Slashdot Mirror


RAID for Zero-G?

Cujo asks: "In all seriousness, I need a RAID that supports at least level 3 and stores > 500 GB, and I need to it work in zero-G (but not in a vacuum), and be able to take a fair bit of vibration and noise when turned off. I don't want to spend huge sums: I'm thinking well less than $50,000. I've looked at Apple's XServe/XRaid products, and they look great (about $10,000), but are they rugged enough and who is their competition? Some people make hardened RAIDs for military use, but I'm unfamiliar with the best candidates in that field (and do I really need mil spec?)."

17 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. I don't have an answer, but... by Ummagumma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do you plan on getting this equipment into a zero-g enviornment? That will problable determine if you need hardened/milspec type equipment. If its going up on the shuttle, with those G forces on it during launch, then yeah, you probably do need 'milspec'. If its going to reside in a plane, that does zero-g free-fall testing, you can probably get away with something less... YMMV.

    --
    "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:I don't have an answer, but... by Cujo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Shuttle middeck. It's an environment beningn enough for humans, so not as bad as an ELV ride. The drives would be off and parked during ascent.

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

    2. Re:I don't have an answer, but... by yasth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I would say the opposite. Launch forces aren't that much for a drive esp. as it can be off (or at least not spinning), while the "Vomit Comet" would almost certainly force the drive to be on and take Gs.

      I mean the big reason hard drives fail if dropped is that they are hard bodies and if dropped on a hard thing there isn't much room for compresion so you have near instanareous decelleration. a steady pressure like a launch shouldn't be that bad this desktop IDE drive can take 400 Gs when not on. As for 0g operation, well I wouldn't think that to be much of an issue, as all the drives I know of can be opperated in any position.

      My biggest worry would be heat. Modern drives do get hot, and that might cause problems.

      If one were really worried you could hook up notebook drives in an IDE raid config. High RPM SCSI drives are probably out as it is, and honestly I can't think of much one would be doing in a 0g enivronment that would need the performance.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    3. Re:I don't have an answer, but... by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      With the drives off and parked I'd think that any drive would work. Zero g shouldn't be a problem since any drive I've seen can work upside-down or on its side.

      The shock tolerances for the drive should be available on the technical data sheets, and I'm guessing that for off-and-parked it's in the 100's of g's or more. You probably want to consider building a custom RAID mount for it with lots of rubber grommets. I know here at WI some of our rocket guys have vibration mounts whose sole purpose is to shake the shit out of electronics and make sure it survives. Glue in and zip-tie all the connectors. All in all, it shouldn't require an engineering miracle to survive launch...

      And hey, what's your experiment? :)

      -- Bob

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
  2. Have you tried IBM? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    They do use ThinkPads on the shuttle/ISS after all, so they must have the drives capable of this kind of thing. RAID cabinets and controllers have no moving parts (or maybe a fan or two), so I doubt they would be affected by zero G anyway.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:Have you tried IBM? by jafuser · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is actually a good point.

      An array of the model of hard drives normally used in a laptop would probably be ideal since it is most likely designed to:

      • withstand greater accelerations (laptops get banged around a lot more than desktops/servers)
      • use less power (since laptops run on batteries)
      • have a smaller size
      • create less heat
      I'd suggest doing some research to gather the model number of hard drives used in some of the high-end laptops and then go from there.
      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  3. Uh oh! by icemax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey just because NASA has a tight budget doesn't mean you guys can use Slashdot for your R&D!!!

    --


    __________
    Love conquers all... except CANCER
    1. Re:Uh oh! by DingoBueno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ask Slashdot: Converting feet to meters...

      --
      ascii art
  4. Thermal managment by lonely · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Remember that a lot of mac kit is specifically designed to use convection to move air and therefore heat through the box. For example an old-style iMac will probably melt as it relies heat rising. Not something that is gonna happen in zero-g. You might need to be changing the fans and such like.

  5. China plus /. equals Trip to Mars! by jpsst34 · · Score: 3, Funny

    China has announced it intends to accelerate its Mars program, using experience and expertise from its fledgling lunar program.

    They didn't mention China's use of highly reputable sources of expertise, such as Ask Slashdot!

    --
    How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
  6. Heat and Perfformance by Cujo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The heat is a concern, and the lower the power dissipation, the better.

    The RAID performance in orbit doesn't need to be top drawer, but when it returns to Earth, I want it to perform well and not be a hassle to administer or set up, since there's a lot of data to analyze.

    --

    Helium balloons want to be free.

    1. Re:Heat and Perfformance by spencerogden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would seem to me that you would want max reliability on the flight, and max performance on earth. Is the few hours it would take to transfer >500GBs bad enough to preclude copying to a higher performance system upon return. (Assuming the most reliable and fatest solutions turn out to be utually exclusive)

      As a side note: If you are sending an experiment up on the shuttle, aren't there resources at NASA you can check with? Surely someone has sent a hard drive into space before. As someone mentioned, The only moving parts would be in the drives, so everything else is probably more robust than the drives, they are the weak link you need to worry about.

  7. Heat and Radiation by ka9dgx · · Score: 5, Informative
    I see three main challenges in this scenario:

    • Heat
      Convection cooling gets assumed into almost everything, so you'll have to make sure the gear gets some air forced over everything to keep it cool. Inside the hard drives, you've got those nice platters pushing the air for you, so that should be ok.
    • Air pressure
      You indicate that there will be air, but not the pressure. You should test your system at the operating atmosphere and pressure for an extended amount of time. This is critical because the hard drives typically float on a cushion of the ambient atmosphere.
    • Radiation
      Since you're outside the 50 or so miles of air which filters out most of the radation common in space, make sure you have hardware ECC RAM, etc. It would also be good to make sure there is a hardware watchdog in place to protect the OS from hanging do to an induced CPU error.
    Testing tip:
    I'd suggest you test the unit, then run the same test with the unit operating upside down, and on each of it's other 4 faces, as a minimum.

    You've got an interesting project, good luck!

    --Mike--

  8. You may want to talk to these guys by joehoya · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have worked with these guys before and they are a great group. They have a lot of experience building rugged mass-storage solutions for airborne and military applications. In addition, they are a relatively small company, with a lot of engineering capability, so they should be able to give you personal attention and help you work through the various issues involved in this type of system.

  9. Wait a friggin minute by linuxwrangler · · Score: 3, Redundant

    You are sending up an experiment on shuttle mid-deck which I would hope implies that the experiment is worth the significant risk to human life and great expense that this requires.

    But no, you are looking to cheap-out on the drives that are undoubtedly critical to the success of the experiment. That's pretty damn penny wise and pound foolish.

    Having vented...

    I suspect that NASA has specs and requirements for experiments on spacecraft if not for protecting the integrity of the experiments then at least to protect the astronauts and shuttle. What do those specs dictate?

    If you can use COTS hardware then I suspect that laptop drives are your best bet for not only ruggedness but also weight, power draw, and size.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  10. Re:Not Space by ElectricMayhem · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess he needs it for something simpler - such as skydiving

    I know that whenever I skydive, I strap on my parachute, a reserve, and a 500GB raid pack. Makes the free-fall go just a little bit faster.

  11. Re:Scary by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some issues I haven't seen mentioned:

    1) In zero-g, will lubricants (minimal as they are) be more prone to leak out?

    2) In zero-g, will friction be slightly lower, and will this cause any problems? Does modulation of RPMs depend in any way on any component of friction that is influenced by gravity? How about head movement?

    3) Is head movement and position affected by gravity? I'm guessing not, but then, I'm just joe random slashdotter.

    4) Will vibration issues be introduced by the removal of the (possibly dampening) force of gravity? Note I am not talking about external vibrations here, I'm talking about vibrations of the hard drive itself.