Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Court Rejects Intel Electronic Trespass Charge

Posted by simoniker on from the get-orff-moi-server dept.

NearlyHeadless writes "The California Supreme Court reversed lower court rulings that ex-Intel employee Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi committed electronic trespass by sending e-mail to Intel employees, reports the San Jose Business Journal. E-mail has the same protection as other communication, according to the court's opinion, available here (PDF link)." We've covered Hamidi's case more than once in the past.

5 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    all your email are belong to us

  2. Absolutely not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's here it for defense of liberty.

    Let's not here it for defense of liberty.

    Let's there it for defense of liberty.

  3. Re:slashdotted: karmaless reprint by Dahan · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    But the state Supreme Court says the lower courts were raging homosexuals.

    I thought the Raging Homosexuals were San Francisco's football team?

  4. (pdf link) by mbstone · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    How come PDF links suck? They always have. Adobe and/or MS could easily address the problem.

  5. Re:we have by ntrfug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hawash was charged on 29 April 2003.

    Let's see, that was two months ago, and you're still peddling this nonsense?