Linux Coming to Power Mac G5

Justen writes "Terra Soft, the people behind Yellow Dog Linux (YDL), announced that they will be supporting the new Power Mac G5. Since they are an Apple Authorized Reseller, you can purchase your Power Mac G5 through Terra Soft and have YDL pre-installed on a separate partition from Mac OS X. According to Terra Soft, 'as Yellow Dog Linux was in 2000 enabled for the IBM Power3 by IBM Lab and Linuxcare, and subsequently for the Power4, the effort to support the 970-based Apple computers is anticipated to be completed with relative ease.' Life is good. Anyone wanna loan me $2,000?"

Comments

Never understood this.

[digerata]

I'm sorry, but why in the hell would I want to pay the premimum cash for the premium computer and *not* run the premium OS X.

Re:Never understood this.

[ichimunki]

Considering it's impossible to buy one that won't ship OS X, your question makes little to no sense. This isn't going to be instead of OS X, but in addition to it. You still have the privilege of paying for the Mac OS, even if you don't plan to use it.

Re:Never understood this.

[Delphiki]

Personal preference? Linux can be made to be much more light weight than OS X, it is more customizable, etc, so I can understand why some people would want to use Linux, but I don't think I'd pay the extra for Mac hardware if I didn't want OS X.

Re:Never understood this.

[Parsec]

I think you could still strip OS X down to the Darwin core by modifying the rc scripts... or isn't that light-weight enough?

Personally, I use Macs for the UI and hardware integration... wishing to use Linux implies some compromise in those areas. Certainly, I'd consider Linux on Mac hardware for a server... but I'd have to see the performance numbers vs. generic Lintel hardware first and weigh Linux features vs. MOSX features. A big factor would be if you are running a file-server for MOSX, something which netatalk doesn't seem to do quite perfectly yet.

Re:Never understood this.

[trouser]

Actually I'd say you're the one who missed the point.

Pretty much all Linux apps can be compiled for all supported architectures and the pre-compiled binaries are available in several popular distributions (YDL, Debian and Gentoo spring to mind).

Besides, that's not why I, and I suspect many other folks, run Linux. It's free of restrictive licenses, you can get the source code to everything, you can reconfigure pretty much anything to work the way you want, you can become actively involved in the development of apps, drivers, the kernel, etc.

OSX is closed. Darwin is only a little bit open. You can see the source but there are a lot of licensing restrictions imposed on what you can actually do with it.

Since Linux works very well on my Mac hardware and doesn't impose the limitations of OSX it's what I prefer to run most of the time, though my system is dual boot. Best of both worlds really.

Loan 2K ?

[muonzoo]

Anyone want to loan me 2K?

Sure, I'll loan you 2K. I expect you to pay it back at 16% P.A. compounded daily over 24 months. Interested? Contact me. Where's a G5 to do the interest calcs when I need one?

Oh... perhaps your really wanted me to give you 2000$? ;-)

Re:Loan 2K ?

[klez23]

hell, i'll give you 4K, if you'll come pick up my VIC-20 that houses it.

Yellow Dog Linux

[Graff]

Yellow Dog Linux has always been a great addition to the Macintosh platform. It's good to see that they are keeping up their excellent support of Apple. More choice is always good and the fact that people can buy systems directly from TerraSoft with Yellow Dog Linux pre-installed is definitely a plus.

My hope is that both Apple and TerraSoft continue to work together and bring ideas back and forth between MacOS and Linux.

Re:maybe i need linux?

[agent dero]

Maybe you should stop posting the same message over and over again, and realize that your machine doesn't run OS X, and you point is not valid at all.

This thread is about the new G5 and Yellow Dog Linux, not your problems with your old powermac, that won't even run YDL without BootX, which makes running YDL slow as hell.

Stop booing Macs because the one you run is old, and especially when your problem is the hard drive, you can stick a 7200RPM drive in any machine to make this excercise faster, mac or PC.

Re:But one questions remains...

[Elwood P Dowd]

Lessee:

Linux Coming to Power Mac G5
Posted by pudge on 05:14 PM June 24th, 2003

But one questions remains... (Score:0)
by Anonymous Coward on 05:20 PM June 24th, 2003

MS word says your post is 952 words long. 952 words divided by 6 minutes is a hair over 158 WPM. OH MY GOD YOU MUST BE MAVIS BEACON!

I am your biggest fan.

Re:But one questions remains...

[muonzoo]

Hmm here are my calculations:

1. Open HUA, visit the site I ripped off. (7 words)
2. Select all (Control-A) ( call that 1 word)
3. Paste (1 word)

For me that's 9 words in 6 minutes or a more realistic (for a Troll) 1.5 WPM.
Mavis is safe and sound; more importantly, she isn't on slashdot.

Bah...

[jafuser]

This is hardly news. Linux is running on cell phones, VCRs, microwave ovens, and vacuum cleaners these days...

Give me something really geeky, like someone hacked their cat to run linux, or the mars rover, or a dill pickle or something...

Re:But one questions remains...

[karlm]

I like OS X. I'll be getting a G5 laptop soon after they arrive and will probably run OS X on it at last 90% of the time, with some forrays into Linux and hopefully the boys in Dresden will have a PPC-64 verion of L4 out by that time. In most ways I prefer OS X to Linux, but your arguments need improvement. You must also remember that there is non-Mac G3 and G4 hardware out there that does not have the Mac firmware necessary for OS X. This hardware is mostly for scientific computing and embedded applications.

1. PowerPC hardware, PowerPC operating system

Linux has its origins on IA32, Intel's 32-bit architecture. Every platform Linux has migrated to since then has been beset with porting problems-- Linux runs 32% more efficiently on Intel than PowerPC. This is very telling as PowerPC is in general much faster per clock than Intel. Somewhere in the translation from PowerPC to IA32 something got lost.

Mac OS is 100% native for PowerPC. The Mach kernel has been optimized for the G3, G4, and 970 since Apple began writing the operating system back in 1996. Why choose a hacked and kludged OS from another platform when you can have an environment tailor-made for the system you'll be running it on? Mac OS certainly isn't plagued by same driver problems Linux is (in)famous for.

OS X began life on m68k NeXT boxes, not PPC hardware. Linux is also 100% native on PPC hardware. The last numbers I saw showed Linux PPC outperformed OS X on the same hardware. I like some of the ideas behind Mach w/ a BSD server. Too bad they put the BSD server in the kernel address space for performance reasons. The driver gap is largely historical at this point, but still a valid but minor concern.

2. Control over the source code

In Linux, the development model is highly irrational: anyone is allowed to submit patches, and one man (Linus Torvalds) sorts through gigabyte after gigabyte of amateurish code, attempting to integrate it into the kernel. Apple's model is much more modern and decisive: the code for the low levels of Mac OS is available for anyone to download and modify, while the more complex parts of the system (QuickTime and OpenGL) are kept closed-source so those that know better-- the Apple programmers-- are the only ones allowed to tinker.

The results because of these differing development models are clear. Apple released a major update to the OS once a year, and releases about five minor updates to the OS, as well as several dozen security patches and driver updates, in the interim. Since March of 2001 we've gone from 10.0 to 10.2.5! Linux is still stuck at some sort of bizarre "in-between" 2.5 kernel patch and won't move on to 2.6 until well after Apple has released Mac OS 10.3.

It's not hard to see the difference here is a bunch of kids playing with source code instead of doing their homework vs. highly qualified professionals pushing their skills to the limits. The Mac OS user benefits.

You missed your opportunity to jab Linux in the ribs. The tender spot here is Linus switching the entire VM subsystem out in the middle of the 2.4 serries. The weakness in the development model is that it is less conservative with no PHB breathing down Linus's neck. The "bunch of punk kids writing a kernel" argument just doesn't hold water. Some of the most respected coders of our day contribute to the Linux kernel, including some very telented professionals at IBM. Sure lots of rubbish gets submitted, but it gets filtered through a heirarchy or very good coders. Linus may be a little overwhelmed, but that results in some good improvements getting dropped on the cutting room floor rather than rubbish making it into the kernel. Per man-hour, the Linux kernel development is therefore very inneficient, but you have an absolutely huge number of coders.

Your argument about not letting people see the QuickTime and OpenGL code is way off. The same effect could be gotten by opening the cod