (SCO, Microsoft).
The chances of this happening are 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 Debian/1.3-3 here ... I wonder if it's something that's changed between our versions of Mozilla, or (my guess) a Windows vs. Linux thing.
Thanks for the info.
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
Reality Distortion Field Enabled
Excuse me, what bundled software? This was pre-Safari, so even the web browser sucked. It has to have the least included software ever. Not even a decent text editor, bare bones word processor, or M$ Works clone! By comparison, IBM's OS/2 came fully featured.
Running X applications seemed tedious, alongside a native Linux system, and took no advantage of OSX's distinctive user interface (which, frankly, seems stultifying).
So, without buying hundreds of dollars of "professional" M$ software, or just turning the Mac into an X computer, I find it not very compelling.