Law Professor Examines SCO Case

An anonymous submitter writes "This law professor from the University of California points out weakness in SCO's legal bluster, and further takes a poke at closed software, for those hungry for more SCO scraps. At the end, he references Slashdot for more info ('itself a demonstration of the power of dispersed individuals working together')."

Comments

law profs

[ERASE THE JEWS]

It'd be better if Slashdot actually posted arguments on both sides instead of preaching to the choir by posting some random opinion written by an activist lawyer.

Re:Wrong about slashdot

[Bull999999]

"Seriously have you ever notived the vast amount of crud thats posted here? "

Yes, and the worst being yours.

I've said mostly it all.

[tomstdenis]

Only x posts and slashdotted! Must be running their site on product "A".

Imagine a beowolf cluster of item "B", on a "C".

Just wait till the RIAA hears about this! and/or Just wait till the MPAA sees this! and/or Just wait till the **AA hears and/or sees this!

Something SCO would do....Or Sue! Sue! call SCO

BSD is dying, only a few million users left!

Oh and MS knows security like they know open competition.

I used Mozilla once!

1. Action "D"
2. ???
3. Result "E"

MS sucks. or MSFT sucks. or Microsoft sucks. or Micro$oft sucks or Micro$loth sucks.

Linux has a far superior kitch factor.

I'm going to patent patenting. I'm going to patent the wheel, air, fire, water, item "F". Quick hide it from bezos.

I'm going to sue for violating my first post (patent|copyright).

Check my l33t signature!

Accomplishing goal A: Cost "G". Accomplishing goal B: Cost "H", for everything else there is item "I".

Something, something, something, private part [giggle like the school child you are], something, something, something.