Slashdot Mirror


Mastering Regular Expressions

gianluca writes "Having always been a heedful guy, I always duly did my homework, going through the lengthy manual pages of a number of regular expressions (regex) crunching tools. You name it: be it PERL, awk, emacs, sed or even one of the .NET framework languages -- any such program provides support for the same regex expressions (or at least, so they seem to the occasional observer). After some years of regex practice with these tools, I had the pretentious conviction that I knew my way through the intricacies of patterns, grouping, greediness, and the like. When I first stepped into Mastering Regular Expressions, looking at the nearly 500 pages which build up Friedl's book, I wondered what could someone ever have to say about regexes to fill so many pages." Gianluca ended up finding plenty of worthwhile content; read below for his review. Mastering Regular Expressions, 2nd edition author Jeffrey E. Friedl pages 460 publisher O'Reilly rating 9.5 reviewer Gianluca Insolvibile ISBN 0596002890 summary An in-depth guide to lead the apprentice to mastering regular expressions' wizardry

My first suspicion, I admit, was that I was facing one of the countless "man page reprints" that you find these days. It was only after reading the book that I eventually understood: before then, I had had no idea of what regexes were really about.

What it's about The book is logically divided into three parts: the first one (Chapters 1, 2 and 3) introduces the reader to the basic concepts of regexes, building a common ground upon which the subsequent chapters will be based. The introduction is clear and straightforward, and lets the readers quickly grasp the key points in the regex business. This part is more or less a good summary, presenting information that can be found also in existing manual pages (albeit presented in a distilled form, which lets you perceive that the author has very clear ideas about the matter). If you already know something about regexes, you could skip this part entirely -- even if reading it turns out to be a nice occasion to brush up and overhaul your knowledge.

The second part (Chapters 4, 5 and 6), is the one that struck me most for the depth of provided information and the richness of though. Rather than throwing at the reader usage dictates on one or another regex flavour, the author explains with a wealth of details the inward mechanisms which make regexes run and how you can exploit such knowledge to write better expressions.

Chapter 4 presents the different families of regex processing engines (namely, DFA, traditional and POSIX NFA), whose internal behavior differs so greatly that writing a regex in the appropriate way can make a substantial difference in both efficacy and efficiency. If you thought you knew it all about greedy and lazy regex operators, possessive quantifiers, backreferences and lookaround, you'd better think again: I was pleasantly surprised to discover how ignorant I was (to be honest, I had never heard of lookaround operators before!).

Chapter 5 slows down a little bit to let the reader absorb the massive previous chapter. Some simple (but still tricky) examples are presented, showing how to apply the techniques explained up to this point. A couple of examples are perhaps too contrived (ever needed to match aligned groups of 5 digits in an unspaced stream of characters?), but it is instructive anyway to follow the reasoning behind the construction of a complex regex.

Chapter 6 focuses on efficiency, considering how backtracking and matching can drive your regex engine to exponential complexities. Optimization techniques are then presented, first by explaining the automatic optimizations performed by the most common regex engines and then by giving a practical list of hints that you can follow to be sure that your expression will run as fast as possible. Again, I was quite surprised to find out how small changes in a regex can make such a big difference to the engine (and give rise to noticeable performance penalties if ignored).

What I absolutely liked most was that the author explains exactly why a certain optimization works, based on the information given in Chapter 4 (and provided that you have been able to assimilate it in the first pass). Finally, a paragraph entitled "Unrolling the loop" really put me in a good mood, reminding me of the past times of "old school" asm programming.

The third part of the book devotes three chapters to PERL, Java and .NET, respectively. Each chapter goes through the syntax and features of regexes for each language: while the information provided on Java and (VB).NET is quite commonplace, in the case of PERL the author deals with aspects rarely covered elsewhere, like dynamic regexes, embedded-code constructs, regex-literal overloading and specific optimization techniques.

What's to like In one word: insight. The author is definitely knowledgeable of regular expressions and the whole book is filled with thoughtful suggestions and hints. Still, a friendly and straightforward writing style makes reading pleasant and seldom boring (well, you wanted details, didn't you?) while you learn internal regex mechanics rarely available elsewhere.

A further nice point is the broad view offered to the reader, starting from regexes in general and focusing on specific flavours only in the final part of the book. The second edition also offers up-to-date information, covering the .NET framework and the latest versions of PERL (5.8) and Java (1.4).

What's to consider Despite the book's reassuring conversational tone, dealing with such a specific topic with so many in-depth details might sometimes become boring, especially if you do not have a strong interest in getting the most out of regular expressions or in knowing how they internally work. If you are just an occasional regex user and dwell in manual pages, you can probably live without this book. Also, it is a pity that specific sections on Tcl, emacs and awk have disappeared in the second edition (maybe they were not as current as the .NET framework ?) and that pcre (a C regex library) is barely mentioned. The summary Regular expressions are tied so strongly to the *nix culture that everyone who has been exposed to that culture has come to use them in a more or less conscious way. Still, most of the documentation around lags on basic features and presents only the most common regex operators. Mastering Regular Expressions is the book to read if you want to go further and get serious about regexes: even if extreme optimization might not be a big concern today, understanding how regex engines work under the hood greatly helps also in creating everyday small expressions. Table of Contents Preface
Chapter 1. Introduction to Regular Expressions
Chapter 2. Extended Introductory Examples
Chapter 3. Overview of Regular Expression Features and Flavors
Chapter 4. The Mechanics of Expression Processing
Chapter 5. Practical regex techniques
Chapter 6. Crafting a Regular Expression
Chapter 7. Perl
Chapter 8. Java
Chapter 9. .NET

You can purchase the Mastering Regular Expressions, 2nd edition from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

13 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. i mastered regular expressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    when figuring out the lameness filter

  2. Cheap prices on Half.com by cybermint · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just purchased an almost new copy on Half.com for under $15 including shipping. There are still a few left at prices far lower than amazon.com or bn.com. Here is the half/ebay link.

  3. Obligatory crap regexp joke by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny
    Regular expressions are tied so strongly to the *nix culture
    Shouldn't that be .*nix instead?
  4. Re:Don't go overboard by sharlskdy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And, REGEX is one HUGE hammer!

  5. Perl, not "PERL" by carl67lp · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's always surprised me when I see intelligent people write "PERL" when they refer to Larry Wall's programming language.

    From the Perl FAQ, General Questions About Perl:

    What's the difference between "perl" and "Perl"?
    One bit. Oh, you weren't talking ASCII? :-) Larry now uses ``Perl'' to signify the language proper and ``perl'' the implementation of it, i.e. the current interpreter. Hence Tom's quip that ``Nothing but perl can parse Perl.'' You may or may not choose to follow this usage. For example, parallelism means ``awk and perl'' and ``Python and Perl'' look ok, while ``awk and Perl'' and ``Python and perl'' do not. But never write ``PERL'', because perl isn't really an acronym, aprocryphal folklore and post-facto expansions notwithstanding.

    You can read the entire FAQ if you like.

    1. Re:Perl, not "PERL" by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

      From an interesting interview with Larry Wall - 1999..

      Marjorie: Well, that certainly answered the question fully. I must admit I didn't expect you to go back as far as the beginning of the Universe. :-) How'd you come up with that name?

      Larry: I wanted a short name with positive connotations. (I would never name a language ``Scheme'' or ``Python'', for instance.) I actually looked at every three- and four-letter word in the dictionary and rejected them all. I briefly toyed with the idea of naming it after my wife, Gloria, but that promised to be confusing on the domestic front. Eventually I came up with the name ``pearl'', with the gloss Practical Extraction and Report Language. The ``a'' was still in the name when I made that one up. But I heard rumors of some obscure graphics language named ``pearl'', so I shortened it to ``perl''. (The ``a'' had already disappeared by the time I gave Perl its alternate gloss, Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister.)

      Another interesting tidbit is that the name ``perl'' wasn't capitalized at first. UNIX was still very much a lower-case-only OS at the time. In fact, I think you could call it an anti-upper-case OS. It's a bit like the folks who start posting on the Net and affect not to capitalize anything. Eventually, most of them come back to the point where they realize occasional capitalization is useful for efficient communication. In Perl's case, we realized about the time of Perl 4 that it was useful to distinguish between ``perl'' the program and ``Perl'' the language. If you find a first edition of the Camel Book, you'll see that the title was Programming perl, with a small ``p''. Nowadays, the title is Programming Perl.

  6. I concur by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I completely concur with the poster's prejudices and pleasant surprise at the scope of the book. Having learned and used regex since 1986, and having worked on the internals of a couple lightweight C regex engines, I figured I knew all I needed to know. Having seen how many people just get hung up on the basic concept and syntax of regex, I assumed this was going to be a rehash.

    This is no "Learn Regex in 21 Days" or "Regex for Dummies" book with lots of tips on page 400 about how the | is useful for finding Jones OR Smith. If you haven't gotten that down yet, this book's not for you.

    As the reviewer says, this is a very worthwhile cover-to-cover read which will turn your empirical experiences with regex into a more structured understanding of the science and engineering of advanced regex. As a reference on my shelf, it sits comfortably next to Knuth's AoCP and Foley & van Damme.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  7. Re:Different than 1st Edition? by sharlskdy · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can read about the differences by clicking here, which is an article by the author outlining the differences.

  8. All i have to say is: by jdew · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats a big regex
    stupid filter wouldn't let me paste the regex here XD

  9. C++ Regular Expressions by TheOldBear · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Boost C++ libraries have a regular expression package. Take a look at http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/index.htm

    --
    Caution: Do not stare into laser with remaining eye.
  10. Regex rant by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with regex's is that if you don't use them often, you forget a lot of the finer details. They are not self-documenting at all. I think something like "generators" used in some of the compiler tools floating around are more intuative. For example, you can define a "LISP-lite" language like this:

    statement -> (command params)
    statement -> (command)
    params -> params params
    params -> constant
    params -> variable
    params -> statement

  11. Re:My problem with regular expressions... by Gabe+Garza · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Amen!

    I think a lot of the people who use RE's a lot would be well-served by brushing up on their recursive-descent parser writing skills. For only a little more time then it takes to write a regular expression, you can (if you know how) write a simple recursive-descent parser that:

    • Is more readable (and thus maintainable)
    • Is more efficient
    • Has the potential to have much better error handling (e.g., a descriptive message instead of just "RE doesn't match! Ack!")
    • Is much more scalable: recursive descent parsers can easily scale up to parsing an entire language (witness g++, which uses one to parse C++)
    • Is likely to be a great deal more correct, because it forces you to actually define a language, instead of just iteratively building up an RE
  12. My Version... by BinaryCodedDecimal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mastering Regular Expressions:

    Repeat after me:

    "I'm so hungry, I could eat a horse."

    "It's been raining cats and dogs."

    "I'll sleep with you when Hell freezes over."

    And my personal favourite:

    "Oh look, Hell just froze over!"